Pulmonary bullet embolism – a safe treatment strategy of a potentially fatal injury: a case report

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licens

The effect of completeness of revascularization during CABG with single versus multiple arterial grafts

IntroductionIncomplete coronary revascularization is associated with suboptimal outcomes. We investigated the longâ term effects of Incomplete, Complete, and Supraâ complete revascularization and whether these effects differed in the setting of singleâ arterial and multiâ arterial coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).MethodsWe analyzed 15â year mortality in 7157 CABG patients (64.1â ±â 10.5 years; 30% women). All patients received a left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending coronary artery graft with additional venous grafts only (singleâ arterial) or with at least one additional arterial graft (multiâ arterial) and were grouped based on a completeness of revascularization index (CRIâ =â number of grafts minus the number of diseased principal coronary arteries): Incomplete (CRIâ â ¤â â 1 [Nâ =â 320;4.5%]); Complete (CRIâ =â 0 [Nâ =â 2882;40.3%]; reference group); and two Supraâ complete categories (CRIâ =â +1[Nâ =â 3050; 42.6%]; CRIâ â ¥â +â 2 [Nâ =â 905; 12.6%]). Riskâ adjusted mortality hazard ratios (AHR) were calculated using comprehensive propensity score adjustment by Cox regression.ResultsIncomplete revascularization was rare (4.5%) but associated with increased mortality in all patients (AHR [95% confidence interval]â =â 1.53 [1.29â 1.80]), those undergoing singleâ arterial CABG (AHRâ =â 1.27 [1.04â 1.54]) and multiâ arterial CABG (AHRâ =â 2.18 [1.60â 2.99]), as well as in patients with 3â Vessel (AHRâ =â 1.37 [1.16â 1.62]) and, to a lesser degree, with 2â Vessel (AHRâ =â 1.67 [0.53â 5.23]) coronary disease. Supraâ complete revascularization was generally associated with incrementally decreased mortality in all patients (AHR [CRIâ =â +1]â =â 0.94 [0.87â 1.03]); AHR [CRIâ â ¥â +2]â =â 0.74 [0.64â 0.85]), and was driven by a significantly decreased mortality risk in singleâ arterial CABG (AHR [CRIâ =â +1]â =â 0.90 [0.81â 0.99]; AHR [CRIâ â ¥â +2]â =â 0.64 [0.53â 0.78]); and 3â Vessel disease patients (AHR [CRIâ =â +1]â =â 0.94 [0.86â 1.04]; and AHR [CRIâ â ¥â +2]â =â 0.75 [0.63â 0.88]) with no impact in multiâ arterial CABG (AHR [CRIâ =â +1]â =â 1.07 [0.91â 1.26]; AHR [CRIâ â ¥â +2]â =â 0.93 [0.73â 1.17]).ConclusionsIncomplete revascularization is associated with decreased late survival, irrespective of grafting strategy. Alternatively, supraâ complete revascularization is associated with improved survival in patients with 3â Vessel CAD, and in singleâ arterial but not multiâ arterial CABG.Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146364/1/jocs13810.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146364/2/jocs13810_am.pd

Pre-operative right ventricular echocardiographic parameters associated with short-term outcomes and long-term mortality after CABG

Background: This analysis aims to assess the prognostic value of pre-operative right ventricular echocardiographic parameters in predicting short-term adverse outcomes and long-term mortality after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Methods: Study design: Observational retrospective cohort. Pre-operative echocardiographic data, perioperative adverse outcomes (POAO) and long-term mortality were retrospectively analyzed in 491 patients who underwent isolated CABG at a single academic center between 2006 and 2014. Results: Average age of enrolled subjects was 66 ± 11.5 years with majority being male (69%). 227/491 patients had 30 days POAO (46%); most common being post-operative atrial fibrillation (27.3%) followed by prolonged ventilation duration (12.7%). On multivariate analysis, left atrial volume index ≥42 mL/m2 (LAVI) (OR (95% CI): 1.98 (1.03–3.82), P = 0.04), mitral E/A >2 (1.97 (1.02–3.78), P = 0.04), right atrial size >18 cm2 (1.86 (1.14–3.05), P = 0.01), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) <16 mm (1.8 (1.03–3.17), P = 0.04), right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) ≥36 mmHg (pulmonary hypertension) (1.6 (1.03–2.38), P = 0.04) and right ventricle myocardial performance index (RVMPI) >0.55 (1.58 (1.01–2.46), P = 0.04) were found to be associated with increased 30-day POAO. On 3.5-year follow-up, cumulative survival was decreased in patients with myocardial performance index (MPI) ≥0.55 (log rank: 4.5, P = 0.034) and in patients with mitral valve E/e′ ≥14 (log rank: 4.9, P = 0.026). Conclusion: Pre-operative right ventricle dysfunction (RVD) is associated with increased perioperative complications. Furthermore, pre-operative RVD and increased left atrial pressures are associated with long-term mortality post CABG

Early efficacy of CABG care delivery in a low procedure-volume community hospital: operative and midterm results

BACKGROUND: The Leapfrog Group recommended that coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery should be done at high volume hospitals (>450 per year) without corresponding surgeon-volume criteria. The latter confounds procedure-volume effects substantially, and it is suggested that high surgeon-volume (>125 per year) rather than hospital-volume may be a more appropriate indicator of CABG quality. METHODS: We assessed 3-year isolated CABG morbidity and mortality outcomes at a low-volume hospital (LVH: 504 cases) and compared them to the corresponding Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) national data over the same period (2001–2003). All CABGs were performed by 5 high-volume surgeons (161–285 per year). "Best practice" care at LVH – including effective practice guidelines, protocols, data acquisition capabilities, case review process, dedicated facilities and support personnel – were closely modeled after a high-volume hospital served by the same surgeon-team. RESULTS: Operative mortality was similar for LVH and STS (OM: 2.38% vs. 2.53%), and the corresponding LVH observed-to-expected mortality (O/E = 0.81) indicated good quality relative to the STS risk model (O/E<1). Also, these results were consistent irrespective of risk category: O/E was 0, 0.9 and 1.03 for very-low risk (<1%), low risk (1–3%) and moderate-to-high risk category (>3%), respectively. Postoperative leg wound infections, ventilator hours, renal dysfunction (no dialysis), and atrial fibrillation were higher for LVH, but hospital stay was not. The unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival for the LVH cohort was 96%, 94%, and 92% at one, two, and three years, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that high quality CABG care can be achieved at LVH programs if 1) served by high volume surgeons and 2) patient care procedures similar to those of large programs are implemented. This approach may prove a useful paradigm to ensure high quality CABG care and early efficacy at low volume institutions that wish to comply with the Leapfrog standards

Use rate and outcome in bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting:Insights From a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background This meta‐analysis was designed to assess whether center experience affects the short‐ and long‐term results and the relative benefits of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting (BITA) for coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods and Results MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched to identify all articles reporting the outcome of BITA in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. The BITA center experience was gauged according to the percentage use of BITA in the institutional overall coronary artery bypass grafting population (%BITA). The primary outcome was long‐term all‐cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were operative mortality, perioperative myocardial infarction, perioperative stroke, deep sternal wound infections (DSWIs), and major postoperative adverse event. The rates of the primary and secondary outcomes were calculated after adjusting for %BITA. Primary and secondary outcomes were also compared between the BITA and the single internal thoracic artery arms in the adjusted studies. Meta‐regression was used to evaluate the effect of %BITA on the primary and secondary outcomes. Thirty‐four studies (27 894 patients undergoing BITA) were included. In the pooled analysis, the incidence rate for long‐term mortality was 2.83% (95% confidence interval, 2.21%–3.61%). %BITA was significantly and inversely associated with long‐term mortality and the rate of DSWI. In the pairwise comparison, %BITA was significantly and inversely associated with the risk of long‐term mortality and DSWI in the group undergoing BITA. Conclusions BITA series with higher %BITA report significantly lower long‐term mortality and DSWI rate as well as higher long‐term survival advantage and lower relative risk of DSWI in their BITA cohort. These findings suggest that a specific volume‐outcome relationship exists for BITA grafting. </jats:sec

Radial Artery Versus Right Internal Thoracic Artery Versus Saphenous Vein as the Second Conduit for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery:A Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes

Background-There remains uncertainty regarding the second-best conduit after the internal thoracic artery in coronary artery bypass grafting. Few studies directly compared the clinical results of the radial artery (RA), right internal thoracic artery (RITA), and saphenous vein (SV). No network meta-analysis has compared these 3 strategies.Methods and Results-MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for adjusted observational studies and randomized controlled trials comparing the RA, SV, and/or RITA as the second conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting. The primary end point was all-cause long-term mortality. Secondary end points were operative mortality, perioperative stroke, perioperative myocardial infarction, and deep sternal wound infection (DSWI). Pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed. A total of 149 902 patients (4 randomized, 31 observational studies) were included (RA, 16 201, SV, 112 018, RITA, 21 683). At NMA, the use of SV was associated with higher long-term mortality compared with the RA (incidence rate ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.12-1.34) and RITA (incidence rate ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.17-1.35). The risk of DSWI for SV was similar to RA but lower than RITA (odds ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55-0.91). There were no differences for any outcome between RITA and RA, although DSWI trended higher with RITA (odds ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.92-2.1). The risk of DSWI in bilateral internal thoracic artery studies was higher when the skeletonization technique was not used.Conclusions-The use of the RA or the RITA is associated with a similar and statistically significant long-term clinical benefit compared with the SV. There are no differences in operative risk or complications between the 2 arterial conduits, but DSWI remains a concern with bilateral ITA when skeletonization is not used.</p