The effect of a multidisciplinary outpatient team approach on outcomes in diabetic foot care:a single center study

BACKGROUND: Recent studies showed no reduction in major amputation rates after introduction of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer. The efficacy of MDTs in the current standard of care is being questioned. This retrospective single-center study evaluated the efficacy of an outpatient MDT approach on limb salvage and ulcer healing in treating diabetic foot ulcers.METHODS: Patients with a diabetic foot ulcer treated before (2015) and after (2017) implementation of an MDT in a single center were compared. The MDT met weekly and consisted of a vascular surgeon, physiatrist, internist, shoe technician, wound care nurse, nurse practitioner, cast technician, and podiatrist. The primary outcome was limb salvage at 1 year. Secondary outcomes were ulcer healing, amputation-free survival, freedom from any amputation, and overall survival. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess predictors for major amputation.RESULTS: A vascular surgeon treated 104 patients with 148 ulcers in 2015, and the multidisciplinary team treated 133 patients with 188 ulcers in 2017. Limb salvage (90.9% vs. 95.5%, P = 0.050), freedom from any amputation (56.5% vs. 78.0%, P &lt; 0.001), and ulcer healing (48.3% vs. 69.2%, P &lt; 0.001) were significantly lower in the non-MDT group than in the MDT group. Amputation-free survival and overall survival did not differ significantly between the groups. Predictors for major amputation were University of Texas Wound Classification 3D (hazard ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-6.45) and being treated in the non-MDT group (hazard ratio, 3.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-11.08).CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study found an MDT dedicated to diabetic foot care was highly effective in increasing limb salvage and ulcer healing. We advise that such an MDT is an integrated part of the patient's chain-based care.</p

Comparing Venous Reconstructions and Antimicrobial Graft Reconstructions in Mycotic Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms and Aortic Graft Infections

Background: The perioperative mortality and morbidity rates of surgical repair of mycotic abdominal aortic aneurysms and aortic graft infections are high, and the appropriate treatment is debated. This retrospective study compared venous and antimicrobial prosthetic aortic graft reconstructions. Methods: All patients of the Northwest Clinics and St. Antonius Hospital who were treated for mycotic abdominal aortic aneurysms or aortic graft infections between January 1, 2008, and January 1, 2018, were analyzed. Exclusion criterion was treatment other than venous or antimicrobial reconstructions. Primary end points were 30-day complications and mortality rates and 3-year overall survival. Secondary end points were reintervention-free survival, persistent infection and reinfection rates, and hospital length of stay. Results: Fifty-one patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 32 underwent venous reconstructions and 19 antimicrobial prosthetic aortic graft reconstructions. Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between these groups, except for duration of surgical repair, which was longer in the venous group. The 30-day and 1-year mortality rates, reinfection rates, complication rates, and hospital length of stay did not significantly differ between the groups. The 3-year overall survival was 77% for venous reconstruction compared with 66% for antimicrobial reconstruction (P = 0.781). The 30-day reintervention rate was 19% for the venous group compared with 42% for the prosthetic group (P = 0.071). Reintervention-free survival at 3 years was 46% for the venous group compared with 52% for the prosthetic group (P = 0.615). Conclusions: Venous reconstruction tends to have better 3-year overall survival and lower 30-day reintervention rates compared with antimicrobial prosthetic graft reconstruction in patients with mycotic abdominal aortic aneurysms or abdominal aortic graft infections. In the acute setting, antimicrobial prosthetic graft reconstruction is a valuable solution due to the shorter operation time and similar 30-day mortality and complication rates

A systematic review and meta-analysis of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for below-the-knee arterial disease

INTRODUCTION: Different types of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVSs) have been developed and used in below-the-knee (BTK) arterial diseases. This is the first study reviewing and analyzing the literature on BVS treatment for BTK arterial disease. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for studies published until October 21, 2019. The search, study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction were performed by 2 authors independently. Articles that studied the treatment of BTK arterial disease by using BVSs were eligible. Exclusion criteria were studies with a variant design (e.g. case reports <5 patients), non-BTK indications for BVS use, and nonhuman studies. Primary endpoint was 12-month primary patency. Secondary endpoints were 12-month freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), limb salvage, survival, and amputation-free survival (AFS). Study quality was assessed by the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies score. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Five studies representing 155 patients with 160 treated limbs met the inclusion criteria. Pooled 12-month primary patency per limb was 90% (143/160; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84-0.95), freedom from CD-TLR 96% (124/130; 95% CI: 0.91-0.99), limb salvage rate 97% (156/160; 95% CI: 0.94-1.00), survival rate 90% (112/125; 95% CI: 0.82-0.96), and AFS rate 89% (110/125; 95% CI: 0.81-0.94). Subgroup analyses of included Absorb BVS studies showed similar results. All studies were assessed as moderate quality. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of case series showed good 12-month patency and clinical results with BVSs for BTK arterial disease, even in patients with multimorbidity and short but complex lesions. These results encourage a revival of this scaffold

Development of a Prediction Model for the Occurrence of Stenosis or Occlusion after Percutaneous Deep Venous Arterialization

Percutaneous deep venous arterialization (pDVA) is a promising treatment option in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Stenosis and occlusions, which are the Achilles' heel of every revascularization procedure, can be treated when detected early. However, frequent monitoring after pDVA is required because when stenosis or occlusions develop is unknown. Therefore, patients currently need to visit the hospital every 2 weeks for surveillance, which can be burdensome. Accordingly, we aimed to develop a model that can predict future stenosis or occlusions in patients after pDVA to be able to create tailor-made follow-up protocols. The data set included 343 peak systolic velocity and 335 volume flow measurements of 23 patients. A stenosis or occlusion developed in 17 patients, and 6 patients remained lesion-free. A statistically significant increase in the risk of stenosis or occlusion was found when duplex ultrasound values decreased 20% within 1 month. The prediction model was also able to estimate a patient-specific risk of future stenosis or occlusions. This is promising for the possibility of reducing the frequency of follow-up visits for low-risk patients and increasing the frequency for high-risk patients. These observations are the starting point for individual surveillance programs in post-pDVA patients. Future studies with a larger cohort are necessary for validation of this model

Drug Coated Balloon Angioplasty vs. Standard Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty in Below the Knee Peripheral Arterial Disease:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: The aim was to review and analyse the literature on clinical outcomes of drug coated balloon (DCB) vs. standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for the treatment of infrapopliteal arterial disease. Methods: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis. The MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for studies published between January 2008 and November 2018. Two authors independently performed the search, study selection, assessment of methodological quality and data extraction. Studies were eligible when reporting PTA and DCB outcomes in infrapopliteal arteries, published in English, human studies, and full text was available. Methodological quality was determined by MINORS and Cochrane risk of bias tool. GRADE methodology was used to rate the evidence for observed outcomes. The primary outcome was the 12 month limb salvage rate. Secondary outcomes were 12 month survival, amputation free survival (AFS), restenosis, and target lesion revascularisation (TLR) rates. Inclusion criteria for pooling data were randomised controlled trials and comparative studies with 12 month outcomes. Results: Ten studies representing 1593 patients met the inclusion criteria. The quality was assessed as moderate or low. Data from five studies were pooled, and 12 month outcomes for DCB vs. PTA were limb salvage rate, 94.0% vs. 95.7% (odds ratio (OR), 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.39-2.21); and survival rate, 89.8% vs. 92.9% (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.39-1.21). Data from four studies were pooled, and 12 month outcomes for PTA vs. DCB were restenosis rate, 62.0% vs. 32.9% (OR 2.87; 95% CI 0.83-9.92); and TLR rate, 27.8% vs. 14.0% (OR 2.76; 95% CI 0.90-8.48). Pooled data from two studies showed 12 month AFS rate for DCB vs. PTA; 82.5% vs. 88.7% (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.23-2.75). No statistically significant differences were found. Conclusion: Based on this systematic review and meta-analysis no significant differences in limb salvage, survival, restenosis, TLR, and AFS rates were found when DCB angioplasty was compared with standard PTA

Treatment of clinically uninfected diabetic foot ulcers, with and without antibiotics

Objective: Current guidelines do not recommend the use of antibiotics to treat clinically uninfected ulcers. However, physicians continue to prescribe antibiotics for clinically uninfected ulcers with the rationale ‘better to be safe than sorry’. Yet, antibiotic resistance is increasing, side-effects are common and treatment costs are rising. Evidence is needed to identify whether antibiotic treatment for clinically uninfected ulcers can be justified or we should stop prescribing them. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether antibiotic treatment in cases of clinically uninfected ulcers improved ulcer healing compared to treatment without antibiotics. Method: Consecutive patients treated in the outpatient clinic for clinically uninfected diabetic foot ulcer both in 2015 and in 2017 were retrospectively analysed. Primary outcome was ulcer healing at one year. Secondary outcomes were limb salvage, freedom from any amputation, amputation-free survival (AFS) and survival. Results: A total of 102 ulcers of 91 patients were included for final analyses. The non-antibiotics and antibiotics groups both consisted of 51 ulcers. Ulcer healing at one year was 77.3% in the non-antibiotics group and 74.7% in the antibiotics group (p=0.158). No difference was found for limb salvage (93.8% versus 95.9%, respectively; p=0.661), freedom from any amputation (85.6% versus 85.6%, respectively; p=1.000), AFS (85.4% versus 79.1%, respectively; p=0.460) or survival (89.6% versus 83.7%, respectively; p=0.426). Conclusion: In this study, no benefits of antibiotic treatment over non-antibiotic treatment for clinically uninfected ulcers were identified. The findings of this study emphasise the recommendation of current guidelines to not treat clinically uninfected ulcer with antibiotics.</p

Below-the-Ankle Angioplasty in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of below-the-ankle (BTA) angioplasty and to assess whether additional BTA angioplasty after below-the-knee (BTK) angioplasty would improve clinical outcomes in patients with critical limb ischemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two authors independently performed the search, study selection, assessment of methodological quality, and data extraction for this systematic review and meta-analysis. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched. Articles were eligible if it was reported that BTA angioplasty was performed and if the articles were published in English and had the full text available. Methodological quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) score. The primary outcome was 12-month limb salvage rate. Secondary outcomes were 12-month amputation-free survival, technical success, complications, survival, and freedom from reintervention. RESULTS: Ten articles met the inclusion criteria, reporting a total of 478 patients with BTA angioplasty performed in 524 legs. Three of the 10 included studies compared BTK angioplasty only to BTK angioplasty and additional BTA angioplasty. The pooled 12-month limb salvage rate was 92% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.96). No statistically significant difference was found in limb salvage when additional BTA angioplasty was compared to BTK angioplasty only (odds ratio [OR], 1.23; 95% CI, 0.61-2.49). The pooled 12-month amputation-free survival was 78% (95% CI, 0.69-0.87). No statistically significant difference was found in amputation-free survival rate when additional BTA angioplasty was compared to BTK angioplasty only (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 0.95-2.64). The methodological quality of the studies included was moderate, according to the MINORS score. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that additional BTA angioplasty is a safe and feasible procedure, with a 92% pooled proportion of limb salvage at 12 months

Comparative study of venous arterialization and pedal bypass in a patient cohort with critical limb ischemia

Patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) have a poor life expectancy, and aggressive revascularization is accepted as a means to maintain their independence in the end stage of life. The goal of this case-control study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of distal venous arterialization and compare this with pedal bypass surgery in patients with CLI, and to identify potential risk factors that could be used to effectively identify patients at high risk of graft occlusion and amputation. A retrospective cohort of patients was treated for CLI using venous arterialization or pedal bypass between 2007 and 2012. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate predictors for limb salvage and patency. In 40 patients with CLI, 21 venous arterializations and 19 pedal bypasses were performed. In the venous arterialization group, early occlusion was 15%, 1-year patency was 71%, and limb salvage was 53%. In the PB group, early occlusion was 23%, one-year patency was 75% and limb salvage was 47%. The only independent risk factor for limb salvage in multivariate analysis was bypass occlusion (P <0.001). Limb salvage after venous arterialization was equal to limb salvage after pedal bypass surgery in this clinical comparative stud

A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment modalities for anterior accessory saphenous vein insufficiency

Objective: To investigate and compare the outcomes of the available treatment modalities for anterior accessory saphenous vein (AASV) incompetence. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Studies reporting the outcomes of patients who were treated for primary AASV incompetence were included. The methodologic quality of the articles was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). A random-effects model was used to estimate anatomic success, defined as AASV occlusion. The secondary outcomes were pain during and after treatment, venous clinical severity score, quality of life, esthetic result, time to return to daily activities, and complications. Results: The search identified 860 articles, of which 16 met the inclusion criteria. A total of 609 AASVs were reported. The included studies were of poor or moderate quality according to MINORS score. The pooled anatomic success rates were 91.8% after endovenous laser ablation and radiofrequency ablation (EVLA, RFA, 11 studies), 93.6% after cyanoacrylate closure (3 studies), and 79.8% after sclerotherapy (2 studies). The non-pooled anatomic success rate was 97.9% after phlebectomy and 82% after CHIVA. Paresthesia was seen after EVLA in 0.7% of patients (6 studies). Phlebitis was seen in 2.6% of patients after RFA (2 studies), 27% after sclerotherapy (1 study), and 12% after the phlebectomy (1 study). Deep venous thrombosis and skin burn did not occur. Conclusion: Treatment of AASV incompetence is safe and effective. Despite limited evidence, occlusion of the AASV can be achieved with endovenous thermal ablation and cyanoacrylate. There does not appear to be a benefit of EVLA compared to RFA regarding treatment efficacy. Phlebectomy shows promising results if the saphenofemoral junction is competent. Lower results are seen after sclerotherapy and CHIVA. However, studies with sufficient sample sizes of solely treatment of AASV incompetence are needed to draw firm conclusions

Below-the-Ankle Angioplasty in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of below-the-ankle (BTA) angioplasty and to assess whether additional BTA angioplasty after below-the-knee (BTK) angioplasty would improve clinical outcomes in patients with critical limb ischemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two authors independently performed the search, study selection, assessment of methodological quality, and data extraction for this systematic review and meta-analysis. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched. Articles were eligible if it was reported that BTA angioplasty was performed and if the articles were published in English and had the full text available. Methodological quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) score. The primary outcome was 12-month limb salvage rate. Secondary outcomes were 12-month amputation-free survival, technical success, complications, survival, and freedom from reintervention. RESULTS: Ten articles met the inclusion criteria, reporting a total of 478 patients with BTA angioplasty performed in 524 legs. Three of the 10 included studies compared BTK angioplasty only to BTK angioplasty and additional BTA angioplasty. The pooled 12-month limb salvage rate was 92% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.96). No statistically significant difference was found in limb salvage when additional BTA angioplasty was compared to BTK angioplasty only (odds ratio [OR], 1.23; 95% CI, 0.61-2.49). The pooled 12-month amputation-free survival was 78% (95% CI, 0.69-0.87). No statistically significant difference was found in amputation-free survival rate when additional BTA angioplasty was compared to BTK angioplasty only (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 0.95-2.64). The methodological quality of the studies included was moderate, according to the MINORS score. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that additional BTA angioplasty is a safe and feasible procedure, with a 92% pooled proportion of limb salvage at 12 months