Genetic and environmental factors in human carcinogenesis

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/26449/1/0000537.pd

In appreciation

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/26466/1/0000554.pd

Prostate cancer screening practices and cancer control research (United States)

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/42529/1/10552_2004_Article_398078.pd

Diet and risk for breast cancer recurrence and survival

Dietary factors may influence the risk for breast cancer and also the prognosis following diagnosis and treatment. The aim of this study was to assess whether self-reported prediagnosis diet or other patient factors associated with breast cancer incidence were predictive of recurrence and survival. Patients (n=149) diagnosed with primary breast cancer between 1989 and 1991 were followed for five or more years. Total energy (hazard ratio (HR)=1.58, 95%, confidence interval (CI)= 1.05, 2.38) as well as total (HR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.05, 2.01), saturated (HR = 1.79,95% CI = 1.05, 3.04), and monounsaturated (HR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.09,2.49) fat intakes were associated with increased risk, and energy-adjusted bread and cereal consumption (HR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.33, 0.93) with decreased risk of recurrence. Both total energy (HR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.03, 2.43) and polyunsaturated fat (HR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.09, 3.13) intakes were associated with an increased risk of death. All associations between dietary fat and recurrence and survival attenuated following energy adjustment. Oral contraceptive use (HR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.03, 1.60), lymph node positive status (HR = 2.36, 95% CI = 1.01, 5.49), and tumor stage (HR = 2.22, 95% CI = 1.02, 4.81) were associated with increased risk of recurrence. Tumor stage (HR = 4.96, 95% CI = 1.86, 13.23), lymph node positive status (HR = 3.31, 95% CI = 1.38, 7.95, and estrogen receptor negative status (HR = 2.46, 95% CI = 1.02, 5.94) were associated with increased risk, and arm muscle circumference (HR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.09, 0.86) and mammographic utilization (HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61, 0.98) with decreased risk of death. Higher levels of energy, fat intakes, and selected patient characteristics (particularly disease stage and anthropometric indicators of adiposity) appear to increase risk of recurrence and/or shortened survival following the diagnosis of breast cancer.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44203/1/10549_2004_Article_194284.pd

Alcohol consumption and the risk of breast cancer: A report from the Tecumseh Community Health Study

The relationship between prior alcohol consumption and the risk of breast cancer was studied in 1954 women in the Tecumseh Community Health Study (TCHS) who entered the cohort in 1959-1960 and were followed potentially for 28 years. The mean alcohol consumption at baseline was 0.89 (SD 2.2) oz/week for premenopausal women and 0.85 (SD 2.2) oz/week for postmenopausal women. Only 25% of the cohort consumed more than 0.5 oz of ethanol/week or about 1.6 g/day. The adjusted relative risks (RRs) for breast cancer associated with the use of ethanol vs never drinking were 0.93 (95% CI, 0.40 - 2.18) for ex-drinkers, 1.08 (95% CI, 0.64 - 1.82) for 0-< 1 drink/day, 1.23 (95% CI, 0.49 - 3.10) for 1-<2 drinks/day and 1.12 (95% CI, 0.25 - 5.01) for [sce]2 drinks/day. There were only 37 subjects in the group at the highest level of consumption ([sce]2 drinks/day). There was no significant interaction between alcohol and the period of onset of breast cancer (premenopausal or postmenopausal). In the TCHS, alcohol consumption generally at levels not exceeding 2 drinks/day, was not significantly associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. Although we have found little excess risk associated with alcohol consumption, the wide confidence intervals summarized above are not inconsistent with previously published reports that have suggested a modest positive association.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/29644/1/0000733.pd

Genetic variation in Glutathione S-Transferase Omega-1, Arsenic Methyltransferase and Methylene-tetrahydrofolate Reductase, arsenic exposure and bladder cancer: a case–control study

Abstract Background Ingestion of groundwater with high concentrations of inorganic arsenic has been linked to adverse health outcomes, including bladder cancer, however studies have not consistently observed any elevation in risk at lower concentrations. Genetic variability in the metabolism and clearance of arsenic is an important consideration in any investigation of its potential health risks. Therefore, we examined the association between genes thought to play a role in the metabolism of arsenic and bladder cancer. Methods Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in GSTO-1, As3MT and MTHFR were genotyped using DNA from 219 bladder cancer cases and 273 controls participating in a case–control study in Southeastern Michigan and exposed to low to moderate (\u3c50 μg/L) levels of arsenic in their drinking water. A time-weighted measure of arsenic exposure was constructed using measures from household water samples combined with past residential history, geocoded and merged with archived arsenic data predicted from multiple resources. Results While no single SNP in As3MT was significantly associated with bladder cancer overall, several SNPs were associated with bladder cancer among those exposed to higher arsenic levels. Individuals with one or more copies of the C allele in rs11191439 (the Met287Thr polymorphism) had an elevated risk of bladder cancer (OR = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.04-1.32 per 1 μg/L increase in average exposure). However, no association was observed between average arsenic exposure and bladder cancer among TT homozygotes in the same SNP. Bladder cancer cases were also 60% less likely to be homozygotes for the A allele in rs1476413 in MTHFR compared to controls (OR = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.18-0.88). Conclusions Variation in As3MT and MTHFR is associated with bladder cancer among those exposed to relatively low concentrations of inorganic arsenic. Further investigation is warranted to confirm these findings

Benefits and risks of menopausal estrogen and/or progestin hormone use,

Current evidence is reviewed here on risks and benefits of estrogen and progestin use by peri- and postmenopausal women in relation to the following conditions: endometrial cancer, breast cancer, osteoporosis, and coronary artery disease (CAD). On balance, estrogen therapy appears to be beneficial for menopausal women, as it probably reduces the risks of CAD and osteoporosis, two of the major causes of mortality and morbidity. Although unopposed estrogen therapy increases the risk of endometrial cancer, that cancer is relatively rare and is not fatal in the vast majority of cases associated with estrogen use. Definitive conclusions about the relation of menopausal estrogens to breast cancer cannot be drawn due to inconsistent evidence to date. Although evidence from randomized controlled trials is lacking, biochemical and clinical evidence suggest that progestin supplementation is associated with a reduction in endometrial cancer risk in women taking menopausal estrogens. Progestin supplementation also may augment the beneficial effects of estrogens in providing protection against osteoporosis, although this effect is not yet well established. There is little direct evidence bearing on the relation of menopausal progestins to breast cancer. Although studies of CAD per se are lacking at present, progestins probably unfavorably alter lipoprotein profiles, thereby increasing a user's risk of CAD. Given the relatively high incidence and mortality of CAD in postmenopausal women, any negative effects on CAD risk could potentially counterbalance beneficial effects on other causes. We conclude that estrogen replacement therapy is of potential benefit to postmenopausal women, but that the question of progestin supplementation requires further study, particularly for CAD risk.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/27382/1/0000412.pd

Genetic variation in Glutathione S-Transferase Omega-1, Arsenic Methyltransferase and Methylene-tetrahydrofolate Reductase, arsenic exposure and bladder cancer: a case–control study

Abstract Background Ingestion of groundwater with high concentrations of inorganic arsenic has been linked to adverse health outcomes, including bladder cancer, however studies have not consistently observed any elevation in risk at lower concentrations. Genetic variability in the metabolism and clearance of arsenic is an important consideration in any investigation of its potential health risks. Therefore, we examined the association between genes thought to play a role in the metabolism of arsenic and bladder cancer. Methods Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in GSTO-1, As3MT and MTHFR were genotyped using DNA from 219 bladder cancer cases and 273 controls participating in a case–control study in Southeastern Michigan and exposed to low to moderate (<50 μg/L) levels of arsenic in their drinking water. A time-weighted measure of arsenic exposure was constructed using measures from household water samples combined with past residential history, geocoded and merged with archived arsenic data predicted from multiple resources. Results While no single SNP in As3MT was significantly associated with bladder cancer overall, several SNPs were associated with bladder cancer among those exposed to higher arsenic levels. Individuals with one or more copies of the C allele in rs11191439 (the Met287Thr polymorphism) had an elevated risk of bladder cancer (OR = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.04-1.32 per 1 μg/L increase in average exposure). However, no association was observed between average arsenic exposure and bladder cancer among TT homozygotes in the same SNP. Bladder cancer cases were also 60% less likely to be homozygotes for the A allele in rs1476413 in MTHFR compared to controls (OR = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.18-0.88). Conclusions Variation in As3MT and MTHFR is associated with bladder cancer among those exposed to relatively low concentrations of inorganic arsenic. Further investigation is warranted to confirm these findings.http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/112833/1/12940_2012_Article_570.pd

Patient Satisfaction with Primary Care Office-Based Buprenorphine/Naloxone Treatment

BACKGROUND: Factors associated with satisfaction among patients receiving primary care–based buprenorphine/naloxone are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors related to patient satisfaction in patients receiving primary care–based buprenorphine/naloxone that varied in counseling intensity (20 vs 45 minutes) and office visit frequency (weekly vs thrice weekly). DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and forty-two opioid-dependent subjects. MEASUREMENTS: Demographics, drug treatment history, and substance use status at baseline and during treatment were collected. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction at 12 weeks. RESULTS: Patients’ mean overall satisfaction score was 4.4 (out of 5). Patients were most satisfied with the medication and ancillary services and indicated strong willingness to refer a substance-abusing friend for the same treatment. Patients were least satisfied with their interactions with other opioid-dependent patients, referrals to Narcotics Anonymous, and the inconvenience of the treatment location. Female gender (β = .17, P = .04) and non-White ethnicity/race (β = .17, P = .04) independently predicted patient satisfaction. Patients who received briefer counseling and buprenorphine/naloxone dispensed weekly had greater satisfaction than those whose medication was dispensed thrice weekly (mean difference 4.9, 95% confidence interval 0.08 to 9.80, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients are satisfied with primary care office-based buprenorphine/naloxone. Providers should consider the identified barriers to patient satisfaction

Primary Care Office-based Buprenorphine Treatment: Comparison of Heroin and Prescription Opioid Dependent Patients

BACKGROUND: Prescription opioid dependence is increasing, but treatment outcomes with office-based buprenorphine/naloxone among these patients have not been described. METHODS: We compared demographic, clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes among 200 patients evaluated for entry into a trial of primary care office-based buprenorphine/naloxone treatment stratifying on those who reported exclusive heroin use (n = 124), heroin and prescription opioid use (n = 47), or only prescription opioid use (n = 29). RESULTS: Compared to heroin-only patients, prescription-opioid-only patients were younger, had fewer years of opioid use, and less drug treatment history. They were also more likely to be white, earned more income, and were less likely to have Hepatitis C antibodies. Prescription-opioid-only patients were more likely to complete treatment (59% vs. 30%), remained in treatment longer (21.0 vs. 14.2 weeks), and had a higher percent of opioid-negative urine samples than heroin only patients (56.3% vs. 39.8%), all p values < .05. Patients who used both heroin and prescription opioids had outcomes that were intermediate between heroin-only and prescription-opioid-only patients. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals dependent on prescription opioids have an improved treatment response to buprenorphine/naloxone maintenance in an office-based setting compared to those who exclusively or episodically use heroin