Determinants of delay in the head and neck oncology care pathway:The next step in value-based health care

Objective Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) are relatively fast-growing tumours, and delay of treatment is associated with tumour progression and adverse outcomes. The aim of this study is to identify determinants of delay in a head and neck oncology centre. Methods This cohort study with prospectively collected data investigated associations between patient (including geriatric assessment at first consultation), tumour and treatment characteristics and treatment delay. Two quality indicator intervals assessing value-based healthcare were studied: care pathway interval (CPI, interval between first visit in an HNOC and treatment initiation) and time-to-treatment initiation (TTI, interval between histopathological confirmation of HNSCC and treatment initiation), using regression analyses. Results Stage-IV tumours and initial radiotherapy were independent predictors of delay in CPI. Initial radiotherapy was associated with delay in TTI. Overall, 37% of the patients started treatment within 30 days after first consultation (67% in case of initial surgical treatment and 11.5% if treated with (chemo)radiation, p <0.001). Geriatric assessment outcomes were not associated with delay. Indicators for delay in initial surgery patients were stage-IV tumours (CPI). Conclusion The majority of HNSCC patients encounter delay in treatment initiation, specifically in patients with advanced-stage tumours or when radiotherapy is indicated

Impact of Delay on Hospitalization in Older Patients With Head and Neck Cancer:A Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of delay in treatment initiation on hospitalization, overall survival, and recurrence in older patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter study. SETTING: Two tertiary referral centers. METHODS: All patients with newly diagnosed HNC (≥60 years) treated between 2015 and 2017 were retrospectively included. Time-to-treatment intervals were assessed (ie, calendar days between first visit and start of treatment). Multiple multivariable models were performed with hospital admission days (>14 days), survival, and recurrence as dependent outcome variables. RESULTS: In total, 525 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 70.7 years and 70.7% were male. Median time to treatment was 34.0 days, and 36.3% started treatment within 30 days (P = .576 between centers). Patients with radiotherapy had longer time to treatment than surgical patients (39.0 vs 29.0 days, P 14 days) in the first year after treatment in an adjusted model (odds ratio, 4.66 [95% CI, 2.59-8.37]; P < .001). Delay in treatment initiation was not associated with overall survival or tumor recurrence. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the importance and challenges of ensuring timely treatment initiation in older patients with HNC, as treatment delay was an independent predictor of hospitalization. During oncologic workup, taking time to consider patient-centered outcomes (including minimizing time spent in hospital) while ensuring timely start of treatment requires well-structured, fast-track care pathways

Determinants of delay and association with outcome in head and neck cancer:A systematic review

Introduction: Head and neck cancers (HNC) are relatively fast-growing tumours, and delay in treatment initiation is associated with tumour progression and adverse outcome. An overview of factors contributing to delay can provide critical insights on necessary adjustments to optimize care pathways. This systematic review aims to identify factors associated with delay and summarize the effect of delay on oncological outcome measures. Methods: A search strategy was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines to search electronic data-bases for studies assessing the carepathway interval (days between first visit in head and neck oncology center and treatment initiation) and/or time-to-treatment-initiation interval (days between histological diagnosis and treatment initiation) and 1) determinants of delay and/or 2) effect of delay on outcome within these timeframes. Due to heterogeneity between included studies, a meta-analysis was not possible. Results: Fifty-two studies were eligible for quantitative analysis. Non-Caucasian race, academic setting, Medicaid/no insurance and radiotherapy as primary treatment were associated with delay. Advanced tumour stage was related to increased time-to-treatment initiation in the four common sites combined (oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx). Separate determinants for delay in different tumour locations were identified. In laryngeal, oral cavity cancer and the four common HNC sites combined, delay in start of treatment is associated with decreased overall survival, although no cut-off time point could be determined. Conclusion: Race, facility type, type of insurance and radiotherapy as primary treatment were associated with delay and subsequent inferior survival in the four common sites combined. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd

The effect of delayed primary treatment initiation on adverse events and recurrence in older head and neck cancer patients

Background and purpose: As a result of rapid tumor growth in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), delay in treatment initiation can result in tumor progression and inferior outcome. Especially older and frail patients are prone to develop adverse events. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of delay on development of adverse events and recurrence in older HNSCC patients. Materials and methods: This cohort study with prospectively collected data included all newly diagnosed, curatively treated HNSCC patients (>60 years) between 2015 and 2017. Time-to-treatment interval and geriatric domains were assessed. Adverse events were defined as postoperative complications (ClavienDindo classification) and acute radiation-induced toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events). Multivariable regression models were performed, using adverse events and recurrence as outcome variables. Results: A total of 245 patients were included. Median time-to-treatment was 26 days for surgery patients and 40 days for radiotherapy patients (p < 0.001). Delayed treatment initiation was not associated with postoperative complications or acute radiation-induced toxicity. Delay was significantly associated with recurrence risk within two years after treatment initiation in a model adjusted for stage and tumor location in patients treated with initial surgery (HR:4.1, 95%CI:1.2- 14.0, p = 0.024). For patients treated with radiotherapy, delay was not significantly associated with recurrence risk. Conclusion: Delayed treatment initiation was independently associated with increased recurrence risk in patients treated with initial surgery. Delay was not associated with short-term adverse events. These findings highlight the importance of establishing fast-track care pathways to minimize delays and improve especially long-term outcome. (c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Radiotherapy and Oncology 173 (2022) 154-162 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

The effect of treatment delay on quality of life and overall survival in head and neck cancer patients

OBJECTIVE: Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) are rapidly developing tumours, and substantial delay in treatment initiation is associated with decreased overall survival. The effect of delay on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of delay on QOL and overall survival. METHODS: Patients with mucosal HNSCC were prospectively included. HRQOL and 2-year overall survival were analysed using linear mixed-model analyses and cox regression, respectively. Delay was defined as care pathway interval (CPI) of ≥30 days between first consultation and treatment initiation. RESULTS: Median CPI was 39 days for the 173 patients included. A trend towards higher HRQOL-scores (indicating better HRQOL) during 2-year follow-up for patients with delay in treatment initiation was visible in the adjusted models (HRQOL summary score-β: 2.62, 95% CI: 0.57-4.67, p = 0.012). Factors associated with decreased overall survival were moderate comorbidities (HR: 5.10, 95% CI: 1.65-15.76, p = 0.005) and stage-IV tumours (HR: 12.37, 95% CI: 2.81-54.39, p = 0.001). Delay was not associated with worse overall survival. CONCLUSION: Timely treatment initiation is challenging, especially for patients with advanced tumours and initial radiotherapy treatment. Encountering delay in treatment initiation did not result in clinically relevant differences in HRQOL-scores or decreased overall survival during 2-year follow-up

Differences in the association of time to treatment initiation and survival according to various head and neck cancer sites in a nationwide cohort

Objectives: To assess whether there are differences in the effects of time to treatment interval (TTI) on patient survival for head and neck cancer (HNC) sites in order to provide evidence that can support decision-making regarding prioritizing treatment. Materials and methods: Patients in the Netherlands with a first primary HNC without distant metastasis between 2010 and 2014 were included for analysis (N = 10,486). TTI was defined as the time from pathologic diagnosis to the start of initial treatment. Overall survival (OS), cox regression analyses and cubic spline hazard models were calculated and visualized. Results: Overall, the hazard of dying was higher (HR = 1.003; 95 % CI 1.001–1.005) with each additional day until treatment initiation. The pattern, as visualized in cubic spline graphs, differed by site the hazard increased more steeply with increasing TTI for oral cavity cancer. For oropharyngeal and laryngeal cancer, a slight increase commenced after a longer TTI than for oral cavity cancer, while there was hardly an increase in hazard with increasing TTI for hypopharyngeal cancer. Conclusion: The relationship between longer TTI and decreased survival was confirmed, but slight variations in the pattern of the hazard of dying by TTI by tumour site were observed. These findings could support decisions on prioritizing treatment. However, other aspects such as extent of treatment and quality of life should be investigated further so this can also be included.</p