Coagulation testing in patients using anticoagulants

Anticoagulants such as low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), vitamin K antagonists (VKA), and the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) dabigatran and rivaroxaban are frequently used in clinical practice. Clinical laboratories analyse samples for different purposes, without knowledge of the presence of therapeutic anticoagulants, possibly leading to incorrect results. Moreover, as in emergency situations it is often unknown which anticoagulants have been used, the lack of specificity could be an issue in management of the patient. We therefore determined the influence of various anticoagulants on routine as well as dedicated coagulation tests

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) as a tool in the switch from infliximab innovator to biosimilar in rheumatic patients: results of a 12-month observational prospective cohort study

The objective of this study is to apply therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) as an objective tool to monitor the switch from infliximab innovator (INX) to infliximab biosimilar (INB) in our diverse rheumatic cohort in daily clinical practice. All rheumatic patients on INX treatment (Remicade®) and ≥18 years were switched to INB (Inflectra®) as part of routine care, but in a controlled setting. Patients were monitored by taking blood samples just before the first infusion of INB (T1), and after the second (T2), fourth (T3), and seventh (T4) infusion of INB. T4 reflects the patients’ status after ∼12 months. Infliximab trough levels, antibodies-to-infliximab (ATI), C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and validated disease activity scores (if possible) were measured. Our population consisted of 27 patients with seven different rheumatic diseases who had received INX for 143 (58–161) months (median (IQR)). Half of the patients (52%) received concomitant immunosuppressives. We found widely varying infliximab levels, with only 56% within the proposed therapeutic range of 1–5 μg/mL. One patient had very high ATI levels (>880 au/mL), and two had low ATI levels (≤30 au/mL). After switching to INB, seven patients (26%) discontinued the therapy, partially due to subjective reasons. No difference in infliximab levels, CRP levels, and disease activity scores was found between the four time points (p ≥ 0.2460). In conclusion, no pharmacokinetic or clinical differences were found between INX and INB in our diverse rheumatic cohort. TDM is a helpful tool to monitor patients switching from INX to INB

Therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab : performance evaluation of three commercial ELISA kits

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab (IFX, Remicade®) can aid to optimize therapy efficacy. Many assays are available for this purpose. However, a reference standard is lacking. Therefore, we evaluated the analytical performance, agreement and clinically relevant differences of three commercially available IFX ELISA kits on an automated processing system. METHODS: The kits of Theradiag (Lisa Tracker Infliximab), Progenika (Promonitor IFX) and apDia (Infliximab ELISA) were implemented on an automated processing system. Imprecision was determined by triplicate measurements of patient samples on five days. Agreement was evaluated by analysis of 30 patient samples and four spiked samples by the selected ELISA kits and the in-house IFX ELISA of Sanquin Diagnostics (Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Therapeutic consequences were evaluated by dividing patients into four treatment groups using cut-off levels of 1, 3 and 7 μg/mL and determining assay concordance. RESULTS: Within-run and between-run imprecision were acceptable (≤12% and ≤17%, respectively) within the quantification range of the selected ELISA kits. The apDia assay had the best precision and agreement to target values. Statistically significant differences were found between all assays except between Sanquin Diagnostics and the Lisa Tracker assay. The Promonitor assay measured the lowest IFX concentrations, the apDia assay the highest. When patients were classified in four treatment categories, 70% concordance was achieved. CONCLUSIONS: Although all assays are suitable for TDM, significant differences were observed in both imprecision and agreement. Therapeutic consequences were acceptable when patients were divided in treatment categories, but this could be improved by assay standardizatio

Determination of dabigatran and rivaroxaban by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and coagulation assays after major orthopaedic surgery

Major orthopaedic surgery is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended as thromboprophylactic agents after orthopaedic surgery. Although routine monitoring of DOACs in general is not required, measuring DOAC concentration may be necessary in clinical settings. The effects of DOACs on routine coagulation assays in spiked material are studied extensively, however, few data are available on DOAC concentration in patients after major orthopaedic surgery. We measured trough and peak DOAC concentrations with UPLC-MS/MS and routine coagulation tests in a prospective study including 40 patients receiving thromboprophylactic treatment with dabigatran 220 mg od and 40 patients receiving rivaroxaban 10 mg od after major orthopaedic surgery. For rivaroxaban, the median trough concentration with UPLC-MS/MS was 17.1 ng/mL and median peak concentration was 149 ng/mL. The anti-Xa assay displayed a good correlation, but a positive bias in comparison to the reference method. Furthermore, trough levels were mostly below the LOD of the anti-Xa assay. For dabigatran, the median trough concentration with UPLC-MS/MS was 12.1 ng/mL, and median peak level was 80.8 ng/mL. A positive bias was found when results from coagulation assays were compared to UPLC-MS/MS data. However, the addition of glucuronidated metabolites to dabigatran concentration UPLC-MS/MS data generally resolved most of this bias. Age was found to have a significant influence on dabigatran pharmacokinetics, irrespective of kidney function, whereas no effect of age was found during rivaroxaban treatment. In both treatment groups, female subjects displayed faster pharmacokinetics in comparison to male subjects, although not reaching significance. We conclude that UPLC-MS/MS is the method of choice to measure trough concentrations of DOACs in patients after orthopaedic surgery. Current coagulation assays are not suited for this purpose. We found large heterogeneity in both peak and trough concentrations of DOACs, and showed that pharmacokinetics of novel oral anticoagulants may be influenced by age and gender. Whether patients with high or low trough concentrations are at increased risk for bleeding or thromboembolic events respectively remains to be established

Switching from infliximab innovator to biosimilar in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A 12-month multicentre observational prospective cohort study

Background: Infliximab biosimilars have become available for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, data showing long-term safety and effectiveness of biosimilars in IBD patients are limited. Aim: To study prospectively the switch from infliximab innovator to biosimilar in an IBD cohort with 12 months follow-up to evaluate safety and effectiveness. Methods: Adult IBD patients from two hospitals treated with infliximab innovator (Remicade; Janssen Biotech, Horsham , Pennsylvania, USA) were switched to infliximab biosimilar (Inflectra; Hospira, Lake Forest, Illinois, USA) as part of routine care, but in a controlled setting. Blood samples were taken just before the first, second, fourth and seventh infusion of biosimilar. Infliximab trough levels, antibodies-to-infliximab (ATI), CRP and ESR were measured and disease activity scores were calculated. Results: Our cohort consisted of 133 IBD patients (64% CD, 36% UC). Before switching we found widely varying infliximab levels (median 3.5 μg/mL). ATI were detected in eight patients (6%). Most patients were in remission or had mild disease (CD: 82% UC: 90%). After switching to biosimilar, 35 patients (26%) discontinued therapy within 12 months, mostly due to subjective higher disease activity (9%) and adverse events (AE, 9.8%). AE included general malaise/fatigue (n = 7), arthralgia (n = 2), skin problems (n = 2) and infusion reactions (n = 2). No differences in IFX levels, CRP, and disease activity scores were found between the four time points (P ≥ .0917). Conclusions: We found no differences in drug levels and disease activity between infliximab innovator and biosimilar in our IBD cohort, indicating that biosimilars are safe and effective. The high proportions of discontinuers were mostly due to elective withdrawal or subjective disease worsening

Determination of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban by ultra-performance liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) and coagulation assays for therapy monitoring of novel direct oral anticoagulants

Background: Three novel direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have recently been registered by the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency Commission: dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. To quantify DOACs in plasma, various dedicated coagulation assays have been developed. Objective: To develop and validate a reference ultra-performance liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method and to evaluate the analytical performance of several coagulation assays for quantification of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. Methods: The developed UPLC-MS/MS method was validated by determination of precision, accuracy, specificity, matrix effects, lower limits of detection, carry-over, recovery, stability, and robustness. The following coagulation assays were evaluated for accuracy and precision: laboratory-developed (LD) diluted thrombin time (dTT), Hemoclot dTT, Pefakit PiCT, ECA, Liquid anti-Xa, Biophen Heparin (LRT), and Biophen DiXal anti-Xa. Agreement between the various coagulation assays and UPLC-MS/MS was determined with random samples from patients using dabigatran or rivaroxaban. Results: The UPLC-MS/MS method was shown to be accurate, precise, sensitive, stable, and robust. The dabigatran coagulation assay showing the best precision, accuracy and agreement with the UPLC-MS/MS method was the LD dTT test. For rivaroxaban, the anti-factor Xa assays were superior to the PiCT-Xa assay with regard to precision, accuracy, and agreement with the reference method. For apixaban, the Liquid anti-Xa assay was superior to the PiCT-Xa assay. Conclusions: Statistically significant differences were observed between the various coagulation assays as compared with the UPLC-MS/MS reference method. It is currently unknown whether these differences are clinically relevant. When DOACs are quantified with coagulation assays, comparison with a reference method as part of proficiency testing is therefore pivotal