The Dutch version of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis:patient-based cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties evaluation

Purpose: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) affects the appearance of spine and trunk. The Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ) assesses the perception of appearance in AIS patients. The aim of this study is to translate and culturally adapt the recommended short version of the SAQ into Dutch and to test its measurement properties. Methods: A Dutch SAQ (14-item; appearance and expectations domains) was developed following guidelines for translation and cross-cultural adaptation. The COSMIN Study Design checklist was used for measurement properties evaluation. In this multicenter study, the Dutch SAQ, SRS-22R and NPRS (back pain) were administered to 113 AIS patients (aged 15.4 years [SD 2.2], 21.2% male). Floor and ceiling effects were evaluated for content analysis. For reliability, internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) and test–retest reliability (ICC; n = 34) were evaluated. Predefined hypotheses of relationships with other questionnaires and between subgroups based on scoliosis severity (radiological and clinical) were tested for construct validity. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed to investigate the validity of the underlying structure of this 14-item questionnaire. Results: No floor and ceiling effects were found for domains and total scores. Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.84 to 0.89. ICCs varied from 0.76 to 0.77. For construct validity, 89% (8/9) of the predefined hypotheses were confirmed. Significant higher scores for the appearance domain were found for subgroups based on radiological (Cobb angle; &gt; 25.0°) and clinical outcomes. (Angle of Trunk Rotation; &gt; 9.0°). A two-factor structure was found (EV 5.13; 36.63% explained variance). Conclusion: The Dutch SAQ is an adequate, valid and reliable instrument to evaluate patients’ perception of appearance in AIS. Level of evidence: Level I—diagnostic studies.</p

Health-related quality of life in early onset scoliosis patients treated with the spring distraction system:what to expect in the first 2 years after surgery

Purpose: The Spring Distraction System (SDS) is a novel “growth-friendly” implant for the treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis (EOS). This prospective study aims to determine the evolution of the “24-Item Early-Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire” (EOSQ-24) scores during 2-year follow-up after SDS surgery. Secondary aims include investigating the relation between EOSQ-24 scores and EOS etiology, and evaluating the impact of an unplanned return to the operating room (UPROR) on HRQoL. Methods: All SDS patients with at least 2-year follow-up were included. Caregivers completed the EOSQ-24 pre-operatively, post-operatively, and at 6, 12, and 24 month follow-up. Mean total and -domain scores were graphed over time. Repeated-measures ANOVA analyzed the influence of etiology on EOSQ-24 scores. Multiple regression analyzed associations between UPRORs and EOSQ-24 scores. Results: Forty-nine patients were included. Mean total EOSQ-24 scores decreased from 70 pre-operatively to 66 post-operatively, then gradually increased to 75 (24 months). Most domains exhibited changes over time, with initial declines, but eventually surpassing pre-operative levels after 2-year follow-up. Neuromuscular/Syndromic patients had lower scores, but showed similar improvements over time compared with other etiologies. Multiple regression showed lower Parental Burden domain score (− 14 points) in patients with UPRORs, although no significant reductions were found in total score, or in other domains. Conclusion: HRQoL decreases immediately following SDS surgery but quickly recovers and exceeds pre-operative levels at 2-year follow-up in all domains. Neuromuscular/Syndromic patients have lower initial scores, but progress similarly over time. UPRORs do not influence EOSQ-24 scores, except for a negative impact on the Parental Burden domain in the short term. Level of Evidence: III.</p

Three-dimensional correction of scoliosis by a double spring reduction system as a dynamic internal brace:a pre-clinical study in Göttingen minipigs

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a major skeletal deformity that is characterized by a combination of apical rotation, lateral bending and apical lordosis. To provide full 3D correction, all these deformations should be addressed. We developed the Double Spring Reduction (DSR) system, a (growth-friendly) concept that continuously corrects the deformity through two different elements: A posterior convex Torsional Spring Implant (TSI) that provides a derotational torque at the apex, and a concave Spring Distraction System (SDS), which provides posterior, concave distraction to restore thoracic kyphosis. PURPOSE: To determine whether the DSR components are able to correct an induced idiopathic-like scoliosis and to compare correction realized by the TSI alone to correction enforced by the complete DSR implant. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Preclinical randomized animal cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Twelve growing Göttingen minipigs. OUTCOME MEASURES: Coronal Cobb angle, T10-L3 lordosis/kyphosis, apical axial rotation, relative anterior lengthening. METHODS: All mini-pigs received the TSI with a contralateral tether to induce an idiopathic-like scoliosis with apical rotation (mean Cobb: 20.4°; mean axial apical rotation: 13.1°, mean lordosis: 4.9°). After induction, the animals were divided into two groups: One group (N=6) was corrected by TSI only (TSI only-group), another group (N=6) was corrected by a combination of TSI and SDS (DSR-group). 3D spinal morphology on CT was compared between groups over time. After 2 months of correction, animals were euthanized. RESULTS: Both intervention groups showed excellent apical derotation (TSI only-group: 15.0° to 5.4°; DSR-group: 11.2° to 3.5°). The TSI only-group showed coronal Cobb improvement from 22.5° to 6.0°, while the DSR-group overcorrected the 18.3° Cobb to -9.2°. Lordosis was converted to kyphosis in both groups (TSI only-group: -4.6° to 4.3°; DSR-group: -5.2° to 25.0°) which was significantly larger in the DSR-group (p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The TSI alone realized strong apical derotation and moderate correction in the coronal and sagittal plane. The addition of distraction on the posterior concavity resulted in more coronal correction and reversal of induced lordosis into physiological kyphosis. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study shows that dynamic spring forces could be a viable method to guide the spine towards healthy alignment, without fusing it or inhibiting its growth

A reliability and validity study for different coronal angles using ultrasound imaging in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Background Context: Radiation exposure remains a big concern in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Ultrasound imaging of the spine could significantly reduce or possibly even eliminate this radiation hazard. The spinous processes (SPs) and transverse processes (TPs) were used to measure the coronal deformity. Both landmarks provided reliable information on the severity of the curve as related to the traditional Cobb angle. However, it remained unclear which coronal ultrasound angle is the most appropriate method to measure the curve severity. Purpose: The objective of this study was to test the reliability and the validity of several ultrasound angle measurements in the coronal plane as compared with the radiographic coronal Cobb angle in patients with AIS. Study Design/Setting: This is a cross-sectional study. Patient Sample: The study included 33 patients with AIS, both male and female (Cobb angle range: 3°-90°, primary and secondary curves), who underwent posterior-anterior radiography of the spine. Outcome Measures: The outcome measures were the reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs] for the intra- and interobserver variabilities) and the validity (linear regression analysis and Bland-Altman method, including the mean absolute difference [MAD]) of different ultrasound measurements. Materials and Methods: The patients were scanned using a dedicated ultrasound machine (Scolioscan, Telefield Medical Imaging Ltd, Hong Kong). The reliability and the validity were tested for three coronal ultrasound angles: an automatic and manual SP angle and a manual TP angle as compared with the radiographic coronal main thoracic or (thoraco)lumbar Cobb angles. Results: The ICC showed very reliable measurements of all ultrasound methods (ICC ≥0.84). The ultrasound angles were 15%-37% smaller as compared with the Cobb angles; however, excellent linear correlations were seen between all ultrasound angles and the Cobb angle (thoracic: R 2≥0.987 and (thoraco)lumbar R 2≥0.970), and the Bland-Altman plot showed a good agreement between all ultrasound angles and the Cobb angle. The MADs of the ultrasound angles, corrected using the linear regression equation, and the Cobb angles showed no significant difference between the different ultrasound angles (MAD: automatic SP angle 4.9°±3.2°, manual SP angle 4.5°±3.1°, and manual TP angle 4.7°±3.6°; p≥.388). Conclusions: Coronal ultrasound angles are based on different landmarks than the traditional Cobb angle measurement and cannot represent the same angle values. In this study, we found excellent correlations between the ultrasound and Cobb measurements, without differences in the reliability and validity between the ultrasound angles based on the SPs and TPs. Therefore, the severity of the deformity in patients with AIS can be assessed by ultrasound imaging, avoiding hazardous ionizing radiation and enabling more individualized patient care. It also opens possibilities for screening

Trigonometric algorithm defining the true three-dimensional acetabular cup orientation: Correlation between measured and calculated cup orientation angles

Background: Acetabular cup orientation plays a key role in implant stability and the success of total hip arthroplasty. To date, the orientation has been measured with different imaging modalities and definitions, leading to lack of consensus on optimal cup placement. A 3-dimensional (3D) concept involving a trigonometric description enables unambiguous definitions. Our objective was to test the validity and reliability of a 3D trigonometric description of cuporientation.Methods: Computed tomographic scans of the pelvis, performed for vascular assessment of 20 patients with 22 primary total hip replacements in situ, were systematically collected. On multiplanar reconstructions, 3 observers independently measured cup orientation retrospectively in terms of coronal inclination, sagittal tilt, and transverse version. The angles measured in 2 planes were used to calculate the angle in the third plane via a trigonometric algorithm. For correlation and reliability analyses, intraobserver and interobserver differences between measured and calculated angles were evaluated with use of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).Results: Measured and calculated angles had ICCs of 0.953 for coronal inclination, 0.985 for sagittal tilt, and 0.982 for transverse version. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability had ICCs of 0.987 and 0.987, respectively, for coronal inclination; 0.979 and 0.981, respectively, for sagittal tilt; and 0.992 and 0.978, respectively, for transverse version.Conclusions: The 3D concept with its trigonometric algorithm is a valid and reliable tool for the measurement of cup orientation.Clinical Relevance: By calculating the transverse version of cups from coronal inclination and sagittal tilt measurements, the trigonometric algorithm enables a 3D definition of cup orientation, regardless of the imaging modality used. In addition, it introduces sagittal tilt that, like pelvic tilt, rotates around the transverse axis.Biomaterials & Tissue Biomechanic

The changing position of the center of mass of the thorax during growth in relation to pre-existent vertebral rotation

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the thoracic center of mass (COM) position of children at different ages and evaluate its relation with the previously reported pre-existent rotational pattern of the normal spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The normal, nonscoliotic thoracic spine is known to have a rotational pattern that changes direction during growth, a transition from left-sided toward right-sided rotation with increasing age. This matches the changing curve convexity seen when idiopathic scoliosis develops at different ages. Furthermore, the direction of pre-existent rotation was shown to be related to organ orientation; in situs inversus the rotation is opposite to situs solitus. METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) scans of the thorax of infantile (0-4 years, n = 40), juvenile (4-10 years, n = 53), and adolescent (10-18 years, n = 62) children without spinal pathology were included from an existing database. The location of the COM inside the thorax was calculated based on Hounsfield-units, representing tissue mass. The COM offset was defined as the shortest distance to the midsagittal plane. RESULTS: At the infantile age, the COM was 2.5 ± 2.1 mm on the right side, at juvenile age not significantly deviated, and at adolescent age 3.1 ± 2.3 mm on the left side of the midsagittal plane. The mean COM offset correlated linearly with age (r = 0.77, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The COM shifts from slightly on the right side of the thorax at the infantile age, to neutral at juvenile age, to the left at adolescent age. This corresponds to the earlier demonstrated change in direction of pre-existent rotation in the normal spine with age, as well as with the well-known changing direction, from left to right, of thoracic curve convexity in scoliosis at different ages. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/ A

Three-dimensional correction of scoliosis by a double spring reduction system as a dynamic internal brace: a pre-clinical study in Göttingen minipigs

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a major skeletal deformity that is characterized by a combination of apical rotation, lateral bending and apical lordosis. To provide full 3D correction, all these deformations should be addressed. We developed the Double Spring Reduction (DSR) system, a (growth-friendly) concept that continuously corrects the deformity through two different elements: A posterior convex Torsional Spring Implant (TSI) that provides a derotational torque at the apex, and a concave Spring Distraction System (SDS), which provides posterior, concave distraction to restore thoracic kyphosis. PURPOSE: To determine whether the DSR components are able to correct an induced idiopathic-like scoliosis and to compare correction realized by the TSI alone to correction enforced by the complete DSR implant. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Preclinical randomized animal cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Twelve growing Göttingen minipigs. OUTCOME MEASURES: Coronal Cobb angle, T10-L3 lordosis/kyphosis, apical axial rotation, relative anterior lengthening. METHODS: All mini-pigs received the TSI with a contralateral tether to induce an idiopathic-like scoliosis with apical rotation (mean Cobb: 20.4°; mean axial apical rotation: 13.1°, mean lordosis: 4.9°). After induction, the animals were divided into two groups: One group (N=6) was corrected by TSI only (TSI only-group), another group (N=6) was corrected by a combination of TSI and SDS (DSR-group). 3D spinal morphology on CT was compared between groups over time. After 2 months of correction, animals were euthanized. RESULTS: Both intervention groups showed excellent apical derotation (TSI only-group: 15.0° to 5.4°; DSR-group: 11.2° to 3.5°). The TSI only-group showed coronal Cobb improvement from 22.5° to 6.0°, while the DSR-group overcorrected the 18.3° Cobb to -9.2°. Lordosis was converted to kyphosis in both groups (TSI only-group: -4.6° to 4.3°; DSR-group: -5.2° to 25.0°) which was significantly larger in the DSR-group (p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The TSI alone realized strong apical derotation and moderate correction in the coronal and sagittal plane. The addition of distraction on the posterior concavity resulted in more coronal correction and reversal of induced lordosis into physiological kyphosis. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study shows that dynamic spring forces could be a viable method to guide the spine towards healthy alignment, without fusing it or inhibiting its growth

Surgical Outcomes of Anterior Versus Posterior Fusion in Lenke Type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To describe surgical results in two and three dimensions and patient-reported outcomes of scoliosis treatment for Lenke type 1 idiopathic curves with an open anterior or posterior approach. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Different surgical techniques have been described to prevent curve progression and to restore spinal alignment in idiopathic scoliosis. The spine can be accessed via an anterior or a posterior approach. However, the surgical outcomes, especially in three dimensions, for different surgical approaches remain unclear. METHODS: Cohorts of Lenke curve type 1 idiopathic scoliosis patients, after anterior or posterior spinal fusion were recruited, to measure curve characteristics on conventional radiographs, before and after surgery and after 2 years follow-up, whereas the vertebral axial rotation, true mid-sagittal anterior-posterior height ratio of individual structures, and spinal height differences were measured on 3D reconstructions of the pre- and postoperative supine low-dose computed tomography (CT) scans. Additionally, the intraoperative parameters were described and the patients completed the Scoliosis Research Society outcomes and the 3-level version of EuroQol Group questionnaires postoperatively. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients with Lenke curve type 1 idiopathic scoliosis (26 in the anterior cohort and 27 in the posterior cohort) were analyzed. Fewer vertebrae were instrumented in the anterior cohort compared with the posterior cohort (P < 0.001), with less surgery time and lower intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.001). The Cobb angle correction of the primary thoracic curve directly after surgery was 57 ± 12% in the anterior cohort and 73 ± 12% in the posterior cohort (P < 0.001) and 55 ± 13% and 66 ± 12% (P = 0.001) at 2 years follow-up. Postoperative 3D alignment restoration and questionnaires showed no significant differences between the cohorts. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that Lenke type 1 curves can be effectively managed surgically with either an open anterior or posterior approach. Each approach, however, has specific advantages and challenges, as described in this study, which must be considered before treating each patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Surgical Outcomes of Anterior Versus Posterior Fusion in Lenke Type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To describe surgical results in two and three dimensions and patient-reported outcomes of scoliosis treatment for Lenke type 1 idiopathic curves with an open anterior or posterior approach. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Different surgical techniques have been described to prevent curve progression and to restore spinal alignment in idiopathic scoliosis. The spine can be accessed via an anterior or a posterior approach. However, the surgical outcomes, especially in three dimensions, for different surgical approaches remain unclear. METHODS: Cohorts of Lenke curve type 1 idiopathic scoliosis patients, after anterior or posterior spinal fusion were recruited, to measure curve characteristics on conventional radiographs, before and after surgery and after 2 years follow-up, whereas the vertebral axial rotation, true mid-sagittal anterior-posterior height ratio of individual structures, and spinal height differences were measured on 3D reconstructions of the pre- and postoperative supine low-dose computed tomography (CT) scans. Additionally, the intraoperative parameters were described and the patients completed the Scoliosis Research Society outcomes and the 3-level version of EuroQol Group questionnaires postoperatively. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients with Lenke curve type 1 idiopathic scoliosis (26 in the anterior cohort and 27 in the posterior cohort) were analyzed. Fewer vertebrae were instrumented in the anterior cohort compared with the posterior cohort (P < 0.001), with less surgery time and lower intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.001). The Cobb angle correction of the primary thoracic curve directly after surgery was 57 ± 12% in the anterior cohort and 73 ± 12% in the posterior cohort (P < 0.001) and 55 ± 13% and 66 ± 12% (P = 0.001) at 2 years follow-up. Postoperative 3D alignment restoration and questionnaires showed no significant differences between the cohorts. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that Lenke type 1 curves can be effectively managed surgically with either an open anterior or posterior approach. Each approach, however, has specific advantages and challenges, as described in this study, which must be considered before treating each patient.3