37 research outputs found

    Pharmacokinetics of the multidrug-resistance-converting drug dexniguldipine and its pyridine metabolite M-1 in the plasma, tumor, and renal tissue of tumor-bearing Wag/Rij rats

    Get PDF
    The pharmacokinetics of oral dexniguldipine, a new multidrug-resistance- modifying agent under clinical evaluation, and its pyridine metabolite M-1 were determined in plasma, tumor, and renal tissue in Wag/Rij rats bearing a multidrug-resistant CC531 colon adenocarcinoma tumor under the renal capsule. The pharmacokinetics were studied in four experiments. After a single administration of dexniguldipine (30 mg/kg), tumors and kidneys were collected after 5 (experiment 1), 24 (experiment 2), and 48 h (experiment 3). In the fourth experiment, dexniguldipine was given once daily for 3 consecutive days at a dose of 30 mg/kg. In all experiments, plasma samples were collected at regular intervals. The concentrations of dexniguldipine and M-1 could be determined in plasma in most of the rats at up to 32 h after drug administration. The area under the curve (AUC) of dexniguldipine and M- 1 varied by a factor of 2-6 in the four experiments. High tumor-tissue concentrations of dexniguldipine were observed. The concentrations were highest in the multiple-dose experiment (2014 ± 1005 ng/g tissue). High degrees of correlation (>08) were established between the concentrations of dexniguldipine measured in plasma and tumor as well as renal tissue. Overall, tumor-tissue concentrations of M-1 comprised one-third of the dexniguldipine concentrations measured

    Modulation of multidrug resistance with dexniguldipine hydrochloride (B8509-035) in the CC531 rot colon carcinoma model

    Get PDF
    The chemosensitizing potency of dexniguldipine hydrochloride (B8509-035) on epidoxorubicin was assessed in a multidrug-resistant (MDR) tumour model, the intrinsic MDR rat colon carcinoma CC531. In vitro in the sulphorhodamine B cell-viability assay the cytotoxicity of epidoxorubicin was increased approximately 15-fold by co-incubation with 50 ng/ml dexniguldipine. In vivo concentrations of dexniguldipine 5 h after a single oral dose of 30 mg/kg were 72 (± 19 SD) ng/ml in plasma and 925 (± 495 SD) ng/g in tumour tissue. Levels of the metabolite of dexniguldipine, M-1, which has the same chemosensitizing potential, were 26 (± 6 SD) ng/ml and 289 (± 127 SD) ng/g respectively. The efficacy of treatment with 6 mg/kg epidoxorubicin applied intravenously combined with 30 mg kg-1 day-1 dexniguldipine administered orally for 3 days prior to epidoxorubicin injection was evaluated on tumours grown under the renal capsule. Dexniguldipine alone did not show antitumour effects in vivo. Dexniguldipine modestly, but consistently, potentiated the tumour-growth-inhibiting effect of epidoxorubicin, reaching statistical significance in two out of four experiments. In conclusion, these experiments show that dexniguldipine has potency as an MDR reverter in vitro and in vivo in this solid MDR tumour model

    Discovering novel germline genetic variants linked to severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity in- and outside <i>DPYD</i>

    Get PDF
    Background: The Alpe-DPD study (NCT02324452) demonstrated that prospective genotyping and dose-individualization using four alleles in DPYD (DPYD*2A/rs3918290, c.1236G &gt; A/rs75017182, c.2846A &gt; T/rs67376798 and c.1679 T &gt; G/rs56038477) can mitigate the risk of severe fluoropyrimidine toxicity. However, this could not prevent all toxicities. The goal of this study was to identify additional genetic variants, both inside and outside DPYD, that may contribute to fluoropyrimidine toxicity. Methods: Biospecimens and data from the Alpe-DPD study were used. Exon sequencing was performed to identify risk variants inside DPYD. In silico and in vitro analyses were used to classify DPYD variants. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) with severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity was performed to identify variants outside DPYD. Association with severe toxicity was assessed using matched-pair analyses for the exon sequencing and logistic, Cox, and ordinal regression analyses for GWAS. Results: Twenty-four non-synonymous, frameshift, and splice site DPYD variants were detected in ten of 986 patients. Seven of these variants (c.1670C &gt; T, c.1913 T &gt; C, c.1925 T &gt; C, c.506delC, c.731A &gt; C, c.1740 + 1G &gt; T, c.763 − 2A &gt; G) were predicted to be deleterious. The carriers of either of these variants showed a trend towards a 2.14-fold (95% CI, 0.41–11.3, P = 0.388) increased risk of severe toxicity compared to matched controls (N = 30). After GWAS of 942 patients, no individual single nucleotide polymorphisms achieved genome-wide significance (P ≤ 5 × 10−8), however, five variants were suggestive of association (P &lt; 5 × 10−6) with severe toxicity. Conclusions: Results from DPYD exon sequencing and GWAS analysis did not identify additional genetic variants associated with severe toxicity, which suggests that testing for single markers at a population level currently has limited clinical value. Identifying additional variants on an individual level is still promising to explain fluoropyrimidine-related severe toxicity. In addition, studies with larger samples sizes, in more diverse cohorts are needed to identify potential clinically relevant genetic variants related to severe fluoropyrimidine toxicity.</p

    Discovering novel germline genetic variants linked to severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity in- and outside DPYD

    Get PDF
    Background: The Alpe-DPD study (NCT02324452) demonstrated that prospective genotyping and dose-individualization using four alleles in DPYD (DPYD*2A/rs3918290, c.1236G > A/rs75017182, c.2846A > T/rs67376798 and c.1679 T > G/rs56038477) can mitigate the risk of severe fluoropyrimidine toxicity. However, this could not prevent all toxicities. The goal of this study was to identify additional genetic variants, both inside and outside DPYD, that may contribute to fluoropyrimidine toxicity. Methods: Biospecimens and data from the Alpe-DPD study were used. Exon sequencing was performed to identify risk variants inside DPYD. In silico and in vitro analyses were used to classify DPYD variants. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) with severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity was performed to identify variants outside DPYD. Association with severe toxicity was assessed using matched-pair analyses for the exon sequencing and logistic, Cox, and ordinal regression analyses for GWAS. Results: Twenty-four non-synonymous, frameshift, and splice site DPYD variants were detected in ten of 986 patients. Seven of these variants (c.1670C > T, c.1913 T > C, c.1925 T > C, c.506delC, c.731A > C, c.1740 + 1G > T, c.763 − 2A > G) were predicted to be deleterious. The carriers of either of these variants showed a trend towards a 2.14-fold (95% CI, 0.41–11.3, P = 0.388) increased risk of severe toxicity compared to matched controls (N = 30). After GWAS of 942 patients, no individual single nucleotide polymorphisms achieved genome-wide significance (P ≤ 5 × 10−8), however, five variants were suggestive of association (P < 5 × 10−6) with severe toxicity. Conclusions: Results from DPYD exon sequencing and GWAS analysis did not identify additional genetic variants associated with severe toxicity, which suggests that testing for single markers at a population level currently has limited clinical value. Identifying additional variants on an individual level is still promising to explain fluoropyrimidine-related severe toxicity. In addition, studies with larger samples sizes, in more diverse cohorts are needed to identify potential clinically relevant genetic variants related to severe fluoropyrimidine toxicity

    Design of multi-functional semitrailer

    No full text
    corecore