Instrumented measurement of glenohumeral joint laxity: reliability and normative data

This study assessed shoulder laxity using an instrumented arthrometer. We compared anterior and posterior translations at various force levels to determine the reliability of our measurement technique and to provide normative data in healthy shoulders. Fifty shoulders were assessed for glenohumeral joint laxity in two directions (anterior and posterior) and at four force levels (67, 89, 111, and 134 N). The dependent measure was joint displacement. Laxity values were widely, yet normally, distributed in our group of healthy shoulders. Intraclass correlation coefficients revealed excellent between-trial reliability (0.92) and fair between-session (0.73) and between-examiner (0.74) reliability. The average standard error of measurement between trials (0.56 mm), sessions (1.5 mm), and examiners (1.7 mm) demonstrated an unprecedentedly high degree of precision for quantifying glenohumeral joint laxity. Paired t tests revealed no significant laxity differences between sides ( P >0.05), indicating bilateral symmetry. A 2 (direction) × 4 (force) analysis of variance revealed significant differences in laxity between directions ( P <0.0001) and force levels ( P <0.0001). Our results show that our instrumented technique for quantifying glenohumeral joint laxity is precise and reproducible. Posterior translation was significantly greater than anterior, and a significant increase in translation was observed between increasing levels of force.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/41911/1/167-9-1-34_s001670000174.pd