Lateral abdominal wall hematoma as a rare complication after carotid artery stenting: a case report

Abdominal wall hematoma is a rare and life-threatening complication after carotid artery stenting (CAS), but it can occur when activated clotting time is prolonged. We report a right lateral abdominal wall hematoma caused by rupture of the superficial circumflex iliac artery after CAS in a 72-year-old man with severe stenosis of the origin of the right internal carotid artery. We performed CAS for the targeted lesion while activated clotting time exceeded 300 seconds. After 2 hours, he complained of right lateral abdominal pain. Abdominal computed tomography revealed an extensive hematoma in the right lateral abdominal wall. Activated clotting time was 180 seconds at this point. Seven hours later, he developed hypotension and hemoglobin level dropped to 11.3 g/dl. Subsequent computed tomography showed enlargement of the hematoma. Emergent selective angiography of the external iliac artery revealed active bleeding from the right superficial circumflex iliac artery. Transcatheter arterial embolization with Gelfoam and microcoils was performed successfully. With more CAS procedures being performed, it is important for endovascular surgeons and radiologists to consider the possibility of abdominal wall hematoma in this situation

トクシマ ダイガク ビョウイン ノウソッチュウ センター デノ ナイケイドウミャク キュウセイ ヘイソク ニ タイスル チリョウ センリャク

Objective : Strokes related to acute internal carotid artery （ICA） occlusion are associated with extremely poor prognosis. Recently, some studies have reported that the prognosis has been getting better by treating with intra-arterial endovascular therapy. We sought to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke attributable to ICA occlusion treated with intraarterial endovascular therapy or otherwise. Methods : We reviewed ４４ patients who underwent treatment with intra-arterial endovascular therapy or otherwise in our stroke care unit （SCU） from January, ２０１１ to May, ２０１４. We compared the prognosis of patients in the ２ treatment groups （endovascular group, n＝２３ vs nonendovascular group, n＝２１）. Results : The rate of good prognosis （modified Rankin Score of ≦２） was significantly higher in the endovascular group than non-endovascular group （１７．４％ vs０％，p＝０．０４５）. The rate of patients who had extreme improvements of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale （NIHSS） ≧８ was higher in the endovascular group than non-endovascular group （３０．４％ vs１４．３％）. Concerning the improvement of NIHSS ≧８, recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator （rt-PA） or the left side ICA occlusion were associated significantly （p＝０．０１９, p＝０．０４２, respectively）. Although the hypothesis that endovascular therapy could contribute to extreme improvements of NIHSS wasn’t proved （p＝０．２０２）, there was one case that NIHSS was dramatically improved from ２２ to ０ by endovascular therapy. Conclusions : Intra-arterial endovascular therapy of ICA occlusion might result in improved clinical outcomes for indicated cases