NO-Donating Aspirin and Aspirin Partially Inhibit Age-Related Atherosclerosis but Not Radiation-Induced Atherosclerosis in ApoE Null Mice

BACKGROUND: We previously showed that irradiation to the carotid arteries of ApoE(-/-) mice accelerated the development of macrophage-rich, inflammatory atherosclerotic lesions, prone to intra-plaque hemorrhage. In this study we investigated the potential of anti-inflammatory and anti-coagulant intervention strategies to inhibit age-related and radiation-induced atherosclerosis. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: ApoE(-/-) mice were given 0 or 14 Gy to the neck and the carotid arteries and aortic arches were harvested at 4 or 30 weeks after irradiation. Nitric oxide releasing aspirin (NCX 4016, 60 mg/kg/day) or aspirin (ASA, 30 or 300 mg/kg/day) were given continuously in the chow. High dose ASA effectively blocked platelet aggregation, while the low dose ASA or NCX 4016 had no significant effect on platelet aggregation. High dose ASA, but not NCX 4016, inhibited endothelial cell expression of VCAM-1 and thrombomodulin in the carotid arteries at 4 weeks after irradiation; eNOS and ICAM-1 levels were unchanged. After 30 weeks of follow-up, NCX 4016 significantly reduced the total number of lesions and the number of initial macrophage-rich lesions in the carotid arteries of unirradiated mice, but these effects were not seen in the brachiocephalic artery of the aortic arch (BCA). In contrast, high dose ASA lead to a decrease in the number of initial lesions in the BCA, but not in the carotid artery. Both high dose ASA and NCX 4016 reduced the collagen content of advanced lesions and increased the total plaque burden in the BCA of unirradiated mice. At 30 weeks after irradiation, neither NCX 4016 nor ASA significantly influenced the number or distribution of lesions, but high dose ASA lead to formation of collagen-rich "stable" advanced lesions in carotid arteries. The total plaque area of the irradiated BCA was increased after ASA, but the plaque burden was very low compared with the carotid artery. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The development and characteristics of radiation-induced atherosclerosis varied between different arteries but could not be circumvented by anti-inflammatory and anti-coagulant therapies. This implicates other underlying mechanistic pathways compared to age-related atherosclerosis

Is There an Indication for Digital Subtraction Angiography in the Assessment of Irradiation-Induced Vascular Damage before Free Flap Surgery by the Means of the Internal Mammary Vessels?

Secondary breast reconstruction is increasingly performed after postmastectomy radiotherapy. Damage to blood vessel walls is one of the adverse effects of irradiation therapy, which may jeopardize reconstructive free flap surgery. It would be of great importance to be informed about the quality of the recipient vessel before reconstructive surgery. The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the value of preoperative angiography in the assessment of radiation-induced arterial damage and to relate the findings to the degree of vascular damage found during the operation and with histology. This study included women who had been treated with thoracic radiotherapy and required free flap breast reconstruction. Preoperative angiographic, intraoperative quality and histological findings of vessels were scored and compared together with the occurrence of postoperative complications. In 34 patients a total of 40 free flaps breast reconstruction were performed. Total 21 internal mammary arteries had been within the field of irradiation. In only two out of six patients with aberrant angiographies the internal mammary artery has been within the field of irradiation. This study concludes that damage to the internal mammary vessels cannot always be detected preoperatively by angiography, or even by intraoperative examination