Wide antral circumferential vs. ostial pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation—the butterfly effect

BackgroundWide antral circumferential ablation (WACA) in comparison to ostial pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) has been attributed with improved rhythm outcome. We investigated the feasibility, lesion formation, and rhythm outcome of WACA-PVI in comparison to ostial-PVI using pulsed field ablation (PFA).MethodsSymptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) patients (69 years, 67% male; 67% paroxysmal AF) were prospectively enrolled into our single-center registry and underwent first-time ostial-PFA or WACA-PFA, N = 15 each. In all patients, eight pulse trains (2 kV/2.5 s, bipolar, biphasic, 4× basket/flower configuration each) were delivered to each PV. In WACA-PFA, two extra pulse trains in a flower configuration were added to the anterior and posterior antrum of the PVs. For comparison of PFA lesion size, pre- and post-ablation left atrial (LA) voltage maps were acquired using a multipolar spiral catheter together with a three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping system.ResultsWACA-PFA resulted in a significant larger lesion formation than ostial-PFA (45.5 vs. 35.1 cm2, p = 0.001) with bilateral overlapping butterfly shape-like lesions and concomitant posterior LA wall isolation in 73% of patients. This was not associated with increased procedure time, sedation dosage, or exposure to radiation. One-year freedom from AF recurrence was numerically higher after WACA-PFA than ostial-PFA (94% vs. 87%) but not statistically significant (p = 0.68). No organized atrial tachycardias (ATs) were observed. Ostial-PFA patients more often underwent re-ablation due to recurrent AF episodes.ConclusionWACA-PFA is feasible and resulted in significantly wider lesion sets than ostial-PFA. Concomitant posterior LA wall isolation occurred as an epiphenomenon in the majority of patients. The WACA approach was associated with neither increased procedure and fluoroscopy times nor statistically significant differences in 1-year rhythm outcome. ATs were absent

Safety and Feasibility of Catheter Ablation Procedures in Patients with Bleeding Disorders

AIMS/OBJECTIVES Patients with bleeding disorders are a rare and complex population in catheter ablation (CA) procedures. The most common types of bleeding disorders are von Willebrand disease (VWD) and hemophilia A (HA). Patients with VWD or HA tend to have a higher risk of bleeding complications compared to other patients. There is a lack of data concerning peri- and postinterventional coagulation treatment. We sought to assess the optimal management of patients with VWD and HA referred for catheter ablation procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS In this study, we analyzed patients with VWD or HA undergoing CA procedures at two centers in Germany and Switzerland between 2016 and 2021. Clotting factors were administered in conjunction with hemostaseological recommendations. CA was performed as per the institutional standard. During the procedure, unfractionated heparin (UFH) was given intravenously with respect to the activated clotting time (ACT). Primary endpoints included the feasibility of the procedure, bleeding complications, and thromboembolic events during the procedure. Secondary endpoints included bleeding complications and thromboembolic events up to one year after catheter ablation. A total of seven patients (three VWD Type I, one VWD Type IIa, three HA) underwent 10 catheter ablation procedures (pulmonary vein isolation (PVI): two × radiofrequency (RF), one × laser balloon (LB), one × cryoballoon (CB); PVI + cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI): one × RF; PVI + left atrial appendage isolation (LAAI): one × RF; Premature ventricular contraction (PVC): three × RF; Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT): one × RF). VWD patients received 2000-3000 IE Wilate i.v. 30 to 45 min prior to ablation. Patients with HA received 2000-3000 IE factor VIII before the procedure. All patients undergoing PVI received UFH (cumulative dose 9000-18,000 IE) with a target ACT of >300 s. All patients after PVI were started on oral anticoagulation (OAC) 12 h after ablation. Two patients received aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid; ASA) for 4 weeks after the ablation of left-sided PVCs. No anticoagulation was prescribed after slow pathway modulation in a case with AVNRT. No bleeding complications or thromboembolic events were reported. During a follow-up of one year, one case of gastrointestinal bleeding occurred following OAC withdrawal after LAA occlusion. CONCLUSIONS After the substitution of clotting factors, catheter ablation in patients with VWD and HA seems to be safe and feasible

Safety and Feasibility of Catheter Ablation Procedures in Patients with Bleeding Disorders

Aims/Objectives: Patients with bleeding disorders are a rare and complex population in catheter ablation (CA) procedures. The most common types of bleeding disorders are von Willebrand disease (VWD) and hemophilia A (HA). Patients with VWD or HA tend to have a higher risk of bleeding complications compared to other patients. There is a lack of data concerning peri- and postinterventional coagulation treatment. We sought to assess the optimal management of patients with VWD and HA referred for catheter ablation procedures. Methods and Results: In this study, we analyzed patients with VWD or HA undergoing CA procedures at two centers in Germany and Switzerland between 2016 and 2021. Clotting factors were administered in conjunction with hemostaseological recommendations. CA was performed as per the institutional standard. During the procedure, unfractionated heparin (UFH) was given intravenously with respect to the activated clotting time (ACT). Primary endpoints included the feasibility of the procedure, bleeding complications, and thromboembolic events during the procedure. Secondary endpoints included bleeding complications and thromboembolic events up to one year after catheter ablation. A total of seven patients (three VWD Type I, one VWD Type IIa, three HA) underwent 10 catheter ablation procedures (pulmonary vein isolation (PVI): two × radiofrequency (RF), one × laser balloon (LB), one × cryoballoon (CB); PVI + cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI): one × RF; PVI + left atrial appendage isolation (LAAI): one × RF; Premature ventricular contraction (PVC): three × RF; Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT): one × RF). VWD patients received 2000–3000 IE Wilate i.v. 30 to 45 min prior to ablation. Patients with HA received 2000–3000 IE factor VIII before the procedure. All patients undergoing PVI received UFH (cumulative dose 9000–18,000 IE) with a target ACT of >300 s. All patients after PVI were started on oral anticoagulation (OAC) 12 h after ablation. Two patients received aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid; ASA) for 4 weeks after the ablation of left-sided PVCs. No anticoagulation was prescribed after slow pathway modulation in a case with AVNRT. No bleeding complications or thromboembolic events were reported. During a follow-up of one year, one case of gastrointestinal bleeding occurred following OAC withdrawal after LAA occlusion. Conclusions: After the substitution of clotting factors, catheter ablation in patients with VWD and HA seems to be safe and feasible

Pulmonary vein isolation durability after very high-power short-duration ablation utilizing a very-close protocol – The FAST AND FURIOUS redo study

Background: Very high-power short-duration (vHP-SD) radiofrequency (RF) ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment by pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) aims for safer, more effective and faster procedures. Although acute efficacy and safety for PVI was recently shown data on chronic PVI durability is limited. Here chronic PVI durability was evaluated during repeat electrophysiological procedures in patients after initial vHP-SD and conventional RF based PVI. Methods: A total of 25 consecutive patients with repeat left atrial procedures after initial vHP-SD based PVI were included in this study. Twenty-five patients with previous conventional RF based PVI and repeat left atrial procedures served as control (control group). Results: For index procedures the median RF time was 328 (277, 392) seconds (vHP-SD) and 1470 (1310, 1742) seconds (control); p < 0.001, the median procedure time was 55 (53, 68) minutes (vHP-SD) and 110 (94, 119) (control); p < 0.001). First pass isolation rate was 84 % (vHP-SD) and 88 % (control, p = 0.888). No differences for severe adverse events (vHP-SD: 1/25, 4 % vs. control: 0/25, 0 %; p = 0.676 were detected.Chronic durability of all PVs was assessed in vHP-SD: 16/25 (64 %) and control: 8/25 (32 %) patients (p = 0.023) and vHP-SD: 81 % and control: 62 % of PVs were found to be isolated (p = 0.003). For right PVs vHP-SD: 84 % vs. control: 60 % of PVs (p < 0.001) and for left PVs vHP-SD: 78 % vs. control: 64 % (p = 0.123) were found to be isolated. Conclusions: PVI solely utilizing vHP-SD via a very close-protocol provides fast, safe and effective acute PVI. High rates of chronically isolated pulmonary veins have been detected