A comparison of X-ray stress measurement methods \\based on the fundamental equation

Stress measurement methods using X-ray diffraction (XRD methods) are based on so-called fundamental equations. The fundamental equation is described in the coordinate system that best suites the measurement situation, and, thus, making a comparison between different XRD methods is not straightforward. However, by using the diffraction vector representation, the fundamental equations of different methods become identical. Furthermore, the differences between the various XRD methods are in the choice of diffraction vectors and the way of calculating the stress from the measured data. The stress calculation methods can also be unified using the general least-squares method, which is a common least-squares method of multivariate analysis. Thus, the only difference between these methods turns out to be in the choice of the set of diffraction vectors. In light of these ideas, we compare three commonly used XRD methods: the sin^2 psi method, the XRD^2 method, and the cos alpha method using the estimation of the measurement errors

Separability of N-particle Fermionic States for Arbitrary Partitions

We present a criterion of separability for arbitrary s partitions of N-particle fermionic pure states. We show that, despite the superficial non-factorizability due to the antisymmetry required by the indistinguishability of the particles, the states which meet our criterion have factorizable correlations for a class of observables which are specified consistently with the states. The separable states and the associated class of observables share an orthogonal structure, whose non-uniqueness is found to be intrinsic to the multi-partite separability and leads to the non-transitivity in the factorizability in general. Our result generalizes the previous result obtained by Ghirardi et. al. [J. Stat. Phys. 108 (2002) 49] for the s = 2 and s = N case.Comment: 21 pages, 2 figure

Security of differential quadrature phase shift quantum key distribution

One of the simplest methods for implementing quantum key distribution over fiber-optic communication is the Bennett-Brassard 1984 protocol with phase encoding (PE-BB84 protocol), in which the sender uses phase modulation over double pulses from a laser and the receiver uses a passive delayed interferometer. Using essentially the same setup and by regarding a train of many pulses as a single block, one can carry out the so-called differential quadrature phase shift (DQPS) protocol, which is a variant of differential phase shift (DPS) protocols. Here we prove the security of the DQPS protocol based on an adaptation of proof techniques for the BB84 protocol, which inherits the advantages arising from the simplicity of the protocol, such as accommodating the use of threshold detectors and simple off-line calibration methods for the light source. We show that the secure key rate of the DQPS protocol in the proof is eight thirds as high as the rate of the PE-BB84 protocol.Comment: Citation of the Fig.1 in the text correcte

Refined security proof of the round-robin differential phase shift quantum key distribution and its improved performance in the finite-sized case

Among many quantum key distribution (QKD) protocols, the round-robin differential phase shift (RRDPS) protocol is unique in that it can upper-bound the amount of the information leakage without monitoring the signal disturbance. To expedite implementation of the protocol, however, the number of pulses forming a single block should be kept small, which significantly decreases the key rates in the original security proof. In the present paper, we refine the security proof of the RRDPS protocol in the finite-sized regime and achieve a tighter estimation for the information leakage without changing the original experimental setups. As a consequence, we obtain better key rates in both asymptotic and finite-sized cases while keeping the preferable features of the protocol, such as omission of phase randomization.Comment: 25 pages, 5 figure

Complex Probability Measure and Aharonov's Weak Value

We present a complex probability measure relevant for double (pairs of) states in quantum mechanics, as an extension of the standard probability measure for single states that underlies Born's statistical rule. When the double states are treated as the initial and final states of a quantum process, we find that Aharonov's weak value, which has acquired a renewed interest as a novel observable quantity inherent in the process, arises as an expectation value associated with the probability measure. Despite being complex, our measure admits the physical interpretation as mixed processes, i.e., an ensemble of processes superposed with classical probabilities.Comment: 7 pages, 1 figure

Quantum key distribution protocols with slow basis choice

Many quantum key distribution (QKD) protocols require random choice of measurement basis for each pulse or each train of pulses. In some QKD protocols, such as the Round-Robin Differential Phase Shift (RRDPS) QKD protocol, this requirement is a bit challenging as randomly choosing hundreds of settings for every, say, 100 pulses may be too fast with current technologies. In this paper, we solve this issue by proving the security of QKD protocols with slow basis choice without compromising the secret key rate. We also show that the random choice of the bases for the state preparation can be made slow if the signals do not leak any information on the basis. Examples of QKD protocols that our technique can apply include the RRDPS protocol and BB84-type protocols, and our technique relaxes demands for the implementation of QKD systems.Comment: 7 pages, 4 figure

Universal Separability and Entanglement in Identical Particle Systems

Entanglement is known to be a relative notion, defined with respect to the choice of physical observables to be measured (i.e., the measurement setup used). This implies that, in general, the same state can be both separable and entangled for different measurement setups, but this does not exclude the existence of states which are separable (or entangled) for all possible setups. We show that for systems of bosonic particles there indeed exist such universally separable states: they are i.i.d. pure states. In contrast, there is no such state for fermionic systems with a few exceptional cases. We also find that none of the fermionic and bosonic systems admits universally entangled states.Comment: 11 pages, 1 figur

Rigorous calibration method for photon-number statistics

Characterization of photon statistics of a light source is one of the most basic tools in quantum optics. Although the outcome from existing methods is believed to be a good approximation when the measured light is sufficiently weak, there is no rigorous quantitative bounds on the degree of the approximation. As a result, they fail to fulfill the demand arising from emerging applications of quantum information such as quantum cryptography. Here, we propose a calibration method to produce rigorous bounds for a photon-number probability distribution by using a conventional Hanbury-Brown-Twiss setup with threshold photon detectors. We present a general framework to treat any number of detectors and non-uniformity of their efficiencies. The bounds are conveniently given as closed-form expressions of the observed coincidence rates and the detector efficiencies. We also show optimality of the bounds for light with a small mean photon number. As an application, we show that our calibration method can be used for the light source in a decoy-state quantum key distribution protocol. It replaces the a priori assumption on the distribution that has been commonly used, and achieves almost the same secure key rate when four detectors are used for the calibration.Comment: 8 pages, 3 figure

Experimental quantum key distribution without monitoring signal disturbance

Since the invention of Bennett-Brassard 1984 (BB84) protocol, many quantum key distribution (QKD) protocols have been proposed and some protocols are operated even in field environments. One of the striking features of QKD is that QKD protocols are provably secure unlike cryptography based on computational complexity assumptions. It has been believed that, to guarantee the security of QKD, Alice and Bob have to monitor the statistics of the measurement outcomes which are used to determine the amount of the privacy amplification to generate a key. Recently a new type of QKD protocol, called round robin differential phase shift (RRDPS) protocol, was proposed, and remarkably this protocol can generate a key without monitoring any statistics of the measurement outcomes. Here we report an experimental realization of the RRDPS protocol. We used a setup in which Bob randomly chooses one from four interferometers with different pulse delays so that he could implement phase difference measurements for all possible combinations with five-pulse time-bin states. Using the setup, we successfully distributed keys over 30 km of fiber, making this the first QKD experiment that does not rely on signal disturbance monitoring.Comment: 8 pages, 4 figure

Quantum key distribution with simply characterized light sources

To guarantee the security of quantum key distribution (QKD), several assumptions on light sources must be satisfied. For example, each random bit information is precisely encoded on an optical pulse and the photon-number probability distribution of the pulse is exactly known. Unfortunately, however, it is hard to check if all the assumptions are really met in practice, and it is preferable that we have minimal number of device assumptions. In this paper, we adopt the differential-phase-shift (DPS) QKD protocol and drastically mitigate the requirements on light sources. Specifically, we only assume the independence among emitted pulses, the independence of the vacuum emission probability from a chosen bit, and upper bounds on the tail distribution function of the total photon number in a single block of pulses for single, two and three photons. Remarkably, no other detailed characterizations, such as the amount of phase modulation, are required. Our security proof significantly relaxes demands for light sources, which paves a route to guarantee implementation security with simple verification of the devices.Comment: 10 pages, 2 figure