Do sex differences in paediatric type 1 diabetes care exist? A systematic review

Aims/hypothesis: Sex differences are present in cardiovascular care and in outcomes among adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus, which typically commences in childhood. Whether sex influences care and outcomes in childhood is not known. This systematic review provides an overview of sex differences in children with type 1 diabetes, focusing on patient and disease characteristics, treatment, comorbidities and complications. Methods: Literature in MEDLINE up to 15 June 2021 was searched, using the terms diabetes mellitus, sex characteristics, sex distribution, children and/or adolescents. All primary outcome studies on children with type 1 diabetes that mentioned a sex difference in outcome were included, with the exception of qualitative studies, case reports or case series. Studies not pertaining to the regular clinical care process and on incidence or prevalence only were excluded. Articles reporting sex differences were identified and assessed on quality and risk of bias using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Narrative synthesis and an adapted Harvest plot were used to summarise evidence by category. Results: A total of 8640 articles were identified, rendering 90 studies for review (n=643,217 individuals). Studies were of observational design and comprised cohort, cross-sectional and case–control studies. Most of the included studies showed a higher HbA1c in young female children both at diagnosis (seven studies, n=22,089) and during treatment (20 out of 21 studies, n=144,613), as well as a steeper HbA1c increase over time. Many studies observed a higher BMI (all ages, ten studies, n=89,700; adolescence, seven studies, n=33,153), a higher prevalence of being overweight or obese, and a higher prevalence of dyslipidaemia among the female sex. Hypoglycaemia and partial remission occurred more often in male participants, and ketoacidosis (at diagnosis, eight studies, n=3561) and hospitalisation was more often seen in female participants. Most of the findings showed that female participants used pump therapy more frequently (six studies, n=211,324) and needed higher insulin doses than male participants. Several comorbidities, such as thyroid disease and coeliac disease, appeared to be more common in female participants. All studies reported lower quality of life in female participants (15 studies, n=8722). Because the aim of this study was to identify sex differences, studies with neutral outcomes or minor differences may have been under-targeted. The observational designs of the included studies also limit conclusions on the causality between sex and clinical outcomes. Conclusions/interpretation: Sex disparities were observed throughout diabetes care in children with type 1 diabetes. Several outcomes appear worse in young female children, especially during adolescence. Focus on the cause and treatment of these differences may provide opportunities for better outcomes. Registration: This systematic review is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020213640) Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]

Effect of oxandrolone on glucose metabolism in growth hormone-treated girls with turner syndrome

Background: The weak androgen oxandrolone (Ox) may increase height but may also affect glucose metabolism in girls with Turner syndrome (TS). Methods: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, we assessed the effect of Ox at a dosage of either 0.06 or 0.03 mg/kg/day on glucose metabolism in 133 growth hormone (GH)-treated girls with TS. Patients were treated with GH (1.33 mg/m2/day) from baseline, combined with placebo (Pl) or Ox from the age of 8, and estrogens from the age of 12. Oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) were performed, and HbA1c levels were measured before, during, and after discontinuing Ox/Pl therapy. Results: Insulin sensitivity, assessed by the whole-body insulin sensitivity index (WBISI) decreased during GH+Ox/Pl (p = 0.003) without significant differences between the dosage groups. Values returned to pre-treatment levels after discontinuing GH+Ox/Pl. On GH+Ox, fasting glucose was less frequently impaired (Ox 0.03, p = 0.001; Ox 0.06, p = 0.02) and HbA1c levels decreased more (p = 0.03 and p = 0.001, respectively) than on GH+Pl. Conclusions: We conclude that in GH-treated girls with TS, Ox at a dosage of 0.03 or 0.06 mg/kg/day does not significantly affect insulin sensitivity. Insulin sensitivity decreases during GH therapy, to return to a pre-treatment level after discontinuing therapy

Bone mineral density assessed by phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry before and during long-term growth hormone treatment in girls with Turner's syndrome participating in a randomized dose-response study

To assess bone mineral density (BMD) in girls with Turner's syndrome before and during long-term treatment with GH, longitudinal measurements using phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry were performed in 68 girls with Turner's syndrome. These previously untreated girls, age 2-11 y, participating in a randomized, dose-response trial, were randomly assigned to one of three GH dosage groups: group A, 4 IU/m2/d (≈0.045 mg/kg/d); group B, first year 4 IU/m2/d, thereafter 6 IU/m2/d (≈0.0675 mg/kg/d); or group C, first year 4 IU/m2/d, second year 6 IU/m2/d, thereafter 8 IU/m2/d (≈0.090 mg/kg/d). In the first 4 y of GH treatment, no estrogens for pubertal induction were prescribed to the girls. Thereafter, girls started with 17β-estradiol (5 μg/kg body weight/d, orally) when they had reached the age of 12 y. BMD results were adjusted for bone age and sex, and expressed as SD scores using reference values of healthy Dutch girls. At baseline, almost every individual BMD value of bone consisting predominantly of cortical bone, as well as that of bone consisting predominantly of trabecular bone, was within the normal range of healthy girls and the SD scores were not significantly different from zero [mean (SE) 0.38 (0.22) and -0.04 (0.13)]. During 7 y of GH treatment, BMD SD scores showed a significant increase to values significantly higher than zero [mean (SE) 0.87 (0.15) and 0.95 (0.14)]. The increment in BMD SD score of bone consisting predominantly of cortical bone was significantly higher in group C compared with that of the other two GH dosage groups. The pretreatment bone age was significantly negatively related to the increment in BMD SD score. We found no significant influence of spontaneous puberty or the use of low-dose estrogens in the last 3 y of the study period on the increment in BMD SD score during 7 y of GH treatment. In conclusion, most untreated young girls with Turner's syndrome have a normal volumetric BMD. During 7 y of GH treatment with 4, 6, or 8 IU/m2/d, the BMD SD score increased significantly

A longitudinal study on bone mineral density until adulthood in girls with Turner's syndrome participating in a growth hormone injection frequency- response trial

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) in girls with Turner's syndrome (TS) before and during growth hormone (GH) treatment in combination with low dose oestrogens as well as three years after discontinuation of GH treatment. DESIGN: In a prospective, randomized injection frequency-response study, the effect of GH treatment in combination with low dose ethinyl oestradiol (starting with 0.05 μg/kg/day), on BMD was evaluated, comparing twice daily (BID) with once daily (OD) injections of a total GH dose of 6 IU/m2/day until adult height was reached. After discontinuation of GH treatment, the dosage of oestrogens was further increased to adult supplementation levels. PATIENTS: Nineteen untreated girls with TS, mean (SD) baseline pretreatment age 13.3 (1.7) (range 11.0-17.6) year. MEASUREMENTS: Before and during GH treatment, measurements of volumetric BMD were performed using phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry. In addition, the BMD measurements were repeated three years after discontinuation of GH treatment. BMD results were adjusted for bone age and sex, and expressed as SD-scores (SDS) using reference values of healthy Dutch girls. RESULTS: At baseline, most individual BMD values of cortical bone as well as those of trabecular bone were within the normal range of healthy girls. However, the mean BMD SDS of the trabecular bone was significantly lower than zero. During treatment, the BMD SDS showed a significant increment to values equal or higher than zero after mean (SD) GH treatment period of 36.6 (7.5) months. The increase in BMD of the cortical bone was significantly higher in the OD group than in the BID group. The BMD SDS in the last year of GH treatment was not significant different between the two injection frequency groups. Three years after discontinuation of GH treatment, the BMD values had increased further similar as in healthy girls, resulting in BMD values all within normal range or even higher. CONCLUSIONS: Most untreated girls with Turner syndrome, age ≥ 11 years, have a normal volumetric BMD of the cortical, as well as of the trabecular bone compared to healthy girls. During GH treatment with 6 IU/m2/day in combination with low dose oestrogens, the BMD SDS increases significantly. After discontinuation of GH treatment and the use of oestrogens in an adult dosage, the BMD was as high as in young healthy women

Osteoporosis in children and adolescents: how to treat and monitor?

Osteoporosis is a condition of increased bone fragility associated with fractures. Apart from primary genetic osteoporotic conditions, secondary osteoporosis in children is being increasingly recognized. As a result, there is growing interest in its prevention and treatment. Important goals of care are to prevent fractures, increase bone mass and trabecular and cortical thickness, reshape vertebral fractures, prevent (or correct) skeletal deformities, and improve mobility, independence, and quality of life. Secondary pediatric osteoporosis is often of multifactorial origin since affected children frequently have more than one acquired factor that is detrimental to bone health. Typical conditions causing osteoporosis are leukemias, progressive muscle or neurological disorders, as well as chronic inflammatory conditions and their treatment. Management of children with osteoporosis involves a multidisciplinary team involving pediatric experts from different subspecialties. With regard to prevention and early intervention, it is important to provide optimal management of any underlying systemic conditions including avoidance, or dose-reduction, of osteotoxic medications. Basic supporting life-style measures, such as appropriate nutrition, including adequate calcium intake and vitamin D, and physical activity are recommended, where possible. When pediatric treatment criteria for osteoporosis are met, antiresorptive drugs constitute the first pharmacological line treatment. Conclusion: This clinical review focuses on the prevention, treatment, and follow-up of children with, or at risk of developing, osteoporosis and the transition from pediatric to adult care. What is Known:• Osteoporosis and associated fractures can cause significant morbidity and reduce the quality of life.• The developing skeleton has huge potential for recovery and reshaping, thus early detection of fractures, assessment of recovery potential, and treatment of children with osteoporosis can prevent future fractures, deformities, and scoliosis, improve function and mobility, and reduce pain. What is New:• Osteoporosis in children and adolescents requires a multidisciplinary approach with a thorough assessment of recovery potential, and indication for therapy should be personalized.• Although bisphosphonates still represent the drug most commonly used to increase bone mass, improve mobility, and reduce pain and recurrence of fractures, new agents are being developed and could be beneficial in children with specific conditions

Osteoporosis in children and adolescents: how to treat and monitor?

Osteoporosis is a condition of increased bone fragility associated with fractures. Apart from primary genetic osteoporotic conditions, secondary osteoporosis in children is being increasingly recognized. As a result, there is growing interest in its prevention and treatment. Important goals of care are to prevent fractures, increase bone mass and trabecular and cortical thickness, reshape vertebral fractures, prevent (or correct) skeletal deformities, and improve mobility, independence, and quality of life. Secondary pediatric osteoporosis is often of multifactorial origin since affected children frequently have more than one acquired factor that is detrimental to bone health. Typical conditions causing osteoporosis are leukemias, progressive muscle or neurological disorders, as well as chronic inflammatory conditions and their treatment. Management of children with osteoporosis involves a multidisciplinary team involving pediatric experts from different subspecialties. With regard to prevention and early intervention, it is important to provide optimal management of any underlying systemic conditions including avoidance, or dose-reduction, of osteotoxic medications. Basic supporting life-style measures, such as appropriate nutrition, including adequate calcium intake and vitamin D, and physical activity are recommended, where possible. When pediatric treatment criteria for osteoporosis are met, antiresorptive drugs constitute the first pharmacological line treatment. Conclusion: This clinical review focuses on the prevention, treatment, and follow-up of children with, or at risk of developing, osteoporosis and the transition from pediatric to adult care. What is Known: • Osteoporosis and associated fractures can cause significant morbidity and reduce the quality of life. • The developing skeleton has huge potential for recovery and reshaping, thus early detection of fractures, assessment of recovery potential, and treatment of children with osteoporosis can prevent future fractures, deformities, and scoliosis, improve function and mobility, and reduce pain. What is New: • Osteoporosis in children and adolescents requires a multidisciplinary approach with a thorough assessment of recovery potential, and indication for therapy should be personalized. • Although bisphosphonates still represent the drug most commonly used to increase bone mass, improve mobility, and reduce pain and recurrence of fractures, new agents are being developed and could be beneficial in children with specific conditions

Osteoporosis in children and adolescents: when to suspect and how to diagnose it

Early recognition of osteoporosis in children and adolescents is important in order to establish an appropriate diagnosis of the underlying condition and to initiate treatment if necessary. In this review, we present the diagnostic work-up, and its pitfalls, of pediatric patients suspected of osteoporosis including a careful collection of the medical and personal history, a complete physical examination, biochemical data, molecular genetics, and imaging techniques. The most recent and relevant literature has been reviewed to offer a broad overview on the topic. Genetic and acquired pediatric bone disorders are relatively common and cause substantial morbidity. In recent years, there has been significant progress in the understanding of the genetic and molecular mechanistic basis of bone fragility and in the identification of acquired causes of osteoporosis in children. Specifically, drugs that can negatively impact bone health (e.g. steroids) and immobilization related to acute and chronic diseases (e.g. Duchenne muscular dystrophy) represent major risk factors for the development of secondary osteoporosis and therefore an indication to screen for bone mineral density and vertebral fractures. Long-term studies in children chronically treated with steroids have resulted in the development of systematic approaches to diagnose and manage pediatric osteoporosis. Conclusions: Osteoporosis in children requires consultation with and/or referral to a pediatric bone specialist. This is particularly relevant since children possess the unique ability for spontaneous and medication-assisted recovery, including reshaping of vertebral fractures. As such, pediatricians have an opportunity to improve bone mass accrual and musculoskeletal health in osteoporotic children.What is Known:• Both genetic and acquired pediatric disorders can compromise bone health and predispose to fractures early in life.• The identification of children at risk of osteoporosis is essential to make a timely diagnosis and start the treatment, if necessary.What is New:• Pediatricians have an opportunity to improve bone mass accrual and musculoskeletal health in osteoporotic children and children at risk of osteoporosis.• We offer an extensive but concise overview about the risk factors for osteoporosis and the diagnostic work-up (and its pitfalls) of pediatric patients suspected of osteoporosis

Potency of quality indicators in Dutch and international diabetes registries

Background: Diabetes mellitus forms a slow pandemic. Cardiovascular risk and quality of diabetes care are strongly associated. Quality indicators improve diabetes management and reduce mortality and costs. Various national diabetes registries render national quality indicators. We describe diabetes care indicators for Dutch children and adults with diabetes, and compare them with indicators established by registries worldwide. Methods: Indicator scores were derived from the Dutch Pediatric and Adult Registry of Diabetes Indicator sets of other national diabetes registries were collected and juxtaposed with global and continental initiatives for indicator sets. Results: This observational cohort study included 3738 patients representative of the Dutch diabetic outpatient population. The Dutch Pediatric and Adult Registry of Diabetes harbors ten quality indicators comprising treatment volumes, HbA1c control, foot examination, insulin pump therapy, and real-time continuous glucose monitoring. Worldwide, nine national registries record quality indicators, with great variety between registries. HbA1c control is recorded most frequently, and no indicator is reported among all registries. Conclusions: Wide variety among quality indicators recorded by national diabetes registries hinders international comparison and interpretation of quality of diabetes care. The potential of quality evaluation will be greatly enhanced when diabetes care indicators are aligned in an international standard set with variation across countries taken into consideration.</p

Potency of quality indicators in Dutch and international diabetes registries

Background: Diabetes mellitus forms a slow pandemic. Cardiovascular risk and quality of diabetes care are strongly associated. Quality indicators improve diabetes management and reduce mortality and costs. Various national diabetes registries render national quality indicators. We describe diabetes care indicators for Dutch children and adults with diabetes, and compare them with indicators established by registries worldwide. Methods: Indicator scores were derived from the Dutch Pediatric and Adult Registry of Diabetes Indicator sets of other national diabetes registries were collected and juxtaposed with global and continental initiatives for indicator sets. Results: This observational cohort study included 3738 patients representative of the Dutch diabetic outpatient population. The Dutch Pediatric and Adult Registry of Diabetes harbors ten quality indicators comprising treatment volumes, HbA1c control, foot examination, insulin pump therapy, and real-time continuous glucose monitoring. Worldwide, nine national registries record quality indicators, with great variety between registries. HbA1c control is recorded most frequently, and no indicator is reported among all registries. Conclusions: Wide variety among quality indicators recorded by national diabetes registries hinders international comparison and interpretation of quality of diabetes care. The potential of quality evaluation will be greatly enhanced when diabetes care indicators are aligned in an international standard set with variation across countries taken into consideration.</p