Quantitative Assessment of the Impact of Crohn\u27s Disease on Protein Abundance of Human Intestinal Drug-Metabolising Enzymes and Transporters

Crohn\u27s disease affects the mucosal layer of the intestine, predominantly ileum and colon segments, with the potential to affect the expression of intestinal enzymes and transporters, and consequently, oral drug bioavailability. We carried out a quantitative proteomic analysis of inflamed and non-inflamed ileum and colon tissues from Crohn\u27s disease patients and healthy donors. Homogenates from samples in each group were pooled and protein abundance determined by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS). In inflamed Crohn\u27s ileum, CYP3A4, CYP20A1, CYP51A1, ADH1B, ALPI, FOM1, SULT1A2, SULT1B1 and ABCB7 showed ≥10-fold reduction in abundance compared with healthy baseline. By contrast, only MGST1 showed ≥10 fold reduction in inflamed colon. Ileal UGT1A1, MGST1, MGST2, and MAOA levels increased by ≥2 fold in Crohn\u27s patients, while only ALPI showed ≥2 fold increase in the colon. Counter-intuitively, non-inflamed ileum had a higher magnitude of fold change than inflamed tissue when compared with healthy tissue. Marked but non-uniform alterations were observed in the expression of various enzymes and transporters in ileum and colon compared with healthy samples. Modelling will allow improved understanding of the variable effects of Crohn\u27s disease on bioavailability of orally administered drugs

Proteomic quantification of perturbation to pharmacokinetic target proteins in liver disease

Model-based assessment of drug pharmacokinetics in liver disease requires quantification of abundance and disease-related changes in hepatic enzymes and transporters. This study aimed to assess performance of three label-free methods [high N (HiN), intensity-based absolute quantification (iBAQ) and total protein approach (TPA)] against QconCAT-based targeted data in healthy and diseased (cancer and cirrhosis) liver tissue. Measurements were compared across methods and disease-to-control ratios provided a ‘disease perturbation factor’ (DPF) for each protein. Mean label-free measurements of targets correlated well (Pearson\u27s coefficient, r = 0.91–0.98 p \u3c 0.001) and with targeted data (r = 0.65–0.95, p \u3c 0.001). Concordance with targeted data was generally moderate (Lin\u27s concordance coefficient, ρc = 0.46–0.92), depending on methodology. Moderate precision and accuracy were observed for label-free methods (average fold error, AFE = 1.44–1.68; absolute average fold error, AAFE = 2.44–3.23). The DPF reconciled the data and indicated downregulated expression in cancer and cirrhosis, consistent with an inflammatory effect. HiN estimated perturbation consistently with targeted data (AFEHiN = 1.07, AAFEHiN = 1.57), whereas iBAQ overestimated (AFEiBAQ = 0.81, AAFEiBAQ = 1.67) and TPA underestimated (AFETPA = 1.37, AAFETPA = 1.65) disease effect. Progression from mild to severe cirrhosis was consistent with progressive decline in expression, reproduced by HiN but overestimated by iBAQ and underestimated by TPA (AFEHiN = 0.98, AFEiBAQ = 0.60, AFETPA = 1.24). DPF data confirmed non-uniform disease effect on drug-elimination pathways and progressive impact of disease severity

Physical and chemical screening of honey samples available in the Saudi market: An important aspect in the authentication process and quality assessment

Honey is becoming accepted as a reputable and effective therapeutic agent by practitioners of conventional medicine and by the general public. It has many biological activities and has been effectively used in the treatment of many diseases, e.g. gastrointestinal diseases, skin diseases, cancer, heart diseases, and neurological degeneration. Honey is an excellent source of energy containing mainly carbohydrates and water, as well as, small amounts of organic acids, vitamins, minerals, flavonoids, and enzymes. As a natural product with a relatively high price, honey has been for a long time a target for adulteration. The authenticity of honey is of great importance from commercial and health aspects. The study of the physical and chemical properties of honey has been increasingly applied as a certification process for the purpose of qualification of honey samples. The current work focusses on studying the authenticity of various types of honey sold in Riyadh market (24 samples). For this purpose, physical properties (pH, hydroxylmethylfurfural HMF, and pollen test) were measured. Besides, sugar composition was evaluated using Fehling test and an HPLC method. Elemental analysis was carried out using inductively coupled plasma (ICP). In addition, the presence of drug additives was assessed by means of GC–MS. The obtained results were compared with the Saudi Arabian standards, Codex Alimentarius Commission (2001), and harmonized methods of the international honey commission. Keywords: Honey, Adulteration, HPLC, GC–MS, ICP, Saudi marke

A family of QconCATs (Quantification conCATemers) for the quantification of human pharmacological target proteins

We have developed a family of QconCAT standards for the absolute quantification of pharmacological target proteins in a variety of human tissues. The QconCATs consist of concatenated proteotypic peptides, are designed in silico, and expressed in E. coli in media enriched with [13C6] arginine and [13C6] lysine to generate stable isotope-labeled multiplexed absolute quantification standards. The so-called MetCAT (used to quantify cytochrome P450 (CYP) and glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzymes), the liver TransCAT (used to quantify plasma-membrane drug transporters) and the brain TransCAT (used to quantify transporters expressed in the blood-brain barrier) were previously reported. We now report new QconCATs for the quantification of non-UGT non-CYP drug metabolizing enzymes (NuncCAT) and receptor tyrosine kinases (KinCAT). We have also redesigned the liver TransCAT, replacing problematic peptides and the N-terminal tag, for better characterization and expression. All these QconCATs showed high purity, high labelling efficiency with stable 13C isotope (\u3e95%), and high sequence coverage (\u3e88%). They represent a close-knit family of standards for quantifying pharmacokinetic targets, together with a more distant cousin, the KinCAT, used to quantify pharmacodynamic targets. Significance: Multiplexed determination of absolute protein abundances using quantitative conCATemers (QconCATs) has already been successfully demonstrated in different human tissues. We have previously reported two QconCATs; MetCAT and TransCAT, for the quantification of key enzymes (cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP) and glucuronosyltransferases (UGT)) and drug transporters. To build on these reports, application of the QconCAT methodology for the determination of non-UGT non-CYP enzymes and receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) in human tissue is reported here. This report focuses on development and characterization of two QconCAT constructs for the quantification of 24 enzymes and 21 RTKs. We demonstrate that the developed QconCATs have high purity, high incorporation efficiency and low peptide miscleavage upon proteolysis. Application of these QconCATs for reliable quantification of target proteins was achieved in human liver

Label-Free but Still Constrained: Assessment of Global Proteomic Strategies for the Quantification of Hepatic Enzymes and Transporters

Building and refining pharmacology models require “system” data derived from tissues and in vitro systems analyzed by quantitative proteomics. Label-free global proteomics offers a wide scope of analysis, allowing simultaneous quantification of thousands of proteins per sample. The data generated from such analysis offer comprehensive protein expression profiles that can address existing gaps in models. In this study, we assessed the performance of three widely used label-free proteomic methods, “high N” ion intensity approach (HiN), intensity-based absolute quantification (iBAQ) and total protein approach (TPA), in relation to the quantification of enzymes and transporters in 27 human liver microsomal samples. Global correlations between the three methods were highly significant (R2 \u3e 0.70, P \u3c 0.001, n 5 2232 proteins). Absolute abundances of 57 pharmacokinetic targets measured by standard-based label-free methods (HiN and iBAQ) showed good agreement, whereas the TPA overestimated abundances by two- to threefold. Relative abundance distribution of enzymes was similar for the three methods, while differences were observed with TPA in the case of transporters. Variability (CV) was similar across methods, with consistent between-sample relative quantification. The back-calculated amount of protein in the samples based on each method was compared with the nominal protein amount analyzed in the proteomic workflow, revealing overall agreement with data from the HiN method with bovine serum albumin as standard. The findings herein present a critique of label-free proteomic data relevant to pharmacokinetics and evaluate the possibility of retrospective analysis of historic datasets

Complementarity of two proteomic data analysis tools in the identification of drug-metabolising enzymes and transporters in human liver

Several software packages are available for the analysis of proteomic LC-MS/MS data, including commercial (e.g. Mascot/Progenesis LC-MS) and open access software (e.g. MaxQuant). In this study, Progenesis and MaxQuant were used to analyse the same data set from human liver microsomes (n = 23). Comparison focussed on the total number of peptides and proteins identified by the two packages. For the peptides exclusively identified by each software package, distribution of peptide length, hydrophobicity, molecular weight, isoelectric point and score were compared. Using standard cut-off peptide scores, we found an average of only 65% overlap in detected peptides, with surprisingly little consistency in the characteristics of peptides exclusively detected by each package. Generally, MaxQuant detected more peptides than Progenesis, and the additional peptides were longer and had relatively lower scores. Progenesis-specific peptides tended to be more hydrophilic and basic relative to peptides detected only by MaxQuant. At the protein level, we focussed on drug-metabolising enzymes (DMEs) and transporters, by comparing the number of unique peptides detected by the two packages for these specific proteins of interest, and their abundance. The abundance of DMEs and SLC transporters showed good correlation between the two software tools, but ABC showed less consistency. In conclusion, in order to maximise the use of MS datasets, we recommend processing with more than one software package. Together, Progenesis and MaxQuant provided excellent coverage, with a core of common peptides identified in a very robust way.</p