Ovarian tumor marker HE4 is differently expressed during the phases of the menstrual cycle in healthy young women

The objective of the present study was to investigate in healthy young women the fluctuations in serum concentration of human epididymal secretory protein human epididymis-specific protein 4 (HE4) and CA125 during the phases of the menstrual cycle and the correlation between HE4 and CA125 values and age. Forty women with regular menstrual cycles were included in the study. Pelvic and transvaginal ultrasound were performed in order to exclude ovarian pathologies. Blood samples were collected at follicular (FP), ovulatory (OP), and luteal (LP) phases of the hormonal cycle. The values of HE4 (expressed as picomoles per liter) observed were (mean +/- SEM) 39.1 +/- 1.1 (FP), 45.3 +/- 1.19 (OP), and 42.0 +/- 1.3 (LP). The difference between FP and OP was statistically significant (p = 0.0002). By contrast, serum CA125 levels (expressed as units per milliliter) were 14.35 +/- 0.66 (FP), 13.15 +/- 0.54 (OP), and 13.70 +/- 0.54 (LP), respectively. The levels of HE4 observed in serum samples of women below 35 years were 37.5 +/- 1.28 in the FP, 46.6 +/- 1.4 in the OP, and 42.8 +/- 1.49 in the LP. In this group, a statistically significant difference was observed in the FP compared with the OP (p < 0.0001), whereas no statistically significant difference was observed during the different hormonal phases in the group of women over 35. In conclusion, the correct interpretation of laboratory data is essential to define a threshold of normality, and for what concerns HE4 levels, the menstrual cycle phase-dependent variability appears indicated in the interpretation of the results

HE4 in the Differential Diagnosis of a Pelvic Mass: A Case Report

Neoplasms of the ovary present an increasing challenge to the physician. Neoplastic ovarian cysts can resemble endometriomas in ultrasound imaging and need to be carefully considered in the differential diagnosis. We report the case of a woman with a strong family history of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, who presented with a pelvic mass. The young girl refused oncogenetic counseling and genetic testing, even though she had a 50% a priori probability of being a BRCA1 mutation carrier. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a comparative analysis of the serum concentration of HE-4 and CA125 biomarkers provided accuracy and sensitivity in the diagnosis of a benign ovarian pathology. Based on this experience, we propose that the sensitivity of a screening program based on a HE4 and CA125 assay and MRI in high risk patients with mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes may be considered a useful pre-operative tool for the differential diagnosis of pelvic masses