12 research outputs found
An APRI+ALBI Based Multivariable Model as Preoperative Predictor for Posthepatectomy Liver Failure.
OBJECTIVE AND BACKGROUND
Clinically significant posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF B+C) remains the main cause of mortality after major hepatic resection. This study aimed to establish an APRI+ALBI, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio (APRI) combined with albumin-bilirubin grade (ALBI), based multivariable model (MVM) to predict PHLF and compare its performance to indocyanine green clearance (ICG-R15 or ICG-PDR) and albumin-ICG evaluation (ALICE).
METHODS
12,056 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database were used to generate a MVM to predict PHLF B+C. The model was determined using stepwise backwards elimination. Performance of the model was tested using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and validated in an international cohort of 2,525 patients. In 620 patients, the APRI+ALBI MVM, trained in the NSQIP cohort, was compared with MVM's based on other liver function tests (ICG clearance, ALICE) by comparing the areas under the curve (AUC).
RESULTS
A MVM including APRI+ALBI, age, sex, tumor type and extent of resection was found to predict PHLF B+C with an AUC of 0.77, with comparable performance in the validation cohort (AUC 0.74). In direct comparison with other MVM's based on more expensive and time-consuming liver function tests (ICG clearance, ALICE), the APRI+ALBI MVM demonstrated equal predictive potential for PHLF B+C. A smartphone application for calculation of the APRI+ALBI MVM was designed.
CONCLUSION
Risk assessment via the APRI+ALBI MVM for PHLF B+C increases preoperative predictive accuracy and represents an universally available and cost-effective risk assessment prior to hepatectomy, facilitated by a freely available smartphone app
Von Willebrand Factor Antigen Facilitates Long-Term Risk Stratification in Patients Undergoing Liver Resection
Current evidence on posthepatectomy liver failure: comprehensive review
Introduction: Despite important advances in many areas of hepatobiliary surgical practice during the past decades, posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) still represents an important clinical challenge for the hepatobiliary surgeon. The aim of this review is to present the current body of evidence regarding different aspects of PHLF. Methods: A literature review was conducted to identify relevant articles for each topic of PHLF covered in this review. The literature search was performed using Medical Subject Heading terms on PubMed for articles on PHLF in English until May 2022. Results: Uniform reporting on PHLF is lacking due to the use of various definitions in the literature. There is no consensus on optimal preoperative assessment before major hepatectomy to avoid PHLF, although many try to estimate future liver remnant function. Once PHLF occurs, there is still no effective treatment, except liver transplantation, where the reported experience is limited. Discussion: Strict adherence to one definition is advised when reporting data on PHLF. The use of the International Study Group of Liver Surgery criteria of PHLF is recommended. There is still no widespread established method for future liver remnant function assessment. Liver transplantation is currently the only effective way to treat severe, intractable PHLF, but for many indications, this treatment is not available in most countries
Elucidating the Importance of Osteopontin during Postoperative Liver Regeneration in Humans
Current evidence on posthepatectomy liver failure: comprehensive review
Introduction: Despite important advances in many areas of hepatobiliary surgical practice during the past decades, posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) still represents an important clinical challenge for the hepatobiliary surgeon. The aim of this review is to present the current body of evidence regarding different aspects of PHLF. Methods: A literature review was conducted to identify relevant articles for each topic of PHLF covered in this review. The literature search was performed using Medical Subject Heading terms on PubMed for articles on PHLF in English until May 2022. Results: Uniform reporting on PHLF is lacking due to the use of various definitions in the literature. There is no consensus on optimal preoperative assessment before major hepatectomy to avoid PHLF, although many try to estimate future liver remnant function. Once PHLF occurs, there is still no effective treatment, except liver transplantation, where the reported experience is limited. Discussion: Strict adherence to one definition is advised when reporting data on PHLF. The use of the International Study Group of Liver Surgery criteria of PHLF is recommended. There is still no widespread established method for future liver remnant function assessment. Liver transplantation is currently the only effective way to treat severe, intractable PHLF, but for many indications, this treatment is not available in most countries
The Ratio of Activin A and Follistatin-Like 3 Is Associated With Posthepatectomy Liver Failure and Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Liver Resection
Background and Aims: Activin A is a key regulator in liver regeneration, but data evaluating its role in humans after hepatic surgery are limited. In this study we explore the predictive role of circulating activin A, its antagonist follistatin-like 3 (FSTL-3), and their ratio for posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) and monitor their levels after surgery, to evaluate their role in human liver regeneration. Methods: Activin A and FSTL-3 levels were assessed in 59 patients undergoing liver surgery. Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, we evaluated the predictive potential of activin A, FSTL-3, and their ratio. Results: While perioperative dynamics of activin A and FSTL3 were significantly affected by hepatic resection (activin A PÂ = .045, FSTL-3 PÂ = .005), their functionally relevant ratio did not significantly change (PÂ = .528). Neither activin A nor FSTL-3 alone but only their ratio exhibited a significant predictive potential for PHLF (area under the curve: 0.789, PÂ = .038). Patients with low preoperative activin A/FSTL-3 ratio were found to more frequently suffer from PHLF (0.017) and morbidity (0.005). Conclusion: Activin A/FSTL-3 ratio predicts PHLF and morbidity. Its significance in preoperative patient assessment needs to be further validated in larger, independent cohorts
Glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucagon-like peptide-2 regulation during human liver regeneration
Abstract Accumulating evidence suggests that metabolic demands of the regenerating liver are met via lipid metabolism and critical regulators of this process. As such, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) critically affect hepatic regeneration in rodent models. The present study aimed to evaluate potential alterations and dynamics of circulating GLP-1 and GLP-2 in patients undergoing liver resections, focusing on post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). GLP-1, GLP-2, Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and parameters of lipid metabolism were determined perioperatively in fasting plasma of 46 patients, who underwent liver resection. GLP-1 and GLP-2 demonstrated a rapid and consistently inverse time course during hepatic regeneration with a significant decrease of GLP-1 and increase of GLP-2 on POD1. Importantly, these postoperative dynamics were significantly more pronounced when PHLF occurred. Of note, the extent of resection or development of complications were not associated with these alterations. IL-6 mirrored the time course of GLP-2. Assessing the main degradation protein dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) no significant association with either GLP-1 or -2 could be found. Additionally, in PHLF distinct postoperative declines in plasma lipid parameters were present and correlated with GLP-2 dynamics. Our data suggest dynamic inverse regulation of GLP-1 and GLP-2 during liver regeneration, rather caused by an increase in expression/release than by changes in degradation capacity and might be associated with inflammatory responses. Their close association with circulating markers of lipid metabolism and insufficient hepatic regeneration after liver surgery suggest a critical involvement during these processes in humans
Perioperative Chemotherapy Including Bevacizumab in Potentially Curable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Long-Term Follow-Up of the ASSO-LM1 Trial
In 2007, the ASSO-LM1 trial, a multicenter prospective study, was initiated to investigate the resectability (R0) rate following preoperative combination therapy with XELOX and bevacizumab in patients with potentially resectable colorectal liver metastases. Six cycles of systemic therapy were administered preoperatively, although the sixth cycle did not include bevacizumab, resulting in 5 weeks between the last bevacizumab dose and surgery. Treatment with bevacizumab plus XELOX was restarted for another six cycles postoperatively. In total, 43 patients were enrolled in the ASSO-LM1 trial. Eight patients were ineligible for resection due to protocol violation and progression in two patients. The resectability of operated patients was 97% with 34 R0 resections and one R1 resection. Postoperative morbidity occurred in 22% of patients, of which three operative revisions were related to the primary tumor resection. Efficacy results for response in 38 eligible patients confirmed an ORR of 66%, 31% SD and 3% PD according to RECIST. Preoperative grade 3/4 adverse events were 17% diarrhea, 5% HFS and 5% thromboembolic events. Overall survival significantly differed depending upon the fulfillment of adjuvant treatment in curative resected patients (59.1 mo vs. 30.8 mo). In conclusion, the ASSO-LM1 trial is a hypothesis-generating study confirming the prognostic benefits of perioperative therapy with XELOX and bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer confined to the liver
Age Related Differences in Monocyte Subsets and Cytokine Pattern during Acute COVID-19—A Prospective Observational Longitudinal Study
The COVID-19 pandemic drastically highlighted the vulnerability of the elderly population towards viral and other infectious threats, illustrating that aging is accompanied by dysregulated immune responses currently summarized in terms like inflammaging and immunoparalysis. To gain a better understanding on the underlying mechanisms of the age-associated risk of adverse outcome in individuals experiencing a SARS-CoV-2 infection, we analyzed the impact of age on circulating monocyte phenotypes, activation markers and inflammatory cytokines including interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in the context of COVID-19 disease progression and outcome in 110 patients. Our data indicate no age-associated differences in peripheral monocyte counts or subset composition. However, age and outcome are associated with differences in monocyte activation status. Moreover, a distinct cytokine pattern of IL-6, IL-8 and TNF in elderly survivors versus non-survivors, which consolidates over the time of hospitalization, suggests that older patients with adverse outcomes experience an inappropriate immune response, reminiscent of an inflammaging driven immunoparalysis. Our study underscores the value, necessity and importance of longitudinal monitoring in elderly COVID-19 patients, as dynamic changes after symptom onset can be observed, which allow for a differentiated insight into confounding factors that impact the complex pathogenesis following an infection with SARS-CoV-2
Transcriptomic landscapes of effective and failed liver regeneration in humans
Background & Aims: Although extensive experimental evidence on the process of liver regeneration exists, in humans, validation is largely missing. However, liver regeneration is critically affected by underlying liver disease. Within this project, we aimed to systematically assess early transcriptional changes during liver regeneration in humans and further assess how these processes differ in people with dysfunctional liver regeneration. Methods: Blood samples of 154 patients and intraoperative tissue samples of 46 patients undergoing liver resection were collected and classified with regard to dysfunctional postoperative liver regeneration. Of those, a matched cohort of 21 patients were used for RNA sequencing. Samples were assessed for circulating cytokines, gene expression dynamics, intrahepatic neutrophil accumulation, and spatial transcriptomics. Results: Individuals with dysfunctional liver regeneration demonstrated an aggravated transcriptional inflammatory response with higher intracellular adhesion molecule-1 induction. Increased induction of this critical leukocyte adhesion molecule was associated with increased intrahepatic neutrophil accumulation and activation upon induction of liver regeneration in individuals with dysfunctional liver regeneration. Comparing baseline gene expression profiles in individuals with and without dysfunctional liver regeneration, we found that dual-specificity phosphatase 4 (DUSP4) expression, a known critical regulator of intracellular adhesion molecule-1 expression in endothelial cells, was markedly reduced in patients with dysfunctional liver regeneration. Mimicking clinical risk factors for dysfunctional liver regeneration, we found liver sinusoidal endothelial cells of two liver disease models to have significantly reduced baseline levels of DUSP4. Conclusions: Exploring the landscape of early transcriptional changes of human liver regeneration, we observed that people with dysfunctional regeneration experience overwhelming intrahepatic inflammation. Subclinical liver disease might account for DUSP4 reduction in liver sinusoidal endothelial cells, which ultimately primes the liver for an aggravated inflammatory response. Impact and implications: Using a unique human biorepository, focused on liver regeneration (LR), we explored the landscape of circulating and tissue-level alterations associated with both functional and dysfunctional LR. In contrast to experimental animal models, people with dysfunctional LR demonstrated an aggravated transcriptional inflammatory response, higher intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) induction, intrahepatic neutrophil accumulation and activation upon induction of LR. Although inflammatory responses appear rapidly after liver resection, people with dysfunctional LR have exaggerated inflammatory responses that appear to be related to decreased levels of LSEC DUSP4, challenging existing concepts of post-resectional LR