Abnormal Fetal Growth:Small for Gestational Age, Fetal Growth Restriction, Large for Gestational Age: Definitions and Epidemiology

Abnormal fetal growth (growth restriction and overgrowth) is associated with perinatal morbidity, mortality, and lifelong risks to health. To describe abnormal growth, "small for gestational age" and "large for gestational age" are commonly used terms. However, both are statistical definitions of fetal size below or above a certain threshold related to a reference population, rather than referring to an abnormal condition. Fetuses can be constitutionally small or large and thus healthy, whereas fetuses with seemingly normal size can be growth restricted or overgrown. Although golden standards to detect abnormal growth are lacking, understanding of both pathologic conditions has improved significantly.</p

Evaluation and Management of Suspected Fetal Growth Restriction

Impaired fetal growth owing to placental insufficiency is a major contributor to adverse perinatal outcomes. No intervention is available that improves outcomes by changing the pathophysiologic process. Monitoring in early-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) focuses on optimizing the timing of iatrogenic preterm delivery using cardiotocography and Doppler ultrasound. In late-onset FGR, identifying the fetus at risk for immediate hypoxia and who benefits from expedited delivery is challenging. It is likely that studies in the next decade will provide evidence how to best integrate different monitoring variables and other prognosticators in risk models that are aimed to optimize individual treatment strategies

A consensus-based core feature set for surgical complexity at laparoscopic hysterectomy

BACKGROUND: There are no current standardized and accepted methods to characterize the surgical complexity of a laparoscopic hysterectomy. This leads to challenges when trying to understand the relationship between the patient and the surgical features and outcomes. The development of core feature sets for laparoscopic hysterectomy studies would enable future trials to measure the similar meaningful variables that can contribute to surgical complexity and outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a core feature set for the surgical complexity of a laparoscopic hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: This was an international Delphi consensus study. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify the features that were reported in studies on laparoscopic hysterectomy complexity. All the features were presented for evaluation and prioritization to key experts in 3 rounds of online surveys. A priori consensus criteria were used to reach agreement on the final outcomes for inclusion in the core feature set. RESULTS: Experts represented North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Asia, and Oceania. Most of them had fellowship training in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. Sixty-four potential features were entered into round 1. Experts reached a consensus on 7 features to be included in the core feature set. These features were grouped under the following domains: 1) patient features, 2) uterine features, and 3) nonuterine pelvic features. The patient features include obesity and other nonobesity comorbidities that alter or limit the ability of a surgeon to perform the basic or routine steps in a laparoscopic hysterectomy. The uterine features include the size and presence of fibroids. The nonuterine pelvic features include endometriosis, ovarian cysts, and adhesions (bladder-to-uterus, rectouterine pouch, and other adhesions). CONCLUSION: Using robust consensus science methods, an international consortium of experts has developed a core feature set that should be assessed and reported in all future studies that aim to assess the relationship between the patient features and surgical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy