Attentional Prioritization of Infant Faces Is Limited to Own-Race Infants

Background: Recent evidence indicates that infant faces capture attention automatically, presumably to elicit caregiving behavior from adults and leading to greater probability of progeny survival. Elsewhere, evidence demonstrates that people show deficiencies in the processing of other-race relative to own-race faces. We ask whether this other-race effect impacts on attentional attraction to infant faces. Using a dot-probe task to reveal the spatial allocation of attention, we investigate whether other-race infants capture attention. Principal Findings: South Asian and White participants (young adults aged 18–23 years) responded to a probe shape appearing in a location previously occupied by either an infant face or an adult face; across trials, the race (South Asian/ White) of the faces was manipulated. Results indicated that participants were faster to respond to probes that appeared in the same location as infant faces than adult faces, but only on own-race trials. Conclusions/Significance: Own-race infant faces attract attention, but other-race infant faces do not. Sensitivity to facespecific care-seeking cues in other-race kindenschema may be constrained by interracial contact and experience

Plasticity of face processing in infancy

Experience plays a crucial role for the normal development of many perceptual and cognitive functions, such as speech perception. For example, between 6 and 10 months of age, the infant's ability to discriminate among native speech sounds improves, whereas the ability to discriminate among foreign speech sounds declines. However, a recent investigation suggests that some experience with nonnative languages from 9 months of age facilitates the maintenance of this ability at 12 months. Nelson has suggested that the systems underlying face processing may be similarly sculpted by experience with different kinds of faces. In the current investigation, we demonstrate that, in human infants between 6 and 9 months of age, exposure to nonnative faces, in this case, faces of Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus), facilitates the discrimination of monkey faces, an ability that is otherwise lost around 9 months of age. These data support, and further elucidate, the role of early experience in the development of face processing

Recognition of monkey faces by monkey experts

International audienceHuman beings automatically discriminate human faces at the individual level. Infants aged 3 months implicitly recognise monkey faces, but this capacity disappears as recognition skills mature. Expertise is known to affect recognition capacities for different categories of stimuli that are not even face-like in their configuration. We have explored the capacity of adult experts and nonexperts in primatology to recognise monkey faces in both explicit and implicit recognition tasks. In the explicit task, where subjects received the instruction to recognise a face seen previously, experts proved to be more accurate than non-experts. Experts were more affected by inversion than non-experts, suggesting that the processing of those faces is based on their configuration, as is generally observed for human faces. This replicates findings from Diamond and Carey (J Exp Psychol Gen 115:107-117, 1986) in dog experts. In the implicit recognition task, assessed by a visual paired comparison task where no instruction of recognition was given, automatic discrimination was observed for human faces but not for monkey faces. These results suggest that experience acquired by the time of adulthood did not lead the experts to develop recognition skills to the point of matching those exhibited for human faces