140 Impact of TAVI with the Edwards-SAPIEN endoprosthesis on mitral regurgitation: results of a serial echocardiography assessment

PurposeThe impact of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) on mitral regurgitation (MR) is controversial. Two recent publications have reported improvement in MR grades following implantation of the Edwards-SAPIEN endoprosthesis. These findings were not replicated with the Core-Valve. The time course of improvement in MR grades with the Edwards-SAPIEN valve has not been described on an individual patient basis and the potential mechanisms of benefit are unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the acute and intermediate changes in MR severity after TAVI with the Edwards-SAPIEN endoprosthesis.MethodsEchocardiography was performed in 22 consecutive patients before and after treatment, and at 1 month follow-up. MR was assessed by color flow mapping and was graded as none, mild, moderate, or severe. MR was defined as organic or functional.ResultsThe aortic valve area increased from pretreatment 0.72cm2 to post-treatment 1.87cm2 and postdischarge 1.81cm2 (P<0.0001). Before intervention MR was present in 73% of the patients. It was mild, moderate, or severe in 36% (n=8), 32% (n=7), and 4% (n=1) respectively. MR was defined as organic in 6 patients (27%) and functional in 10 patients (45%). Compared to baseline, MR grades improved by 1 month (p for trend=0.01). This benefit was secondary to a reduction in regurgitation grades in 50% of patients with an MR at baseline (n=6), while no worsening was observed in the other patients with an MR (n=6) and no occurrence of MR was observed in patients without MR (n=6). A trend for a greater improvement in MR grade was observed in patients with functional MR (n=7, − 1.00) compared to those with an organic MR (n=5, − 0.294; p=0.10).ConclusionIn consecutive patients with a successful implantation of an Edwards-SAPIEN valve a significant improvement in MR was observed. This benefit was secondary to an improvement in 50% of patients with an MR and no worsening in the others

Silent ischemic brain lesions after transcatheter aortic valve replacement : lesion distribution and predictors

Silent ischemic brain lesions and ischemic stroke are known complications of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We aimed to investigate the occurrence and distribution of TAVR-related silent ischemic brain lesions using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI). Consecutive patients with severe aortic valve stenosis treated with TAVR underwent cerebral DWI within 5 days after the index procedure. DWI scans were analyzed for the occurrence and distribution of new ischemic lesions post-TAVR. Forty-two patients were enrolled in this study. After TAVR, a total of 276 new cerebral ischemic lesions were detected in 38 (90 %) patients, with a median of 4.5 (interquartile range 2.0-7.0) lesions per patient. A total of 129 (47 %) lesions were detected in the cortical regions, 97 (35 %) in the subcortical regions, and 50 (18 %) in the cerebellum or brainstem. The median lesion volume was 20.2 A mu l (10.0, 42.7) and the total ischemic lesion volume was 132.3 A mu l (42.8, 336.9). The new ischemic brain lesions were clinically silent in 37 (97 %) patients; the other patient had a transient ischemic attack. Age (B = 0.528, p = 0.015), hyperlipidaemia (B = 5.809, p = 0.028) and post-dilatation of the implanted prosthesis (B = 7.196, p = 0.029) were independently associated with the number of post-TAVR cerebral DWI lesions. In addition, peak transaortic gradient was independently associated with post-procedural total infarct volume. Clinically silent cerebral infarcts occurred in 90 % of patients following TAVR, most of which were small (<20 mu l) and located in the cortical regions of the cerebral hemispheres. An independent association was found between age, hyperlipidaemia and balloon post-dilatation and the number of post-TAVR ischemic brain lesions. Only peak transaortic gradient was independently associated with post-procedural total infarct volume

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention by drug-eluting balloon angioplasty : The nonrandomized fourth arm of the DEB-AMI (drug-eluting balloon in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) trial

ObjectiveTo evaluate a paclitaxel drug-eluting balloon (DEB) only strategy in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), aiming at a comparison with bare metal stent (BMS) alone, DEB followed by BMS, and paclitaxel eluting stent (PES), as assessed in the randomized Drug Eluting Balloon in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (DEB-AMI) trial. BackgroundDEB-only seems an attractive strategy in PPCI, as it obviates the risk of stent thrombosis. MethodsThis study is a prospective registry with the same inclusion/exclusion criteria used in the DEB-AMI trial, as it constitutes the fourth, nonrandomized, treatment arm of this trial. Patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction were allocated to DEB-only (DIOR II, Eurocor GmbH, Bonn, Germany) after successful thrombus aspiration and predilatation. Primary endpoint was 6-month angiographic in-balloon/stent late-luminal loss (LLL). Secondary endpoints were in-balloon/stent binary restenosis and major adverse cardiac events (MACE: death, myocardial infarction, target-vessel revascularization). ResultsForty patients underwent PPCI by DEB-only. Procedural success was achieved in 97.5% with bail-out stenting required in 10.0% of procedures. In DEB-only, LLL was 0.510.59 mm as compared to 0.74 +/- 0.57 mm in BMS (P=0.44), 0.64 +/- 0.56 mm in DEB+BMS (P=0.88) and 0.21 +/- 0.32 mm in PES (P ConclusionsPPCI by DEB-only in selected patients yielded an angiographic outcome comparable to BMS alone and DEB followed by BMS. PES proved angiographic superiority to DEB-only. DEB-only is therefore a potential treatment alternative during PPCI in patients with contra-indications to drug-eluting stents. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention by drug-eluting balloon angioplasty : The nonrandomized fourth arm of the DEB-AMI (drug-eluting balloon in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) trial

ObjectiveTo evaluate a paclitaxel drug-eluting balloon (DEB) only strategy in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), aiming at a comparison with bare metal stent (BMS) alone, DEB followed by BMS, and paclitaxel eluting stent (PES), as assessed in the randomized Drug Eluting Balloon in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (DEB-AMI) trial. BackgroundDEB-only seems an attractive strategy in PPCI, as it obviates the risk of stent thrombosis. MethodsThis study is a prospective registry with the same inclusion/exclusion criteria used in the DEB-AMI trial, as it constitutes the fourth, nonrandomized, treatment arm of this trial. Patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction were allocated to DEB-only (DIOR II, Eurocor GmbH, Bonn, Germany) after successful thrombus aspiration and predilatation. Primary endpoint was 6-month angiographic in-balloon/stent late-luminal loss (LLL). Secondary endpoints were in-balloon/stent binary restenosis and major adverse cardiac events (MACE: death, myocardial infarction, target-vessel revascularization). ResultsForty patients underwent PPCI by DEB-only. Procedural success was achieved in 97.5% with bail-out stenting required in 10.0% of procedures. In DEB-only, LLL was 0.510.59 mm as compared to 0.74 +/- 0.57 mm in BMS (P=0.44), 0.64 +/- 0.56 mm in DEB+BMS (P=0.88) and 0.21 +/- 0.32 mm in PES (P ConclusionsPPCI by DEB-only in selected patients yielded an angiographic outcome comparable to BMS alone and DEB followed by BMS. PES proved angiographic superiority to DEB-only. DEB-only is therefore a potential treatment alternative during PPCI in patients with contra-indications to drug-eluting stents. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc

Same wrist intervention via the cubital (ulnar) artery in case of radial puncture failure for percutaneous cardiac catheterization or intervention: The multicenter SWITCH registry

Aims: The radial approach is safer than the femoral for percutaneous coronary procedures. However its feasibility is lower, mainly for technical issues, often related to failure to puncture or cannulate the radial artery. The ulnar approach is a valid alternative to radial. We aimed to test the incidence, feasibility and safety of a direct homolateral ulnar approach in case of failed radial sheath insertion. Methods and results: Five operators collected their 1-year activity (diagnostic and interventional) with focus on entry site. Entry site choice was left to operators' discretion. In case of failed radial sheath insertion, an attempt to cannulate the homolateral ulnar artery was mandated, if ulnar pulse was present. All patients in whom this attempt was performed were followed until discharge. Out of 2403 procedures (1271 interventions), the final successful entry site was radial in 66.5%, femoral in 31.0%, ulnar in 2.1% and brachial in 0.4%. Radial failure occurred in 117 patients (6.9%). In 75 patients, the radial failure was not due to sheath insertion (which was successful), but to lack of catheter support or to tortuosity of the sub-clavian/brachial arteries. In the remaining 42 (35.9% of all radial failures), a homolateral ulnar approach was attempted. A successful cannulation of the ulnar artery occurred in 36 patients (85.7%) with further performance of the complete procedure. Concerning local complications, 1 radial pseudo-aneurysm (treated with additional compression) occurred, while no cases of early hand ischemia were reported. Conclusions: In this multicenter registry, in case of failed radial sheath insertion, switching directly to the homolateral ulnar artery for percutaneous coronary procedures is feasible and it appears to be safe, without cases of symptomatic hand ischemia. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved