Awareness of Radiation Protection and Common Radiation Dose Levels Among Healthcare Workers

Introduction: Access to ionizing radiation has become widely available for diagnosis and treatment. The increased use of ionizing radiation has been associated with radiation exposure hazards for patients and radiation workers. Raising the level of radiation protection awareness is important to maintain the safety of healthcare settings. Methods: Online questionnaires were distributed to 755 healthcare workers and students at King Abdulaziz Medical City and King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire consisted of 14 multiple-choice questions divided into two sections (questions related to radiation protection and common radiologic examination doses). Results: In total, 443 participants completed the questionnaire, including 142 (32%) medical students, 107 (24%) radiology technologists, 105 (24%) radiography students, and 89 (20%) physicians. Of the participants, 245 (55%) were men. A total of 74 (84%) physicians and 51 (47%) radiology technologists had more than 5 years of experience. Eleven (12%) physicians and 44 (41%) radiology technologists had 1–4 years of experience, whereas the rest had less than 1 year of experience. Only 16% of participants attended training courses on a regular basis. However, 15% of the participants thought that they had excellent knowledge of radiation protection, whereas 18% admitted that they did not have sufficient knowledge. Sixty-two percent of the questions related to radiation protection awareness were answered correctly. Forty-five percent of the participants correctly answered questions related to doses from common radiologic examinations. Only 23% and 16% of participants were aware of the noncontrast chest CT and lumbar x-ray doses, respectively. Moreover, 35% and 24% of participants did not know that pelvic MRI and abdominal ultrasound do not contribute any radiation dose, respectively. Conclusion: The results showed a knowledge gap regarding radiation protection and dose levels; therefore, periodic refresher courses are recommended for healthcare workers in order to increase the level of awareness

Advancing photocatalysis: Innovative approaches using novel V2O5/ZnO nanocomposites for efficient photocatalytic degradation of tubantin red

Photocatalytic response of V2O5, ZnO, and V2O5/ZnO nanostructures for the degradation of Tubantin red 8BL dye has been reported. Pure V2O5, ZnO, and V2O5/ZnO composite nanostructures were synthesized through a hydrothermal method. UV–Visible spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray microscopy (EDX), and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) characterizations were done to examine their bandgap energy (Eg), morphology, composition, and structure, respectively. These discoveries advance our knowledge of the agglomerated nanoparticles of V2O5, ZnO, and V2O5/ZnO for their prospective photocatalytic uses. The presence of V2O5 and ZnO in composite is confirmed through the analysis of FTIR. Flower shaped morphology was observed in V2O5/ZnO nanocomposite by SEM. The 2.83 eV bandgap energy was observed in composite. The nanocomposite was evaluated for Tubantin red 8BL photodegradation. The efficiencies of pure ZnO nanoparticles after 25 min, 50 min, 75 min, 100 min, 125 min, and 150 min irradiation are 54.54 %, 58.00 %, 61.41 %, 63.84 %, 71.19 %, and 78.53 %; for pure V2O5 nanoparticles, they are 72.72 %, 76.45 %, 80.85 %, 85.42 %, 89.99 %, and 94.32 %. Similarly, the efficiencies (%) of V2O5/ZnO composite nanoparticles are 45.10 %, 53.27 %, 60.75 %, 68.24 %, 79.99 %, 91.74 %, and 99.79 %, respectively. Reusability studies (three cycles) were used to further confirm the photocatalytic efficiency, and the findings of the subsequent characterization revealed an arrangement of crystalline layers which is the cause of the high efficiency. These nanostructures also demonstrated stability across three cycles, suggesting more photocatalytic uses for them in the future