Randomized comparison of awake nonresectional versus nonawake resectional lung volume reduction surgery

ObjectiveThe study objective was to assess in a randomized controlled study (NCT00566839) the comparative results of awake nonresectional or nonawake resectional lung volume reduction surgery.MethodSixty-three patients were randomly assigned by computer to receive unilateral video-assisted thoracic surgery lung volume reduction surgery by a nonresectional technique performed through epidural anesthesia in 32 awake patients (awake group) or the standard resectional technique performed through general anesthesia in 31 patients (control group). Primary outcomes were hospital stay and changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second. During follow-up, the need of contralateral treatment because of loss of postoperative benefit was considered a failure event as death.ResultsIntergroup comparisons (awake vs control) showed no difference in gender, age, and body mass index. Hospital stay was shorter in the awake group (6 vs 7.5 days, P = .04) with 21 versus 10 patients discharged within 6 days (P = .01). At 6 months, forced expiratory volume in 1 second improved significantly in both study groups (0.28 vs 0.29 L) with no intergroup difference (P = .79). In both groups, forced expiratory volume in 1 second improvements lasted more than 24 months. At 36 months, freedom from contralateral treatment was 55% versus 50% (P = .5) and survival was 81% versus 87% (P = .5).ConclusionsIn this randomized study, awake nonresectional lung volume reduction surgery resulted in significantly shorter hospital stay than the nonawake procedure. There were no differences between study groups in physiologic improvements, freedom from contralateral treatment, and survival. We speculate that compared with the nonawake procedure, awake lung volume reduction surgery can offer similar clinical benefit but a faster postoperative recovery

Evidence gaps on weight gain in people living with HIV: a scoping review to define a research agenda

Background: Combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) dramatically improved survival in people living with HIV (PLWH) but is associated with weight gain (WG), raising concern for a possible obesity epidemic in PLWH. This scoping review aims to identify the gaps in the existing evidence on WG in PLWH and generate a future research agenda. Methods: This review was conducted according to the methodology for scoping studies and reported according to the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Review checklist. Articles published in English in the last 10 years indexed in Pubmed, WHO Global Index Medicus, or Embase were searched using specific queries focused on WG in PLWH. Results: Following the selection process, 175 included articles were reviewed to search for the available evidence on four specific topics: (I) definition of WG in PLWH, (II) pathogenesis of WG in PLWH, (III) impact of ART on WG, (IV) correlation of WG with clinical outcomes. A summary of the data enabled us to identify gaps and clearly define the following research agenda: (I) develop a data-driven definition of WG in PLWH and define noninvasive assessment methods for body weight and fat composition; (II) further investigate the interaction between HIV/cART and immunity, metabolism, and adipose tissue; (III) establish the specific role of individual drugs on WG; (IV) clarify the independent role of WG, cART, HIV, and metabolic factors on clinical events. Conclusions: The proposed research agenda may help define future research and fill the knowledge gaps that have emerged from this review

The role of immune suppression in COVID-19 hospitalization: clinical and epidemiological trends over three years of SARS-CoV-2 epidemic

Specific immune suppression types have been associated with a greater risk of severe COVID-19 disease and death. We analyzed data from patients >17 years that were hospitalized for COVID-19 at the “Fondazione IRCCS Ca′ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico” in Milan (Lombardy, Northern Italy). The study included 1727 SARS-CoV-2-positive patients (1,131 males, median age of 65 years) hospitalized between February 2020 and November 2022. Of these, 321 (18.6%, CI: 16.8–20.4%) had at least one condition defining immune suppression. Immune suppressed subjects were more likely to have other co-morbidities (80.4% vs. 69.8%, p < 0.001) and be vaccinated (37% vs. 12.7%, p < 0.001). We evaluated the contribution of immune suppression to hospitalization during the various stages of the epidemic and investigated whether immune suppression contributed to severe outcomes and death, also considering the vaccination status of the patients. The proportion of immune suppressed patients among all hospitalizations (initially stable at <20%) started to increase around December 2021, and remained high (30–50%). This change coincided with an increase in the proportions of older patients and patients with co-morbidities and with a decrease in the proportion of patients with severe outcomes. Vaccinated patients showed a lower proportion of severe outcomes; among non-vaccinated patients, severe outcomes were more common in immune suppressed individuals. Immune suppression was a significant predictor of severe outcomes, after adjusting for age, sex, co-morbidities, period of hospitalization, and vaccination status (OR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.23–2.19), while vaccination was a protective factor (OR: 0.31; 95% IC: 0.20–0.47). However, after November 2021, differences in disease outcomes between vaccinated and non-vaccinated groups (for both immune suppressed and immune competent subjects) disappeared. Since December 2021, the spread of the less virulent Omicron variant and an overall higher level of induced and/or natural immunity likely contributed to the observed shift in hospitalized patient characteristics. Nonetheless, vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, likely in combination with naturally acquired immunity, effectively reduced severe outcomes in both immune competent (73.9% vs. 48.2%, p < 0.001) and immune suppressed (66.4% vs. 35.2%, p < 0.001) patients, confirming previous observations about the value of the vaccine in preventing serious disease

Awake videothoracoscopic biopsy of diffuse lung disease. Effects on pulmonary function and oxygenation

Surgical biopsy of diffuse lung disease (DLD) performed through general anesthesia has been associated with relatively high rate of pulmonary complications. Having hypothesized that videothoracoscopic biopsy of DLD could be feasible in awake patients, we have investigated its effects on pulmonary function and oxygenation. Twenty-one patients with DLD were enrolled in a pilot investigation entailing videothoracoscopic biopsy performed in awake patients through sole epidural anesthesia . Spirometry was performed preoperatively in sitting position (T0) and in lateral decubitus position either immediately before the operation (T1) and intraoperatively, after creation of the surgical pneumothorax (T2). Main cardiorespiratory data including mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), the ratio of arterial oxygen tension to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) and carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) were assessed at T1, T2, at the end of the operation (T3) and 1h after the operation (T4). Mean age was 58±11 years. At T0, FEV1, FVC and TLC were 2,2L (78%), 2,8L (75%) and 4,4L (74%), respectively. At T1, FEV1 and FVC decreased by 10±12% and 14±13%, respectively while at T2, by 48±5% and 45±6%, respectively. MAP and HR remained relatively stable throughout the procedure. PaO2/FiO2 decreased from 321±49 at T1 to 235±72 at T3 (P=0.0006) but improved up to 284±49 at T4. All patients tolerated satisfactorily the procedure. Histologic diagnosis was always obtained. There was no morbidity and mean hospital stay was 1.5±0.6 days. In our study cohort, changes in pulmonary function and oxygenation measures occurring during awake videothoracoscopic lung biopsy were satisfactorily tolerated by the patients and did not jeopardize its feasibility

Predicting survival in newly diagnosed idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a 3-year prospective study.

The natural history of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is not well defined and its clinical course is variable. We sought to investigate the survival and incidence of acute exacerbations (AEs) and their significant predictors in newly diagnosed patients. 70 patients newly diagnosed with IPF were prospectively followed for at least 3 yrs. Baseline evaluation included Medical Research Council dyspnoea score (MRCDS), 6-min walk test, pulmonary function tests, all of which were repeated at 6 months, and high-resolution computed tomography. A retrospective cohort of 68 patients was used for confirmation. Mean survival from the time of diagnosis was 30 months, with a 3-yr mortality of 46%. A Risk stratificatiOn ScorE (ROSE) based on MRCDS > 3, 6-min walking distance ≤ 72% predicted and composite physiologic index > 41 predicted 3-yr mortality with high specificity. 6-month progression of ROSE predicted rapid progression. 3-yr incidence of AE was 18.6%, mostly occurring in the first 18 months; risk factors for AE were concomitant emphysema and low diffusing coefficient of the lung for carbon monoxide. Results were confirmed in an independent cohort of patients. In newly diagnosed IPF, advanced disease at presentation, rapid progression and AEs are the determinants of 3-yr survival. The purpose of the multifactorial ROSE is to risk-stratify patients in order to predict survival and detect rapid disease progression