13 research outputs found
Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice from the British Society of Gastroenterology, the Royal College of Radiologists and the Royal College of Pathology.
Liver biopsy is required when clinically important information about the diagnosis, prognosis or management of a patient cannot be obtained by safer means, or for research purposes. There are several approaches to liver biopsy but predominantly percutaneous or transvenous approaches are used. A wide choice of needles is available and the approach and type of needle used will depend on the clinical state of the patient and local expertise but, for non-lesional biopsies, a 16-gauge needle is recommended. Many patients with liver disease will have abnormal laboratory coagulation tests or receive anticoagulation or antiplatelet medication. A greater understanding of the changes in haemostasis in liver disease allows for a more rational, evidence-based approach to peri-biopsy management. Overall, liver biopsy is safe but there is a small morbidity and a very small mortality so patients must be fully counselled. The specimen must be of sufficient size for histopathological interpretation. Communication with the histopathologist, with access to relevant clinical information and the results of other investigations, is essential for the generation of a clinically useful report
Retrospective Comparative Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Transradial Arterial Access for Hepatic Tumor Embolizations: A Single Operator Experience
Objectives To assess the efficacy and safety of transradial arterial access (TRA) for hepatic tumor embolizations and compare the outcomes between the TRA and transfemoral arterial access (TFA).
Materials and MethodsâA retrospective analysis of all consecutive hepatic tumor embolization procedures done through TFA or TRA by a single operator from November 2017 to April 2019 was performed. The procedural variables, including fluoroscopy time, radiation dose (reference air kerma [RAK]), conversion and complication rates, and patient preferences were recorded. The primary endpoint was technical success, which was defined as the successful completion of the embolization procedure. Procedural variables including radiation exposure and patient preferences, and complications were analyzed as secondary endpoints.
ResultsâOut of 102 procedures in 90 patients, 44 were performed through TFA and the rest by TRA. A technical success rate of 98.2% and a crossover rate of 1.7% were recorded for TRA. There were no major vascular complications and similar rates of minor complications (8.6% for TRA, 2.3% for TFA; Pâ=â0.055), without any clinical sequelae. After the initial learning curve, no significant differences for other procedural variables were noted between the two access sites. Faster ambulation were achieved following TRA (Pâ<â0.055). All 12 patients who underwent repeat TACE after initial TRA chose this again over TFA.
ConclusionsâTRA is safe and effective for hepatic tumor embolization. Its safety and efficacy profile is comparable to that of TFA, with added improved patient comfort and faster ambulation.
Advances in KnowledgeâNew catheter options and modifications of the existing techniques as explained in this article proved radial arterial access as a safe and effective alternative in hepatic arterial embolization
The prevalence and significance of thoracic findings in patients undergoing extended coverage computed tomography for assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms
Portal vein embolization before hepatectomy in patients with inadequate future liver remnant. A single instituition experienceportal vein embolization before hepatectomy in patients with inadequate future liver remnant. A single instituition experience
Covered TIPSS does not improve long term survival in refractory ascites - a single-centre experience
Portal decompression with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt prior to nonhepatic surgery
Portal decompression with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt prior to nonhepatic surgery:a single-center case series
An Extension of the Bollinger Scoring System to Analyse the Distribution of Macrovascular Disease of the Lower Limb in Diabetes.
OBJECTIVE
While it is generally considered that patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have more distal peripheral arterial disease (PAD), there is little information on how individual vessels are affected. The aim of this study was to adapt Bollinger's scoring system for lower limb angiograms (DSAs) to include the distal and planter vessels. The reliability of this extension was tested and was used to compare the distribution of disease in two cohorts of patients with and without DM.
METHODS
Patients who had undergone DSA ± angioplasty for PAD at a single centre between September 2010 and April 2014 were identified. Twenty-five patients' images were reviewed by four clinicians and scored using an extended version of the Bollinger score. A total of 153 patients with DM were matched, for age, sex, ethnicity, smoking, and hypertension, with 153 patients without DM. The infrainguinal vessels were divided into 16 arterial segments, including plantar vessels, and scored using the Bollinger score. The score ranges from 0 to 15. Fifteen represents an arterial segment with more than 50% of its length occluded. Interobserver reliability was tested using interclass correlation (ICC) and Cohen's kappa coefficient.
RESULTS
The ICC demonstrated good agreement between observers (0.76 [0.72-0.79]) with good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.93). When the Bollinger scores were categorised, the results were weaker, Cohen's kappa ranged from 0.39 (standard error 0.033) to 0.54 (0.030). Patients with DM had a higher burden of disease in the anterior tibial and posterior tibial arteries with relative sparing of the peroneal artery and no difference in the plantar vessels.
CONCLUSION
It has been demonstrated that the Bollinger score can be extended to include the distal vessels. This amended scoring system can be used to compare the burden of distal disease in patients with PAD. How the score relates to clinical presentation and outcomes needs further investigation
The potential of PIVKA-II as a treatment response biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective United Kingdom cohort study.
Prothrombin induced by vitamin K absence II (PIVKA-II) has recently been validated internationally as a diagnostic biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), as part of the GALAD model. However, its role as a treatment response biomarker has been less well explored. We, therefore, undertook a prospective study at a tertiary centre in the UK to evaluate the role of PIVKA-II as a treatment response biomarker in patients with early, intermediate and advanced stage HCC. In a cohort of 141 patients, we found that PIVKA-II levels tracked concordantly with treatment response in the majority of patients, across a range of different treatment modalities. We also found that rises in PIVKA-II levels almost always predated radiological progression. Among AFP non-secretors, PIVKA-II was found to be informative in 60% of cases. In a small cohort of patients undergoing liver transplantation, pre-transplant PIVKA-II levels predicted for microvascular invasion and poorer differentiation. Our results demonstrate the potential utility of PIVKA-II as a treatment response biomarker and in predicting microvascular invasion, in a Western population. PIVKA-II demonstrated improved performance over AFP but, as a single biomarker, its performance was still limited. Further larger prospective studies are recommended to evaluate PIVKA-II as a treatment response biomarker, within the GALAD model