5 research outputs found
Associations between neuropsychiatric symptoms and ADRD serum biomarkers in Mexican American and non-Hispanic white adults with mild cognitive impairment
Background: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a heterogenous diagnostic category with trajectories ranging from reversion to unimpaired cognition to progression to dementia. Neuropsychiatric symptoms such as depression and irritability are common and influence quality of life of patients and caregivers. The role of neuropsychiatric symptoms on disease biology, presentation, and course remains poorly understood. The goal of this study was to evaluate the associations between neuropsychiatric symptoms and serum ADRD biomarkers in Mexican American and non-Hispanic white participants diagnosed with MCI.
Method: Participants from the Texas Alzheimer’s Research and Care Consortium underwent a blood draw and clinical evaluation, including psychopathological and cognitive assessments. Diagnoses of MCI were adjudicated in consensus reviews. The presence and severity of neuropsychiatric symptoms were assessed by informant report using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). Serum levels of total tau, neurofilament light (NfL), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were assessed using Simoa HD-X Analyzer. Associations between NPI total score and individual items with serum biomarker levels were assessed using linear regression adjusted for age and sex.
Result: A total of 425 participants (mean age: 71 ± 9 years, 62% female, 74% Mexican American) had a diagnosis of MCI and serum ADRD biomarkers (Table 1). Total NPI score was not associated with total tau (ß=0.002, p=0.609), NfL (ß=0.001, p=0.658), or GFAP (ß=0.001, p=0.777). However, endorsement of appetite changes was associated with higher NfL (ß=0.077, p=0.006) and GFAP (ß=0.088, p=0.002) levels. Stratified analyses indicated associations of appetite changes with serum NfL (ß=0.108, p=0.002) and GFAP (ß=0.095, p=0.003) in Mexican Americans, but not in non-Hispanic whites (NfL: ß=0.022, p=0.633, GFAP: ß=0.102, p=0.066).There were no other significant associations between individual items on the NPI with serum biomarkers (p\u3e0.05, Bonferroni adjustment p±0.003).
Conclusion: Within Mexican American adults with MCI, changes in appetite were associated with higher serum NFL and GFAP levels. As elevations in circulating NfL and GFAP levels are associated with ADRD pathology and accelerated disease progression, appetite changes, a non-invasive and easily discernible behavioral phenotype, may predict higher likelihood of worsening cognitive course. Future longitudinal studies will be necessary to confirm predictive utility of appetite changes for disease progression
Post-intervention Status in Patients With Refractory Myasthenia Gravis Treated With Eculizumab During REGAIN and Its Open-Label Extension
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether eculizumab helps patients with anti-acetylcholine receptor-positive (AChR+) refractory generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) achieve the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) post-intervention status of minimal manifestations (MM), we assessed patients' status throughout REGAIN (Safety and Efficacy of Eculizumab in AChR+ Refractory Generalized Myasthenia Gravis) and its open-label extension. METHODS: Patients who completed the REGAIN randomized controlled trial and continued into the open-label extension were included in this tertiary endpoint analysis. Patients were assessed for the MGFA post-intervention status of improved, unchanged, worse, MM, and pharmacologic remission at defined time points during REGAIN and through week 130 of the open-label study. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients completed REGAIN and continued into the open-label study (eculizumab/eculizumab: 56; placebo/eculizumab: 61). At week 26 of REGAIN, more eculizumab-treated patients than placebo-treated patients achieved a status of improved (60.7% vs 41.7%) or MM (25.0% vs 13.3%; common OR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.1-4.5). After 130 weeks of eculizumab treatment, 88.0% of patients achieved improved status and 57.3% of patients achieved MM status. The safety profile of eculizumab was consistent with its known profile and no new safety signals were detected. CONCLUSION: Eculizumab led to rapid and sustained achievement of MM in patients with AChR+ refractory gMG. These findings support the use of eculizumab in this previously difficult-to-treat patient population. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: REGAIN, NCT01997229; REGAIN open-label extension, NCT02301624. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that, after 26 weeks of eculizumab treatment, 25.0% of adults with AChR+ refractory gMG achieved MM, compared with 13.3% who received placebo
Recommended from our members
Changes in Clinical Management of Patients with Schizophrenia Treated with Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics (LAIs), Including Telepsychiatry Use, During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Recommended from our members
Changes in Clinical Management of Patients with Schizophrenia Treated with Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics
Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic substantially impacted care of patients with schizophrenia treated with long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs). This study (OASIS-MAPS) examined how clinical sites adapted operations and used telepsychiatry to maintain standard of care for these patients during the pandemic. Methods: Two online surveys (initial: October--November 2020, N = 35; follow-up: July--September 2021, N = 21) were completed by a principal investigator (PI) or PI-appointed designee at sites participating in the OASIS study (NCT03919994). Survey responses were analyzed descriptively. Results: At the time of the initial survey, all 35 participating sites were using variants of telepsychiatry, with 20 sites adopting it after the pandemic started. Most sites reported no negative impacts of the pandemic on medication adherence, although approximately 20% of sites reported decreased adherence for LAIs. Twelve sites (34%) reported switching patients with schizophrenia from LAIs to oral antipsychotic medications, while 11 sites (31%) reported switching patients from shorter to longer injection interval LAIs during the pandemic. Most sites did not experience difficulties in implementing or expanding telepsychiatry services, although lower reimbursement rate for telepsychiatry and patients' lack of access to and training on relevant technologies were the most frequently reported barriers. Conclusion: Changes made by sites after the pandemic onset were viewed by almost all participants as satisfactory for maintaining standard of care. Almost all participants thought that the use of telepsychiatry services would continue after the pandemic in a hybrid manner combining telepsychiatry and office visits. Ensuring that patients have equitable access to telepsychiatry will be important in the post-pandemic future. Keywords: telehealth, coronavirus, care management, medication adherenceAcademi
Recommended from our members
Clinical Management of Patients with Schizophrenia Treated with Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics and Telepsychiatry Use During COVID-19 Pandemic
The COVID-19 pandemic substantially impacted care of patients with schizophrenia treated with long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs). This study examined how clinics adapted operations to maintain a standard of care for these patients after pandemic onset.
Online surveys were completed in October-November 2020 by one principal investigator (PI) or PI-appointed designee at 35 clinics participating in OASIS (NCT03919994). Items concerned pandemic impacts on clinic operations, particularly telepsychiatry, and on the care of patients with schizophrenia treated with LAIs.
All 35 clinics reported using telepsychiatry; 20 (57%) implemented telepsychiatry after pandemic onset. Telepsychiatry visits increased from 12%-15% to 45%-69% across outpatient visit types after pandemic onset; frequency of no-show and/or canceled telepsychiatry visits decreased by approximately one-third. Nearly half of clinics increased the frequency of telepsychiatry visits for patients with schizophrenia treated with LAIs. Approximately one-third of participants each reported switching patients treated with LAIs to longer injection interval LAIs or to oral antipsychotics. The most common system/clinic- and patient-related barrier for telepsychiatry visits was lower reimbursement rate and access to technology/reliable internet, respectively. Almost all participants (94%) were satisfied with telepsychiatry for maintaining care of patients with schizophrenia treated with LAIs; most predicted a hybrid of telepsychiatry and office visits post-pandemic.
Changes made by clinics after pandemic onset were viewed by almost all participants as satisfactory for maintaining a standard of care for patients with schizophrenia treated with LAIs. Most participants predicted continuing telepsychiatry to support patient care post-pandemic; equitable access to telepsychiatry will be important in this regard.
Alkermes, Inc