2 research outputs found
Feasibility and initial experience of left radial approach for diagnostic neuroangiography.
Neuroangiography has seen a recent shift from transfemoral to transradial access. In transradial neuroangiography, the right dominant hand is the main access used. However, the left side may be used specifically for left posterior circulation pathologies and when right access cannot be used. This study describes our initial experience with left radial access for diagnostic neuroangiography and assesses the feasibility and safety of this technique. We performed a retrospective review of a prospective database of consecutive patients between April 2018 and January 2020, and identified 20 patients whom a left radial access was used for neurovascular procedures. Left transradial neuroangiography was successful in all 20 patients and provided the sought diagnostic information; no patient required conversion to right radial or femoral access. Pathology consisted of anterior circulation aneurysms in 17 patients (85%), brain tumor in 1 patient (5%), and intracranial atherosclerosis disease involving the middle cerebral artery in 2 patients (10%). The left radial artery was accessed at the anatomic snuffbox in 18 patients (90%) and the wrist in 2 patients (10%). A single vessel was accessed in 7 (35%), two vessels in 8 (40%), three vessels in 4 (20%), and four vessels in 1 (5%). Catheterization was successful in 71% of the cases for the right internal carotid artery and in only 7.7% for the left internal carotid artery. There were no instances of radial artery spasm, radial artery occlusion, or procedural complications. Our initial experience found the left transradial access to be a potentially feasible approach for diagnostic neuroangiography even beyond the left vertebral artery. The approach is strongly favored by patients but has significant limitations compared with the right-sided approach
Recommended from our members
Closure Techniques
The superficial location of the radial artery access site eliminates the need for overly specialized closure devices. Manual compression is considered the gold standard technique. Closure devices in their many iterations are designed to work by applying continuous pressure using an adjustable balloon. They are arguably superior to manual compression as they exert a continuous and gentle pressure on the artery. The simplest, and cheapest devices might be the best ones. A good closure technique ensures compression with a “just needed” intensity to maintain anterograde flow. A good technique also incorporates the principle of patent hemostasis with or without prophylactic ulnar artery occlusion while keeping the whole process relatively simple. These techniques result in fewer radial artery occlusions and other complications. Lower complications ensure patency of the radial artery for future procedures