Safety of an ofloxacin-based antitubercular regimen for the treatment of tuberculosis in patients with underlying chronic liver disease: a preliminary report

Background and Aims: Hepatotoxicity is a major side-effect of antitubercular drugs (ATD). As these drugs are metabolized in the liver, there is a theoretical risk of increased hepatotoxicity in patients with underlying chronic liver disease (CLD). Ofloxacin has antitubercular activity and has exclusive renal clearance. The aim was to study the efficacy and safety of an ofloxacin-based antitubercular regimen for treating tuberculosis in patients with underlying CLD. Methods: Thirty-one cases were randomly assigned to two drug regimens using WHO dosage schedules: (i) regimen A (n = 15): isoniazid, rifampicin and ethambutol for 2 months, followed by isoniazid and rifampicin for a further 7 months; and (ii) regimen B (n = 16): isoniazid, pyrazinamide, ethambutol and ofloxacin for 2 months, followed by isoniazid, ethambutol and ofloxacin for a further 10 months. Hepatotoxicity was diagnosed if alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase increased > fivefold from the baseline or to > 400 IU/L, or if bilirubin increased by > 2.5 mg/dL from the baseline. Results: The response to ATD was achieved in all the patients who completed the therapy. Four (26.6%) patients on regimen A developed hepatotoxicity as compared to none on regimen B (P = 0.043). None of these patients could be restarted on ATD using the same regimen A because of the persistently deranged liver functions. Conclusions: In patients with tuberculosis who have underlying CLD: (i) an ofloxacin-based antitubercular regimen without rifampicin is as effective as a rifampicin-based regimen; and (ii) a combination of isoniazid with rifampicin is more hepatotoxic than a combination with ofloxacin and pyrazinamide

Acute-on-chronic liver failure: consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific association for the study of the liver (APASL): an update Authors Authors and affiliations

The first consensus report of the working party of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) set up in 2004 on acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) was published in 2009. With international groups volunteering to join, the APASL ACLF Research Consortium (AARC) was formed in 2012, which continued to collect prospective ACLF patient data. Based on the prospective data analysis of nearly 1400 patients, the AARC consensus was published in 2014. In the past nearly four-and-a-half years, the AARC database has been enriched to about 5200 cases by major hepatology centers across Asia. The data published during the interim period were carefully analyzed and areas of contention and new developments in the field of ACLF were prioritized in a systematic manner. The AARC database was also approached for answering some of the issues where published data were limited, such as liver failure grading, its impact on the \u27Golden Therapeutic Window\u27, extrahepatic organ dysfunction and failure, development of sepsis, distinctive features of acute decompensation from ACLF and pediatric ACLF and the issues were analyzed. These initiatives concluded in a two-day meeting in October 2018 at New Delhi with finalization of the new AARC consensus. Only those statements, which were based on evidence using the Grade System and were unanimously recommended, were accepted. Finalized statements were again circulated to all the experts and subsequently presented at the AARC investigators meeting at the AASLD in November 2018. The suggestions from the experts were used to revise and finalize the consensus. After detailed deliberations and data analysis, the original definition of ACLF was found to withstand the test of time and be able to identify a homogenous group of patients presenting with liver failure. New management options including the algorithms for the management of coagulation disorders, renal replacement therapy, sepsis, variceal bleed, antivirals and criteria for liver transplantation for ACLF patients were proposed. The final consensus statements along with the relevant background information and areas requiring future studies are presented here

Acute variceal bleeding portends poor outcomes in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure: A propensity score matched study from the APASL ACLF Research Consortium (AARC)

Background and aims: Limited data exist regarding outcomes of acute variceal bleeding (AVB) in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), especially in those with hepatic failure. We evaluated the outcomes of AVB in patients with ACLF in a multinational cohort of APASL ACLF Research Consortium (AARC).Methods: Prospectively maintained data from AARC database on patients with ACLF who developed AVB (ACLF-AVB) was analysed. This data included demographic profile, severity of liver disease, and rebleeding and mortality in 6 weeks. These outcomes were compared with a propensity score matched (PSM) cohort of ACLF matched for severity of liver disease (MELD, AARC score) without AVB (ACLF without AVB).Results: Of the 4434 ACLF patients, the outcomes in ACLF-AVB (n = 72) [mean age-46 ± 10.4 years, 93% males, 66% with alcoholic liver disease, 65% with alcoholic hepatitis, AARC score: 10.1 ± 2.2, MELD score: 34 (IQR: 27-40)] were compared with a PSM cohort selected in a ratio of 1:2 (n = 143) [mean age-44.9 ± 12.5 years, 82.5% males, 48% alcoholic liver disease, 55.7% alcoholic hepatitis, AARC score: 9.4 ± 1.5, MELD score: 32 (IQR: 24-40)] of ACLF-without AVB. Despite PSM, ACLF patients with AVB had a higher baseline HVPG than without AVB (25.00 [IQR: 23.00-28.00] vs. 17.00 [15.00-21.75] mmHg; p = 0.045). The 6-week mortality in ACLF patients with or without AVB was 70.8% and 53.8%, respectively (p = 0.025). The 6-week rebleeding rate was 23% in ACLF-AVB. Presence of ascites [hazard ratio (HR) 2.2 (95% CI 1.03-9.8), p = 0.026], AVB [HR 1.9 (95% CI 1.2-2.5, p = 0.03)], and MELD score [HR 1.7 (95% CI 1.1-2.1), p = 0.001] independently predicted mortality in the overall ACLF cohort.Conclusion: Development of AVB confers poor outcomes in patients with ACLF with a high 6-week mortality. Elevated HVPG at baseline represents a potential risk factor for future AVB in ACLF