Two-dimensional differential in-gel electrophoresis-based proteomics of male gametes in relation to oxidative stress

Objective: To identify the relative abundance of proteins in pooled reactive oxygen species (ROS)-positive (ROSþ) and ROS-negative (ROSÀ) semen samples with the use of two-dimensional differential in-gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE). Design: Spermatozoa suspensions from ROSþ and ROSÀ groups by 2D-DIGE analysis. Setting: Tertiary hospital. Patient(s): 20 donors and 32 infertile men. Intervention(s): Seminal ejaculates evaluated for semen and proteomic analysis. Main Outcome Measure(s): Semen samples from 20 donors and 32 infertile men were pooled, divided into ROSþ and ROSÀ groups based on the cutoff value of <20 relative light units/s/10 6 sperm and frozen. From each pooled group, spermatozoa were labeled with Cy3/Cy5 fluorescent dye. Duplicate 2D-DIGE gels were run. Image analysis was performed with the use of Decider software. Protein spots exhibiting R1.5-fold difference in intensity were excised from the preparatory gel and identified by liquid chromatographymass spectrometry. Data were analyzed with the use of Sequest and Blast programs. Result(s): A total of 1,343 protein spots in gel 1 (ROSÀ) and 1,265 spots in gel 2 (ROSþ) were detected. The majority of protein spots had similar expression, with 31 spots were differentially expressed. Six spots were significantly decreased and 25 increased in the ROSÀ sample compared with the ROSþ sample. Conclusion(s): Significantly different expression of protective proteins against oxidative stress was found in ROSÀcompared with ROSþ samples. These differences may explain the role of oxidation species in the pathology of male infertility. (Fertil Steril Ò 2013;99:1216-26. Ó2013 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

Paternal effect on genomic activation, clinical pregnancy and live birth rate after ICSI with cryopreserved epididymal versus testicular spermatozoa

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This study takes an in depth look at embryonic development, implantation, pregnancy and live birth rates with frozen epididymal and testicular sperm from obstructed (OA) and non-obstructed (NOA) patients.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Paternal effect of sperm source on zygote formation, embryonic cleavage, and genomic activation were examined. Additional outcome parameters monitored were clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), implantation rate (IR) and live birth rate.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In this report, we retrospectively analyzed 156 ICSI cycles using cryopreserved epididymal sperm (ES; n = 77) or testicular sperm (TESE; n = 79). The developmental potential of embryos did not appear to be influenced by the type of surgically retrieved sperm. The average number of blastomeres observed on Day 3 was not different among different groups; 7.5 +/- 1.7 (ES), 7.6 +/- 2.1 (TESE-OA) and 6.5 +/- 2.3 (TESE-NOA). Compaction and blastulation rates, both indicators of paternal genomic activation, were similar in embryos derived from ICSI with ES or TESE from OA as well as NOA men. The only parameter significantly affected in NOA-TESE cases was the fertilization rate. CPR and IR with cryopreserved TESE (TESE-OA 59%, 34%, and TESE-NOA 37%, 20%) were also not statistically different, from that achieved with cryopreserved ES (61% and 39%). Live birth rates also appeared to be independent of sperm type. The 87 clinical pregnancies established using cryopreserved TESE and ES, resulted in the birth of 115 healthy infants. No congenital anomalies were noted.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Zygotic activation seems to be independent of sperm origin and type of azoospermia.</p

Empiric medical therapy with hormonal agents for idiopathic male infertility

Introduction: Infertility affects approximately 15% of all couples, and male factor contribute to up to 50% of cases. Unfortunately, the cause of male infertility is unknown in about 30% of these cases. Infertility of unknown origin is classified as idiopathic male infertility when abnormal semen parameters are present. Despite not having a definable cause, these men may respond to treatment. This review focuses on the use of empiric hormonal therapies for idiopathic male infertility. Methods: A detailed PubMed/MEDLINE search was conducted to identify all publications pertaining to empiric use of hormonal therapies in the treatment of idiopathic male infertility using the keywords “idiopathic,” “male infertility,” “empiric treatment,” “clomiphene,” “SERM,” “gonadotropin,” “aromatase inhibitor,” and “androgen.” These manuscripts were reviewed to identify treatment modalities and results. Results: Gonadotropins, androgens, aromatase inhibitors, and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) have all been used with varying results. The studies on these treatments are of variable quality. The most well-studied agents are the SERMs which show a modest increase in semen parameters and pregnancy rates. Aromatase inhibitors are most effective in non-idiopathic patients. Gonadotropin treatment is limited by their inconvenience and relative ineffectiveness in this population. Testosterone suppresses spermatogenesis and should not be used to treat infertility. Conclusion: Gonadotropins, SERMs, and aromatase inhibitors may improve semen parameters and hormone levels in men with idiopathic infertility with the best results from SERMs. Testosterone should never be used to treat infertility. Large multicenter randomized controlled studies are needed to better determine the success of empiric use of hormonal therapy on pregnancy rates

Office-based sperm retrieval for treatment of infertility.

This article describes sperm retrieval procedures that may be performed in an office setting. Indications for sperm retrieval, preprocedural preparation, and anesthetic considerations are discussed. Vasal sperm aspiration, percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration, microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration, testicular sperm aspiration, conventional, and microdissection testicular sperm extraction are reviewed. Success and complication rates as well as factors that may influence success (histopathology, cancerous cause, Klinefelter syndrome, Y microdeletions, varicocele, and hormone administration) are reviewed

Varicocele management for infertility and pain: A systematic review

Despite being first described two thousand years ago, the varicocele remains a controversial multifaceted disease process with numerous biological consequences including infertility, hypogonadism, and chronic orchidalgia. The underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood and likely include hypoxia, oxidative stress, hyperthermia, anatomical aberrations, and genetics as primary components. Despite a high prevalence amongst asymptomatic fertile men, varicoceles paradoxically also represent the most common correctable cause for male infertility. In this systematic review we discuss the rich historical aspects of the varicocele and the contemporary data regarding its clinical manifestations. We performed a systematic literature review with the goal of comparing outcomes and complication rates of each of the major surgical approaches as they relate to infertility and pain. We performed a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)-compliant systematic literature review for manuscripts focused on varicocele and its biological consequences. We identified 112 studies suitable for qualitative analysis and included 56 of these for quantitative analysis, with an emphasis on infertility and chronic pain outcomes. Taken together, the clinical work to date suggests that the highest fertility rates and the lowest complication rates are associated with the microsurgical subinguinal surgical approach to varicocelectomy. In all, 26–40% of patients undergoing varicocelectomy will successfully achieve short-term spontaneous pregnancy, and up to 90% of all patients undergoing varicocelectomy for pain will have improvement and/or resolution of their symptoms. Taken together, the data support an ongoing role for varicocelectomy in both of these clinical arenas. Keywords: Varicocele, Infertility, Orchidalgia, Hypogonadism, Pampiniform plexu

Male InfertilityA Complete Guide to Lifestyle and Environmental Factors /

XXI, 268 p. 26 illus., 23 illus. in color.online

The economic burden of genetic tests for the infertile male: a pilot algorithm to improve test predictive value.

PURPOSE: We developed a model to optimize genetic testing in infertile men with nonobstructive azoospermia and severe oligospermia. We also assessed the optimal cutoff value of the predicted probability of advising genetic testing and evaluated the direct cost saving of using the model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of infertile men who underwent Y microdeletion and karyotype testing at our fertility center from 2006 to 2012. Semen parameters, testicular volume, testosterone, luteinizing hormone, follicular stimulating hormone and varicocele were assessed as potential predictors of genetic disorders. We fitted logistic regression to all predictors and selected a nomogram based on the concordance index and calibration. We calculated the cost saving of using the model. RESULTS: Of 325 patients 278 fulfilled study inclusion criteria, including 27 with an abnormal karyotype, 11 with a Y microdeletion and 1 with each condition. We developed a nomogram using sperm concentration and motility, testicular volume and serum testosterone level. The nomogram concordance index was 0.738. The optimal cutoff value was 13.8% with 0.788 sensitivity, 0.590 specificity, 0.245 positive predictive value and 0.943 negative predictive value. Testing men above the 13.8% cutoff resulted in a direct 45% cost saving. However, 15.4% of genetic anomalies were missed, including 2 Y microdeletions. CONCLUSIONS: Using common clinical and laboratory parameters our nomogram detects 84.6% of genetic anomalies. Nomogram use resulted in a 45% direct cost saving but carries the risk of missing pertinent genetic abnormalities

Spermaturia after Radical Prostatectomy: Is Surgical Preservation of Fertility Possible?

Ease of sperm retrieval has not been previously described as a goal for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer; however preservation of fertility is a known concern for some younger prostate cancer patients. We present the first known case of a patient with postejaculatory spermaturia following robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. We hypothesize that this is due to fistula formation between the vas deferens and the urinary tract