68 research outputs found

    Requiem for the suburethral tape

    Full text link

    The design and implementation of a study to investigate the effectiveness of community vs hospital eye service follow-up for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration with quiescent disease

    Get PDF
    IntroductionStandard treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF drugs. Following multiple injections, nAMD lesions often become quiescent but there is a high risk of reactivation, and regular review by hospital ophthalmologists is the norm. The present trial examines the feasibility of community optometrists making lesion reactivation decisions.MethodsThe Effectiveness of Community vs Hospital Eye Service (ECHoES) trial is a virtual trial; lesion reactivation decisions were made about vignettes that comprised clinical data, colour fundus photographs, and optical coherence tomograms displayed on a web-based platform. Participants were either hospital ophthalmologists or community optometrists. All participants were provided with webinar training on the disease, its management, and assessment of the retinal imaging outputs. In a balanced design, 96 participants each assessed 42 vignettes; a total of 288 vignettes were assessed seven times by each professional group.The primary outcome is a participant's judgement of lesion reactivation compared with a reference standard. Secondary outcomes are the frequency of sight threatening errors; judgements about specific lesion components; participant-rated confidence in their decisions about the primary outcome; cost effectiveness of follow-up by optometrists rather than ophthalmologists.DiscussionThis trial addresses an important question for the NHS, namely whether, with appropriate training, community optometrists can make retreatment decisions for patients with nAMD to the same standard as hospital ophthalmologists. The trial employed a novel approach as participation was entirely through a web-based application; the trial required very few resources compared with those that would have been needed for a conventional randomised controlled clinical trial

    The use of mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage repair and regeneration: a systematic review.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: The management of articular cartilage defects presents many clinical challenges due to its avascular, aneural and alymphatic nature. Bone marrow stimulation techniques, such as microfracture, are the most frequently used method in clinical practice however the resulting mixed fibrocartilage tissue which is inferior to native hyaline cartilage. Other methods have shown promise but are far from perfect. There is an unmet need and growing interest in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering to improve the outcome for patients requiring cartilage repair. Many published reviews on cartilage repair only list human clinical trials, underestimating the wealth of basic sciences and animal studies that are precursors to future research. We therefore set out to perform a systematic review of the literature to assess the translation of stem cell therapy to explore what research had been carried out at each of the stages of translation from bench-top (in vitro), animal (pre-clinical) and human studies (clinical) and assemble an evidence-based cascade for the responsible introduction of stem cell therapy for cartilage defects. This review was conducted in accordance to PRISMA guidelines using CINHAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and Web of Knowledge databases from 1st January 1900 to 30th June 2015. In total, there were 2880 studies identified of which 252 studies were included for analysis (100 articles for in vitro studies, 111 studies for animal studies; and 31 studies for human studies). There was a huge variance in cell source in pre-clinical studies both of terms of animal used, location of harvest (fat, marrow, blood or synovium) and allogeneicity. The use of scaffolds, growth factors, number of cell passages and number of cells used was hugely heterogeneous. SHORT CONCLUSIONS: This review offers a comprehensive assessment of the evidence behind the translation of basic science to the clinical practice of cartilage repair. It has revealed a lack of connectivity between the in vitro, pre-clinical and human data and a patchwork quilt of synergistic evidence. Drivers for progress in this space are largely driven by patient demand, surgeon inquisition and a regulatory framework that is learning at the same pace as new developments take place

    Neurourology & Female Urology

    No full text

    Neurourology & Female Urology

    No full text

    Habits and Preferences in Sunscreen Usage Among Healthcare Professionals in the UK

    No full text
    Ilia Anna Petrou,1 Siao Pei Tan,2 Andrew J Birnie2 1Dermatology Department, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; 2Dermatology Department, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, Kent, UKCorrespondence: Ilia Anna Petrou, Friends Dermatology Centre, Kent & Canterbury Hospital, 1937 Building- Main Floor, Ethelbert Road, Canterbury, Kent, CT1 3NG, UK, Email [email protected]: Raising awareness about sun protection is an ongoing challenge. In 2018, a Survey Monkey questionnaire was distributed among healthcare professionals in the United Kingdom looking at their own habits of sunscreen usage. A total of 165 responses were collected. Eighty-nine percent of our respondents would use sunscreen when outdoors 11am– 3pm on a cloudless, sunny day in August in the UK. However, only 27% of these healthcare professionals would regularly reapply sunscreen every 2 hours. The most important reason for using sunscreen was avoiding sunburn (importance weighted average of 4.71, on a scale from 1 to 5), followed by avoiding skin cancer (4.49) and skin ageing (4.06). On an importance scale from 1 to 5, the most important sunscreen characteristics, when choosing or recommending a product, were the level of UVA protection (importance weighted average 4.48), its stickiness (3.85) and degree of water-resistance (3.77).Keywords: photodermatology, ultraviolet radiation, cance
    • …
    corecore