10 research outputs found
The importance of left ventricular function for long-term outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In the present study we sought to determine the long-term prognostic value of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), assessed by planar radionuclide ventriculography (PRV), after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In total 925 patients underwent PRV for LVEF assessment after PPCI for myocardial infarction before discharge from the hospital. PRV was performed with a standard dose of 500 Mbq of <sup>99m</sup>Tc-pertechnetate. Average follow-up time was 2.5 years.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Mean (± SD) age was 60 ± 12 years. Mean (± SD) LVEF was 45.7 ± 12.2 %. 1 year survival was 97.3 % and 3 year survival was 94.2 %. Killip class, multi vessel-disease, previous cardiovascular events, peak creatin kinase and its MB fraction, age and LVEF proved to be univariate predictors of mortality. When entered in a forward conditional Cox regression model age and LVEF were independent predictors of 1 and 3 year mortality.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>LVEF assessed by PRV is a powerful independent predictor of long term mortality after PPCI for STEMI.</p
Cardiac output and cardiac index measured with cardiovascular magnetic resonance in healthy subjects, elite athletes and patients with congestive heart failure
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) enables non-invasive quantification of cardiac output (CO) and thereby cardiac index (CI, CO indexed to body surface area). The aim of this study was to establish if CI decreases with age and compare the values to CI for athletes and for patients with congestive heart failure (CHF).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>CI was measured in 144 healthy volunteers (39 ± 16 years, range 21–81 years, 68 females), in 60 athletes (29 ± 6 years, 30 females) and in 157 CHF patients with ejection fraction (EF) below 40% (60 ± 13 years, 33 females). CI was calculated using aortic flow by velocity-encoded CMR and is presented as mean ± SD. Flow was validated in vitro using a flow phantom and in 25 subjects with aorta and pulmonary flow measurements.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>There was a slight decrease of CI with age in healthy subjects (8 ml/min/m<sup>2</sup> per year, r<sup>2</sup> = 0.07, p = 0.001). CI in males (3.2 ± 0.5 l/min/m<sup>2</sup>) and females (3.1 ± 0.4 l/min/m<sup>2</sup>) did not differ (p = 0.64). The mean ± SD of CI in healthy subjects in the age range of 20–29 was 3.3 ± 0.4 l/min/m<sup>2</sup>, in 30–39 years 3.3 ± 0.5 l/min/m<sup>2</sup>, in 40–49 years 3.1 ± 0.5 l/min/m<sup>2</sup>, 50–59 years 3.0 ± 0.4 l/min/m<sup>2</sup> and >60 years 3.0 ± 0.4 l/min/m<sup>2</sup>. There was no difference in CI between athletes and age-controlled healthy subjects but HR was lower and indexed SV higher in athletes. CI in CHF patients (2.3 ± 0.6 l/min/m<sup>2</sup>) was lower compared to the healthy population (p < 0.001). There was a weak correlation between CI and EF in CHF patients (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.07, p < 0.001) but CI did not differ between patients with NYHA-classes I-II compared to III-IV (n = 97, p = 0.16) or patients with or without hospitalization in the previous year (n = 100, p = 0.72). In vitro phantom validation showed low bias (−0.8 ± 19.8 ml/s) and in vivo validation in 25 subjects also showed low bias (0.26 ± 0.61 l/min, QP/QS 1.04 ± 0.09) between pulmonary and aortic flow.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>CI decreases in healthy subjects with age but does not differ between males and females. We found no difference in CI between athletes and healthy subjects at rest but CI was lower in patients with congestive heart failure. The presented values can be used as reference values for flow velocity mapping CMR.</p
Heart function analysis in cardiac patients with focus on sex-specific aspects
Cardiac function is best described by investigating the pressure-volume relationships. This information permits description in terms of the ventricular volume regulation graph (VRG), estimation of systolic elastance, evaluation of lusitropic properties, and assessment of ventriculo-arterial coupling. Current techniques yield noninvasive determination of cardiac compartmental volumes, along with systolic/diastolic arterial pressure, while ventricular end-diastolic pressure can be inferred from an echocardiography-based surrogate measure. Ventricular volume is known to vary with age, as well as to be affected by intrinsic cardiac disease and abnormalities of the vascular system. Moreover, 35 years ago it has been shown in healthy adults that left ventricular volume is significantly smaller in women compared to men. This important observation has serious implications for several metrics which are routinely used in clinical practice, e.g., ejection fraction. The remarkable difference between ventricular size in men and women is also a powerful starting point for the study of aging and the investigation of interventions such as exercise. In this review we evaluate sex-specific characteristics of the VRG and the implications for various cardiac patient populations, during basal conditions and intervention such as exercise