21 research outputs found
Giant secreting adrenal myelolipoma in a man: a case report
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Introduction</p> <p>Adrenal myelolipoma is a rare, benign neoplasm that is usually asymptomatic, unilateral and nonsecreting. It develops within the adrenal gland and is composed of mature adipose tissue with elements of the hematopoietic series. We describe the case of what is, to the best of our knowledge, one of the largest secreting adrenal myelolipomas reported in the literature.</p> <p>Case presentation</p> <p>A 52-year-old Caucasian man of medium build who had had moderate hypertension for three years presented to our hospital. He had no other significant symptoms. His hypertension was pharmacologically treated. He came to our hospital to undergo abdominal ultrasonography during a clinical checkup. The ultrasound scan showed the presence of a voluminous hyperechoic mass interposed between the spleen and the left kidney. It was reported as a myelolipoma of the left kidney on the basis of its structural characteristics and position. Computed tomography confirmed our diagnosis. All preoperative biochemical tests were normal, with the exception of high serum cortisol, which was being overproduced by the lesion and was probably responsible for the patient's hypertension. He underwent successful surgery, and his postoperative course was uneventful. The pathologic examination of the lesion confirmed the diagnosis of adrenal myelolipoma. The patient's blood pressure returned to within the normal range.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The "incidental" discovery of an adrenal mass requires careful diagnostic study to plan adequate therapeutic management. Both of the primary investigations at our disposal, ultrasound and blood tests (adrenal hormones), helped in rendering the diagnosis and allowed us to move toward the most appropriate treatment, taking into account the size of the tumor and its probable hormonal production.</p
Coexistence of a colon carcinoma with two distinct renal cell carcinomas: a case report
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Introduction</p> <p>We present the case of a patient with two tumors in his left kidney and a synchronous colon cancer. While coexisting tumors have been previously described in the same kidney or the kidney and other organs, or the colon and other organs, to the best of our knowledge no such concurrency of three primary tumors has been reported in the literature to date.</p> <p>Case presentation</p> <p>A 72-year-old man of Greek nationality presenting with pain in the right hypochondrium underwent a series of examinations that revealed gallstones, a tumor in the hepatic flexure of the colon and an additional tumor in the upper pole of the left kidney. He was subjected to a right hemicolectomy, left nephrectomy and cholecystectomy, and his postoperative course was uneventful. Histopathology examinations showed a mucinous colon adenocarcinoma, plus two tumors in the left kidney, a papillary renal cell carcinoma and a chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This case underlines the need to routinely scan patients pre-operatively in order to exclude coexisting tumors, especially asymptomatic renal tumors in patients with colorectal cancer, and additionally to screen concurrent tumors genetically in order to detect putative common genetic alterations.</p
Simultaneous laparoscopic management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction and renal lithiasis: the combined experience of two academic centers and review of the literature
Konstantinos G Stravodimos,1 Stilianos Giannakopoulos,2 Stavros I Tyritzis,1 Aristeides Alevizopoulos,1 Stefanos Papadoukakis,1 Stavros Touloupidis,2 Constantinos A Constantinides11Department of Urology, Athens University Medical School, Laiko Hospital, Athens, 2Department of Urology, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, GreeceIntroduction: Approximately one out of five patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) present lithiasis in the same setting. We present our outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic management of UPJO and pelvic or calyceal lithiasis and review the current literature.Methods: Thirteen patients, with a mean age of 42.8±13.3 years were diagnosed with UPJO and pelvic or calyceal lithiasis. All patients were subjected to laparoscopic dismembered Hynes–Anderson pyeloplasty along with removal of single or multiple stones, using a combination of laparoscopic graspers, irrigation, and flexible nephroscopy with nitinol baskets.Results: The mean operative time was 218.8±66 minutes. In two cases, transposition of the ureter due to crossing vessels was performed. The mean diameter of the largest stone was 0.87±0.25 cm and the mean number of stones retrieved was 8.2 (1–32). Eleven out of 13 patients (84.6%) were rendered stone-free. Complications included prolonged urine output from the drain in one case (Clavien grade I) and urinoma formation requiring drainage in another case (Clavien grade IIIa). The mean postoperative follow-up was 30.2 (7–51) months. No patient has experienced stone or UPJO recurrence.Conclusion: Laparoscopy for the management of UPJO along with renal stone removal seems a very appealing treatment, with all the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. Concomitant renal stones do not affect the outcome of laparoscopic pyeloplasty, at least in the midterm. According to our results and the latest literature data, we advocate laparoscopic management as the treatment of choice for these cases.Keywords: laparoscopic pyeloplasty, lithiasis, ureteropelvic junction obstructio