Clinical and laboratory findings associated with severe scrub typhus

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Scrub typhus is a mite-borne bacterial infection of humans caused by <it>Orientia tsutsugamushi </it>that causes a generalized vasculitis that may involve the tissues of any organ system. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated to severe complications from scrub typhus.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We conducted this prospective, case-control study on scrub typhus patients who presented to the Department of Internal Medicine at Chosun University Hospital between September, 2004 and December, 2006. Cases were 89 scrub typhus patients with severe complications and controls were 119 scrub typhus patients without severe complications.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>There were significant differences in the absence of eschar, white blood cell (WBC) counts, hemoglobin, albumin, serum creatinine, fibrinogen, C-reactive protein (CRP), and active partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) between the two groups. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only the following four factors were significantly associated with the severe complications of scrub typhus: (1) age ≥ 60 years (odd ratio [OR] = 3.13, <it>P </it>= 0.002, confidence interval [CI] = 1.53-6.41), (2) the absence of eschar (OR = 6.62, <it>P </it>= 0.03, CI = 1.22-35.8, (3) WBC counts > 10, 000/mm3 (OR = 3.6, <it>P </it>= 0.001, CI = 1.65-7.89), and (4) albumin ≤ 3.0 g/dL (OR = 5.01, <it>P </it>= 0.004, CI = 1.69-14.86).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our results suggest that clinicians should be aware of the potential for complications, when scrub typhus patients are older (≥ 60 years), presents without eschar, or laboratory findings such as WBC counts > 10, 000/mm3, and serum albumin level ≤ 3.0 g/dL. Close observation and intensive care for scrub typhus patients with the potential for complications may prevent serious complications with subsequent reduction in its mortality rate.</p

The usefulness of arbekacin compared to vancomycin

The bacteriological efficacy response (improved, arbekacin vs. vancomycin; 71.2% vs. 79.5%) and clinical efficacy response (improved, arbekacin vs. vancomycin; 65.3% vs. 76.1%) were not statistically different between the two groups. The complication rate was significantly higher in the vancomycin group (32.9%) compared to the arbekacin group (15.1%) (p = 0.019). Arbekacin was not inferior to vancomycin, and it could be a good alternative drug for vancomycin in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) treatment

The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Guidelines for Radiofrequency Ablative Procedures in Patients with Implanted Devices

Timothy Sowder,1 Dawood Sayed,1 Tyler Concannon,1 Scott H Pew,2 Natalie H Strand,2 Alaa Abd-Elsayed,3 Christopher S Wie,2 Daniel E Gomez Ramos,4 Ahmed M Raslan,5 Timothy R Deer6 1Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA; 2Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA; 3Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA; 4Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA; 5Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA; 6The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USACorrespondence: Timothy Sowder, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Mail Stop 1034, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA, Tel +1-913-588-6670, Fax +1-913-588-3365, Email [email protected]: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a treatment modality used in interventional pain management to treat several conditions including chronic neck or back pain, sacroiliac joint pain, major joint pain, and pain from sites that can be isolated to a sensory nerve amenable to RFA. The goals of such procedures are to reduce pain, improve function, delay need for surgical intervention, and reduce pain medication consumption. As applications for RFA expand through novel techniques and nerve targets, there is concern with how RFA may impact patients with implanted medical devices. Specifically, the electrical currents used in RFA produce electromagnetic interference, which can result in unintentional energy transfer to implanted devices. This may also interfere with device function or cause damage to the device itself. As the number of patients with implanted devices increases, it is imperative to establish guidelines for the management of implanted devices during RFA procedures. This review aims to establish guidelines to assist physicians in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative management of implanted devices in patients undergoing procedures using radiofrequency energy. Here, we provide physicians with background knowledge and a summary of current evidence to allow safe utilization of RFA treatment in patients with implanted devices such as cardiac implantable electronic devices, spinal cord stimulators, intrathecal pumps, and deep brain stimulators. While these guidelines are intended to be comprehensive, each patient should be assessed on an individual basis to optimize outcomes.Keywords: radiofrequency ablation, implanted medical devices, cardiac implantable electronic device, spinal cord stimulator, intrathecal pump, deep brain stimulato