7 research outputs found
Mutually honest? Physiological ‘qualities' signalled by colour ornaments in monomorphic king penguins
Mate choice is expected to be important for the fitness of both sexes for species in which successful reproduction relies strongly on shared and substantial parental investment by males and females. Reciprocal selection may then favour the evolution of morphological signals providing mutual information on the condition/quality of tentative partners. However, because males and females often have differing physiological constraints, it is unclear which proximate physiological pathways guarantee the honesty of male and female signals in similarly ornamented species. We used the monomorphic king penguin (Aptenodytes patagonicus) as a model to investigate the physiological qualities signalled by colour and morphological ornaments known to be under sexual selection (coloration of the beak spots and size of auricular feather patches). In both sexes of this slow-breeding seabird, we investigated the links between ornaments and multiple indices of individual quality; including body condition, immunity, stress and energy status. In both sexes, individual innate immunity, resting metabolic rate, and the ability to mount a stress response in answer to an acute disturbance (capture) were similarly signalled by various aspects of beak coloration or auricular patch size. However, we also reveal interesting and contrasting relationships between males and females in how ornaments may signal individual quality. Body condition and oxidative stress status were signalled by beak coloration, although in opposite directions for the sexes. Over an exhaustive set of physiological variables, several suggestive patterns indicated the conveyance of honest information about mate quality in this monomorphic species. However, sex-specific patterns suggested that monomorphic ornaments may signal different information concerning body mass and oxidative balance of males and females, at least in king penguins
Body girth as an alternative to body mass for establishing condition indexes in field studies: a validation in the king penguin.
Body mass and body condition are often tightly linked to animal health and fitness in the wild and thus are key measures for ecophysiologists and behavioral ecologists. In some animals, such as large seabird species, obtaining indexes of structural size is relatively easy, whereas measuring body mass under specific field circumstances may be more of a challenge. Here, we suggest an alternative, easily measurable, and reliable surrogate of body mass in field studies, that is, body girth. Using 234 free-living king penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) at various stages of molt and breeding, we measured body girth under the flippers, body mass, and bill and flipper length. We found that body girth was strongly and positively related to body mass in both molting (R(2) = 0.91) and breeding (R(2) = 0.73) birds, with the mean error around our predictions being 6.4%. Body girth appeared to be a reliable proxy measure of body mass because the relationship did not vary according to year and experimenter, bird sex, or stage within breeding groups. Body girth was, however, a weak proxy of body mass in birds at the end of molt, probably because most of those birds had reached a critical depletion of energy stores. Body condition indexes established from ordinary least squares regressions of either body girth or body mass on structural size were highly correlated (r(s) = 0.91), suggesting that body girth was as good as body mass in establishing body condition indexes in king penguins. Body girth may prove a useful proxy to body mass for estimating body condition in field investigations and could likely provide similar information in other penguins and large animals that may be complicated to weigh in the wild
Interactions entre ruminants domestiques et sauvages - Parasitisme partagé et résistances
International audienceLes contacts entre la faune domestique et la faune sauvage sont nombreux, et peuvent permettre la transmission d’agents pathogènes entre ces deux réservoirs, de manière directe ou indirecte. Peu d’études se sont penchées sur la problématique des contaminations croisées de parasites, dont les parasites résistants aux anthelminthiques, entre faune sauvage et faune domestique. Un état des lieux des connaissances sur les échanges de parasites entre faune domestique et sauvage à partir des données publiées, ainsi que les résultats d’une étude récente en France, suggèrent que les échanges de parasites entre ces 2 réservoirs sont fréquents, notamment pour les parasites généralistes. Plus spécifiquement, de rares études récentes ont recherché, et mis en évidence, la présence de parasites résistants aux antiparasitaires dans la faune sauvage. Il en ressort que le rôle exact de la faune sauvage dans le maintien et la dispersion de parasites résistants, et/ou dans la dilution de la résistance dans les élevages reste encore largement à déterminer