No-go theorems for \psi-epistemic models based on a continuity assumption

The quantum state \psi is a mathematical object used to determine the probabilities of different outcomes when measuring a physical system. Its fundamental nature has been the subject of discussions since the inception of quantum theory: is it ontic, that is, does it correspond to a real property of the physical system? Or is it epistemic, that is, does it merely represent our knowledge about the system? Assuming a natural continuity assumption and a weak separability assumption, we show here that epistemic interpretations of the quantum state are in contradiction with quantum theory. Our argument is different from the recent proof of Pusey, Barrett, and Rudolph and it already yields a non-trivial constraint on \psi-epistemic models using a single copy of the system in question.Comment: Version 1 contains both theory and an illustrative experiment. Version 2 contains only the theory (the experiment with expanded discussion will be posted separatly at a later date). The main novelty of Version 2 is a detailed comparison in appendix 2 with L. Hardy arXiv:1205.14396. Version 2 is 6 pages of text and 1 figure; v3: minor change