Spontaneous rupture of giant gastric stromal tumor into gastric lumen

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) constitute a large majority of mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, which express the c-kit proto-oncogene protein, a cell membrane receptor with tyrosine kinase activity. GI stromal tumors of the stomach are usually associated with bleeding, abdominal pain or a palpable mass. CASE PRESENTATION: A 75-year-old male presented with upper abdominal pain and palpable mass. Computed tomographic (CT) scan of the abdomen showed a large mass arising in the posterior aspect of fundus, body, and greater curvature of the stomach. Second day after the admission, there was significant reduction in the size of the tumor, clinically as well as radiologically. Endoscopic biopsy showed large bulge in fundus and corpus of the stomach posteriorly with an opening in the posterior part of the corpus, and biopsy from the edge of the opening reveled GIST. Patient underwent curative resection. CONCLUSION: Spontaneous ruptured of giant gastric stromal tumor is very rare presentation of stomach GIST. Thorough clinical examination and timely investigation can diagnose rare complication

A meta-analysis for the effect of prophylactic GTN on the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis and on the successful rate of cannulation of bile ducts

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) has been shown to be able to relax the sphincter of Oddi (SO) both in animals and humans. Theoretically, the use of these compounds during and after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatgraphy (ERCP) could relax the biliary and pancreatic sphincters, facilitating cannulation of common bile duct (CBD) during the procedure, or minimizing potential pancreatic outflow obstruction after the procedure. However, clinical trials evaluating the protective effect of GTN on the post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatgraphy pancreatitis (PEP) have yielded inconclusive results. This meta-analysis is to systematically assess the effect of prophylactic administration of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) on the prevention of PEP and the effect on the cannulation of bile ducts.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>By searching PubMed (1966 to September 2009), CENTRAL (Cochrane Controlled trials Register; issue 3, 2009) and EMBASE.com (1984 to September 2009), two independent reviewers systematically identified prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) detecting the effect of prophylactic GTN on the incidence of PEP and on the cannulation of bile ducts. A meta-analysis of these clinical trials was then performed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>There are 55/899(6.1%) patients suffering PEP in the treatment group versus 95/915(10.4%) patients in the placebo group. The overall pooled risk of PEP was significantly lower in the GTN group than in the placebo group (OR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.40 to 0.79, p = 0.001). Subgroup analyses suggested that GTN administered by the sublingual form (OR 0.34,95% CI:0.16 to 0.75, p = 0.007) is more effective than transdermal route(OR 0.64,95% CI:0.40 to 1.01, p = 0.05), and the protective effect of GTN was far more obvious in the centers with high incidence of PEP (OR 0.40, 95% CI:0.24 to 0.67, p = 0.0006) than those centers with a low incidence of PEP (OR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.47 to 1.20, p = 0.22). Additionally, the meta-analysis suggests that GTN was not helpful for the cannulation of bile ducts.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>We concluded that prophylactic administration of GTN may significantly reduce the incidence of PEP and not be helpful for the cannulation of bile ducts.</p

PRE-SCREENING TPMT STATUS OF LIVER TRANSPLANT PATIENTS FOR AZATHIOPRINE THERAPY–A SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE FROM SOUTH INDIA

Objective: To assess azathioprine-induced bone marrow toxicity and its correlation with thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) mutation in liver transplant patients who develop myelosuppression while on azathioprine therapy.Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted from 1st September 2014 to 30thJune 2015 on 60 liver transplant patients who were tested for TPMT allele activity prior to receiving azathioprine. Haemoglobin levels, platelet counts and white blood cell counts of the patients were monitored for the occurrence of myelotoxicity. Patients who underwent liver transplant during the retrospective period from 1st September 2011 to 31st August 2014 and who developed myelosuppression while on azathioprine therapy were also tested for TPMT genotype.Results: A total of 76 liver transplant patients were tested for TPMT mutation. Prevalence of TPMT mutation in the study patients was 3.95%. The heterozygous TPMT*1/*3C genotype was traced in 2.63% of the patients while 1.32% of patients were homozygous for TPMT*3C allele. Interestingly 43.4% of patients with wild allele also showed azathioprine-induced myelosuppression. Azathioprine dose of 100 mg showed a higher degree of myelotoxicity than lower doses. Haematological indices of 42.1% of patients normalised on cessation of azathioprine therapy.Conclusion: Myelosuppression following the introduction of azathioprine was observed in patients with both ‘mutant' and ‘wild-type' alleles. Therefore a cautious approach has to be taken in pre-screening liver transplant recipients for TPMT allele determination in our population. The absence of TPMT mutation does not ensure freedom from myelosuppression. Hence regular monitoring of haematological indices of such patients receiving thiopurine therapy should be continued