Clinical Outcomes With Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib in a Clinical Trial Versus Real-World Standard of Care in Patients With BRAF-Mutated Advanced NSCLC

INTRODUCTION: BRAF mutations are rare in patients with NSCLC, and treatment options are limited. Dabrafenib plus trametinib (dab-tram) was approved for BRAF(V600)-mutated advanced NSCLC (aNSCLC), based on results from a phase 2 study (NCT01336634). This retrospective analysis compared the effectiveness of dab-tram, based on previously reported clinical trial data, versus real-world standard of care in patients with BRAF-mutated aNSCLC. METHODS: Real-world cohorts were derived from a deidentified real-world database (2011–2020) and included patients with BRAF-mutated aNSCLC receiving first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC), first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus PBC, or second-line ICIs. Weighting by odds was used to estimate the average treatment effect of the treated. RESULTS: For first-line dab-tram versus PBC, the hazard ratio (HR; 95% confidence interval) for death in unweighted and weighted analyses was 0.65 (0.39–1.1) and 0.51 (0.29–0.92; p = 0.03), respectively; unweighted and weighted median overall survival was 17.3 (12.3–40.2) versus 14.5 (9.2–19.6) months and 17.3 (14.6-not reached) versus 9.7 (6.4–19.6) months, respectively. Hazard ratio of death in unweighted and weighted analyses was 0.56 (0.29–1.1) and 0.57 (0.28–1.17), respectively, with first-line dab-tram versus PBC plus ICI, and 0.65 (0.39–1.07) and not reported (Cox proportional-hazards assumption violated), respectively, with second-line dab-tram versus ICI. CONCLUSIONS: In this indirect comparison in patients with BRAF-mutated aNSCLC, the risk of death was lower and median overall survival was longer with first-line dab-tram versus PBC. In analyses of dab-tram versus first-line PBC plus ICI or second-line ICI, sample sizes were small and findings were inconclusive with overlapping confidence intervals. Despite some limitations, the study provides useful data for this rare patient population

Correlations of EGFR mutations and increases in EGFR and HER2 copy number to gefitinib response in a retrospective analysis of lung cancer patients

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gefitinib, a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (<it>EGFR</it>), has shown limited efficacy in the treatment of lung cancer. Recognized clinical predictors of response to this drug, specifically female, non-smoker, Asian descent, and adenocarcinoma, together suggest a genetic basis for drug response. Recent studies have addressed the relationship between response and either sequence mutations or increased copy number of specific receptor tyrosine kinases. We set out to examine the relationship between response and the molecular status of two such kinases, <it>EGFR </it>and <it>HER2</it>, in 39 patients treated with gefitinib at the BC Cancer Agency.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Archival patient material was reviewed by a pathologist and malignant cells were selectively isolated by laser microdissection or manual recovery of cells from microscope slides. Genomic DNA was extracted from 37 such patient samples and exons 18–24, coding for the tyrosine kinase domain of <it>EGFR</it>, were amplified by PCR and sequenced. <it>EGFR </it>and <it>HER2 </it>copy number status were also assessed using FISH in 26 samples. Correlations between molecular features and drug response were assessed using the two-sided Fisher's exact test.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Mutations previously correlated with response were detected in five tumours, four with exon 19 deletions and one with an exon 21 missense L858R point mutation. Increased gene copy number was observed in thirteen tumours, seven with <it>EGFR </it>amplification, three with <it>HER2 </it>amplification, and three with amplification of both genes. In our study cohort, a correlation was not observed between response and <it>EGFR </it>mutations (exon 19 deletion p = 0.0889, we observed a single exon 21 mutation in a non-responder) or increases in <it>EGFR </it>or <it>HER2 </it>copy number (p = 0.552 and 0.437, respectively).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Neither mutation of <it>EGFR </it>nor increased copy number of <it>EGFR </it>or <it>HER2 </it>was diagnostic of response to gefitinib in this cohort. However, validation of these features in a larger sample set is appropriate. Identification of additional predictive biomarkers beyond <it>EGFR </it>status may be necessary to accurately predict treatment outcome.</p

An Evolving Algorithm to Select and Sequence Therapies in EGFR Mutation-positive NSCLC: A Strategic Approach.

The optimal treatment sequence for patients with metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive (EGFR-M+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) continues to evolve, related largely to an increasing number of breakthroughs and studies in the field. The efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of these patients is well established; however, the treatment decision-making process is becoming more complex as our knowledge of EGFR mutations and resistance pathways grows and more treatment options become available. Thus, treating physicians must consider an increasing number of factors. We present a stepwise approach to personalizing the treatment of patients with EGFR-M+ NSCLC, emphasizing some of the real world challenges faced by treating physicians. We reviewed the decision criteria for selecting the best first-line therapy, highlighted the importance of repeat biopsy on disease progression to determine the most appropriate next-line therapy, and discussed the options for third-line therapy and beyond. We also present an algorithm designed to optimize the sequencing strategies for prolonging survival and maintaining quality of life in our patients with EGFR-M+ NSCLC

Afatinib in Advanced Pretreated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer—A Canadian Experience

Background: Afatinib, an irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR TKI), is approved for first-line therapy in advanced EGFR mutation–positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and has previously demonstrated activity after failure of chemotherapy and reversible EGFR TKI, with improved response and progression-free survival, compared with placebo. Outcomes in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC receiving afatinib through a Canadian special access program (sap) are reported here. Methods: Patients with NSCLC progressing after at least 1 line of chemotherapy and an EGFR TKI were eligible to enrol in the sap. Characteristics of patients from the two largest accruing Canadian centres were retrospectively reviewed, including demographics, disease and treatment data, and patient outcomes. Results: The 53 patients who received afatinib (57% women, 51% never-smokers, 26% of East Asian ethnicity, and 66% with adenocarcinoma) had a median age of 59 years. EGFR mutations were documented in 25%, and EGFR wildtype in 8%. All patients had received prior EGFR TKI treatment, with 42% achieving a response. Patients took afatinib for a median of 2 months (range: 0–26 months); 17% required 1 or more dose reductions. Of 47 evaluable patients receiving afatinib, 10 experienced tumour shrinkage, and 11, stable disease. Median survival from afatinib initiation was 5 months (95% confidence interval: 2 months to 8 months). Grade 3 or greater diarrhea, rash, paronychia, and stomatitis were seen in 9%, 11%, 6%, and 4% of patients respectively. Conclusions: In an unselected population of pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC after TKI failure, median survival with afatinib therapy was 5 months. Through a sap, afatinib demonstrated activity in clinical practice, with manageable toxicity