Chest radiography practice in critically ill patients: a postal survey in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND: To ascertain current chest radiography practice in intensive care units (ICUs) in the Netherlands. METHODS: Postal survey: a questionnaire was sent to all ICUs with > 5 beds suitable for mechanical ventilation; pediatric ICUs were excluded. When an ICU performed daily-routine chest radiographs in any group of patients it was considered to be a "daily-routine chest radiography" ICU. RESULTS: From the number of ICUs responding, 63% practice a daily-routine strategy, in which chest radiographs are obtained on a daily basis without any specific reason. A daily-routine chest radiography strategy is practiced less frequently in university-affiliated ICUs (50%) as compared to other ICUs (68%), as well as in larger ICUs (> 20 beds, 50%) as compared to smaller ICUs (< 20 beds, 65%) (P > 0.05). Remarkably, physicians that practice a daily-routine strategy consider daily-routine radiographs helpful in guiding daily practice in less than 30% of all performed radiographs. Chest radiographs are considered essential for verification of the position of invasive devices (81%) and for diagnosing pneumothorax, pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome (82%, 74% and 69%, respectively). On demand chest radiographs are obtained after introduction of thoracic drains, central venous lines and endotracheal tubes in 98%, 84% and 75% of responding ICUs, respectively. Chest films are also obtained in case of ventilatory deterioration (49% of responding ICUs), and after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (59%), tracheotomy (58%) and mini-tracheotomy (23%). CONCLUSION: There is notable lack of consensus on chest radiography practice in the Netherlands. This survey suggests that a large number of intensivists may doubt the value of daily-routine chest radiography, but still practice a daily-routine strategy

K+ channel openers restore verapamil-inhibited lung fluid resolution and transepithelial ion transport

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Lung epithelial Na⁺channels (ENaC) are regulated by cell Ca²⁺signal, which may contribute to calcium antagonist-induced noncardiogenic lung edema. Although K⁺channel modulators regulate ENaC activity in normal lungs, the therapeutical relevance and the underlying mechanisms have not been completely explored. We hypothesized that K⁺channel openers may restore calcium channel blocker-inhibited alveolar fluid clearance (AFC) by up-regulating both apical and basolateral ion transport.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Verapamil-induced depression of heterologously expressed human αβγ ENaC in <it>Xenopus </it>oocytes, apical and basolateral ion transport in monolayers of human lung epithelial cells (H441), and <it>in vivo </it>alveolar fluid clearance were measured, respectively, using the two-electrode voltage clamp, Ussing chamber, and BSA protein assays. Ca²⁺signal in H441 cells was analyzed using Fluo 4AM.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The rate of <it>in vivo </it>AFC was reduced significantly (40.6 ± 6.3% of control, <it>P </it>< 0.05, n = 12) in mice intratracheally administrated verapamil. K_Ca3.1(1-EBIO) and K_ATP(minoxidil) channel openers significantly recovered AFC. In addition to short-circuit current (Isc) in intact H441 monolayers, both apical and basolateral Isc levels were reduced by verapamil in permeabilized monolayers. Moreover, verapamil significantly altered Ca²⁺signal evoked by ionomycin in H441 cells. Depletion of cytosolic Ca²⁺in αβγ ENaC-expressing oocytes completely abolished verapamil-induced inhibition. Intriguingly, K_V(pyrithione-Na), K _Ca3.1(1-EBIO), and K_ATP(minoxidil) channel openers almost completely restored the verapamil-induced decrease in Isc levels by diversely up-regulating apical and basolateral Na⁺and K⁺transport pathways.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our observations demonstrate that K⁺channel openers are capable of rescuing reduced vectorial Na⁺transport across lung epithelial cells with impaired Ca²⁺signal.</p

Image perception and interpretation of abnormalities; can we believe our eyes? Can we do something about it?

The radiologist’s visual impression of images is transmitted, via non-visual means (the report), to the clinician. There are several complex steps from the perception of the images by the radiologist to the understanding of the impression by the clinician. With a process as complex as this, it is no wonder that errors in perception, cognition, interpretation, transmission and understanding are very common. This paper reviews the processes of perception and error generation and possible strategies for minimising them