22 research outputs found
The Global Dominance of European Competition Law Over American Antitrust Law
The worldâs biggest consumer markets â the European Union and the United States â have adopted different approaches to regulating competition. This has not only put the EU and US at odds in high-profile investigations of anticompetitive conduct, but also made them race to spread their regulatory models. Using a novel dataset of competition statutes, we investigate this race to influence the worldâs regulatory landscape and find that the EUâs competition laws have been more widely emulated than the USâs competition laws. We then argue that both âpushâ and âpullâ factors explain the appeal of the EUâs competition regime: the EU actively promotes its model through preferential trade agreements and has an administrative template that is easy to emulate. As EU and US regulators offer competing regulatory models in domains as diverse as privacy, finance, and environmental protection, our study sheds light on how global regulatory races are fought and won
International Financial Governance, the EU, and Brexit: The âAgencificationâ of EU Financial Governance and the Implications
Discussion of 'The Revolving Door and the SEC's Enforcement Outcomes: Initial Evidence from Civil Litigation' by Dehaan, Kedia, Koh, and Rajgopal (2015)
Reshaping order execution in the EU and the role of interest groups under MiFID II
The controversial and long-awaited Commission Proposals to revise the cornerstone Markets in Financial Instruments Directive 2004 (MiFID I) were presented in October 2011. The Proposals are currently going through the Council and Parliament negotiation process, and final agreement is expected sometime in 2013. This article places these important reforms (together, MiFID II) in context by examining the impact of MiFID I since its application to EU financial markets in November 2007, and by considering what MiFID I's impact suggests for the design of MiFID II. It considers how MiFID I reshaped the EU share trading marketplace and how the dominant interests which shaped MiFID I's regulatory design fared. It also examines how those interest groups are seeking to shape MiFID II, and the implications. It suggests that the influence of interest groups may have led to overly ambitious MiFID II Proposals which are excessively concerned with investment firm and trading platform interests, and not sufficiently focused on the overall efficiency and effectiveness of EU share trading markets. It calls for a more modest approach to reform, based on fine-tuning MiFID I