A new approach to assessing the health benefit from obesity interventions in children and adolescents: the assessing cost-effectiveness in obesity project

OBJECTIVE: To report on a new modelling approach developed for the assessing cost-effectiveness in obesity (ACE-Obesity) project and the likely population health benefit and strength of evidence for 13 potential obesity prevention interventions in children and adolescents in Australia. METHODS: We used the best available evidence, including evidence from non-traditional epidemiological study designs, to determine the health benefits as body mass index (BMI) units saved and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) saved. We developed new methods to model the impact of behaviours on BMI post-intervention where this was not measured and the impacts on DALYs over the child\u27s lifetime (on the assumption that changes in BMI were maintained into adulthood). A working group of stakeholders provided input into decisions on the selection of interventions, the assumptions for modelling and the strength of the evidence. RESULTS: The likely health benefit varied considerably, as did the strength of the evidence from which that health benefit was calculated. The greatest health benefit is likely to be achieved by the \u27Reduction of TV advertising of high fat and/or high sugar foods and drinks to children\u27, \u27Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding\u27 and the \u27multi-faceted school-based programme with an active physical education component\u27 interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The use of consistent methods and common health outcome measures enables valid comparison of the potential impact of interventions, but comparisons must take into account the strength of the evidence used. Other considerations, including cost-effectiveness and acceptability to stakeholders, will be presented in future ACE-Obesity papers. Information gaps identified include the need for new and more effective initiatives for the prevention of overweight and obesity and for better evaluations of public health interventions

Band slippage after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding Etiology and treatment

Abstract Background: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is a safe and effective procedure for the management of morbid obesity. However, band slippage is a common complication with variable presentation that can be rectified by a second laparoscopic procedure. Methods: We studied case series of 125 consecutive patients who suffered from band slippage between November 1996 and May 2001 from a group of 1,480 laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding procedures performed during this time. The decision of whether to remove or replace/reposition the band was made prior to the operation, although the specific method used when replacement or repositioning was deemed suitable was determined by the operative findings. A laparoscopic approach was used in all but three patients. Results: A total of 125 patients (8.4%) suffered band slippage (posterior slippage, 82.4%; anterior slippage, 17.6%). In 70 patients (56%), the band was removed, whereas in 55 patients (44%) it was repositioned or replaced immediately. Of these 55 patients, six underwent later removal, five due to recurrent slippage and one due to erosion. Fourteen patients suffered complications, including gastric perforation (n = 8), intraoperative bleeding (n = 1), postoperative fever (n = 3), aspiration pneumonia (n = 1), upper gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 1), and pulmonary embolism (n = 1). Conclusion: Band slippage is not a rare complication after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. The decision to remove or replace the band or convert to another bariatric procedure should be made preoperatively, taking both patient preference and etiology into consideration. Short-term results indicate that band salvage is successful when the patient population is chosen correctly