Mid-term Results of Radiographic and Functional Outcomes After Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis with Bulk Femoral Head Allograft

Category: Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis with bulk femoral head allograft has previously been reported as a way to fill large osseous hindfoot deficits in order to restore limb length, but few studies have been performed evaluating outcomes and prognostic factors. The purposes of this study were to assess functional and radiographic outcomes after TTC arthrodesis with femoral head allograft and retrospectively identify prognostic factors. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing TTC arthrodesis with bulk femoral head allograft performed at an academic institution by a single fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeon between 2004 and 2015 was conducted. Patient charts and operative reports were reviewed for patient and procedural variables, respectively. Radiographic union was assessed at the ankle and subtalar joints by another fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeon not involved in any patient’s surgical care. Radiographic stability, defined as proper maintenance of hardware and graft positioning in the hindfoot, was also assessed. A procedure was “failed” if there was a need for revision surgery. Patients with a successful arthrodesis were contacted to score the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure-Active Daily Living (FAAM-ADL) questionnaire, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and Short Form-12 (SF-12) mental (MCS) and physical (PCS) components. 22 patients were identified, with average radiograph and functional follow-up times of 39.7 and 57.1 months, respectively. Results: Complete radiographic union of involved joints was achieved in 13 patients (59.1%) and in 72.7% (32/44) of all joints. Eighteen patients (81.8%) were assessed to be radiographically stable at final follow-up. Three patients (13.6%) underwent revision arthrodesis at a mean of 18.9 months postoperatively, and 19 patients (86.4%) did not require additional surgery as of final follow-up. At an average of 57.1 months postoperatively, patients significantly improved to a mean FAAM-ADL score of 71.5 from 36.3 (P<.001). The mean VAS for pain significantly improved from 76.8 to 32.9 (P<.001). The mean postoperative SF-12-MCS and SF- 12-PCS scores were 53.9 and 40.6. Additionally, 73.3% (11/15) reported being satisfied with their surgical outcomes. Male sex (P=.03) and a lateral operative approach (P=.03) both resulted in significantly worse outcomes. Conclusion: The utilization of a femoral head allograft with TTC arthrodesis in patients with large hindfoot defects is an acceptable method that can offer improved functional and sustained radiographic outcomes and patient satisfaction. Male sex and a lateral approach may be associated with an inferior prognosis

Incidence and Risk Factors for Complications of Exposed Kirschner Wires Following Elective Forefoot Surgery

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Kirschner wires (K-wires) are commonly utilized for temporary metatarsal and phalangeal fixation following forefoot corrective osteotomies. K-wires can remain in place for up to 6 weeks postoperatively and are at risk for wound complications. Their exposure to the outside environment and direct osseous communication makes infection an important concern for the clinician. Early removal, prophylactic antibiotics, and re-operation are potential sequelae of infected K-wires and can affect outcomes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the incidence of complications of exposed K-wires after forefoot surgery and identify patient or perioperative risk factors for these complications. Methods: A single surgeon retrospective chart review of forefoot surgeries over the past 10 years was undertaken. Inclusion criteria were any adult undergoing elective forefoot surgery with the use of exposed K-wires. Incidence of wound complication defined as cellulitis, pin site drainage, or migration/loosening of the pin requiring prophylactic antibiotics or early removal was noted. Patient demographic data such as age, BMI, comorbidities, and smoking status were recorded. Perioperative data such as tourniquet time, type of anesthesia, and perioperative antibiotics was also recorded. Univariate analysis was performed via Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables and Chi square test for categorical variables. Multivariate analysis was performed for statistically significant risk factors. Results: 1,217 Patients (2,018 K-wires) were analyzed. There was a 10% complication rate requiring prophylactic antibiotics or early removal (N=123). 40 patients required early pin removal, 54 patients were given oral antibiotics, and 29 patients required both. Female gender (p<0.001), BMI over 28 (p<0.001), general anesthesia (p=0.025), increased tourniquet time (p=0.003) and history of rheumatoid arthritis (p=0.047) were significantly associated with complications. Both male gender [OR 2.62] and tourniquet time [OR 1.01] remained significant on multivariate regression analysis. There was no increased risk of complications with a history of smoking or diabetes. Conclusion: The K-wire is an important modality for providing temporary immobilization of the smaller bones of the forefoot following deformity correction. Male gender, elevated BMI, history of rheumatoid arthritis, general anesthesia, and longer tourniquet time are associated with increased risk of pin infection requiring early removal and/or antibiotics. Further study is needed to determine whether optimizing inflammatory disease, using efficient perioperative technique, and utilizing local anesthesia may limit the risk of wound complications with K-wires in forefoot surgery

Value of Supine Positioning in Repair of Achilles Tendon Ruptures

Category: Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: The optimal method of Achilles tendon repair remains undefined. Few previous studies have quantified the financial expenses of Achilles tendon repairs in relation to functional outcomes in order to assess the overall value of the accepted repair techniques. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the value of supine positioning during open repair (OS) of acute Achilles tendon ruptures through the quantification of operative times, costs, and outcomes in comparison to the commonly performed percutaneous prone (PP) repair technique. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 67 patients undergoing OS and 67 patients undergoing PP primary Achilles tendon repair with two surgeons at four surgical locations. Total operating room usage times and operating times were collected from surgical site records. Total operating room times were used to estimate the costs of room usage and anesthesia, while costs of repair equipment were collected from the respective manufacturers. Patients undergoing OS repair completed the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) questionnaire, with activities of daily living (ADL) and sports subscales, Short Form-12 (SF-12), with mental (MCS) and physical (PCS) health subcategories, and the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain preoperatively and at final follow-up. Results: Even with a significantly longer mean surgical time (P=.035), OS repairs had a shorter duration of total operating room time when compared to that of PP repairs (58.4 versus 69.7 minutes, P<.001). Estimated time-dependent costs were lower in OS repairs ($739 versus$861 per procedure, P<.001), while the estimated average total per procedure cost was also lower for OS repairs ($801 versus$1,910 per procedure, P<.001). For patients undergoing OS repair, FAAM-ADL (P<.001), FAAM-Sports (P<.001), SF-12-PCS (P<.001) all increased and VAS grades (P<0.001) decreased from time of initial encounter to final follow-up and were comparable to reported outcomes in the current literature. The complication rate in OS repairs (6.0%) was lower than PP repairs (11.9%), with revisions only occurring in the latter technique. Conclusion: Performing open Achilles tendon repair in the supine position offers substantial value, or “health outcomes achieved per dollar spent”, to providers due to decreased total operating room times and costs with satisfactory functional outcomes

Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Category: Ankle, Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: Reports of ankle range of motion and how it affects patient outcomes following total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) have been mixed. Furthermore, recent studies have relied on clinical exam to obtain postoperative range of motion and have lacked preoperative functional scores. The purpose of our study was to analyze how preoperative range of motion and functional scores change with time following TAA using postoperative functional scores and radiographs for range of motion calculations. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on 107 patients (109 ankles) that had undergone fixed-bearing implant TAA by a single surgeon between 2010 and 2015. Preoperative range of motion was gathered clinically in office by the senior author. Postoperative range of motion through the ankle joint was evaluated with dedicated weight-bearing maximum dorsiflexion and plantarflexion lateral radiographs at 3 and 6 months, 1 and 2 years. The range of motion was measured using the angle measurement tool on the picture archiving and communication system. Patients completed visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) questionnaire subcategorized into activities of daily (ADL) and sports subscale preoperatively and at postoperative intervals of 3 and 6 months, 1 and 2 years. The mean age was 65 years (range, 31-83 years). Mean BMI was 28.1 (range, 14.9-44.9). There were 53 males (50%). Results: The mean total arc of ankle motion preoperatively was 20.7 degrees and improved significantly to 28.3, 34.3, 33.3, and 33.3 degrees at 3 and 6 months, 1 and 2 years, respectively (P<0.001) (Figure 1). Mean VAS pain and mean FAAM ADL preoperative scores improved significantly at each postoperative time point as seen in Figure 1 (P<0.001). Increased ankle range of motion was correlated with lower VAS preoperatively (r=-0.38, P=0.007), and at 1 year (r=-0.36, P<0.001), and 2 years (r=-0.2, P=0.033) postoperatively. Increased ankle range of motion was significantly correlated with higher FAAM-ADL at 3 months (r=0.48, P=0.012), 1 year (r=0.24, P<0.034), and 2 years (r=0.37, P<0.001) postoperatively. Conclusion: Patients undergoing fixed-bearing TAA had continued and sustained improvement from preoperative total arc of motion, pain, and function at each postoperative visit, up to 2 years. Ankle range of motion was noted to peak at 6 months, while pain and FAAM-ADL continued to improve up to 2 years postoperatively. Patients with greater ankle range of motion correlated with less pain and improved function at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Though pain and function may continue to improve even as far out as 2 years postoperatively, it is not likely that range of motion will continue to increase

Self-Reported Pain Tolerance and Opioid Pain Medication Use after Foot and Ankle Surgery

Category: Pain Management Introduction/Purpose: The opioid epidemic in the United States continues to take lives. As one of the top prescribing groups, orthopaedic surgeons must tailor post-surgical pain control to minimize the potential for harm from prescription opioid use. Patients often reference their own pain threshold as a benchmark for how they will tolerate the pain of surgery, but current literature suggests that there is not a significant correlation between an individual’s perceived pain threshold and their actual threshold for heat stimulus. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a correlation between a patient’s self- reported pain tolerance and their actual prescription narcotic medication usage after foot and ankle surgery. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of adult patients that underwent outpatient foot and ankle surgeries performed by 5 fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeons at a large, multispecialty orthopaedic practice over a one year period. Demographic data, procedural details and anesthesia type were collected. Narcotic usage data including number of pills dispensed and pill counts performed at the first postoperative visit were obtained. Patients were contacted via email or telephone between 7-19 months postoperatively, and asked to respond to the validated statement “Pain doesn’t bother me as much as it does most people” by choosing “strongly disagree”, “disagree”, “neither”, “agree” or “strongly agree”. Patients scored their pain threshold on a scale of 1- 100 with 0 being “pain intolerant” and 100 a ”high pain threshold" and ranked their expectations of the pain after surgery and satisfaction with pain management on respective five-point Likert scales. Data was analyzed using a Spearman’s correlation. Results: Of the 486 patients who completed surveys, average age was 51.24 years, 32.1% were male and 7.82% current smokers. After controlling for age and anesthesia type, both agreement with the validated statement and higher pain tolerance score had a weak negative correlation with pills taken (r=-0.13, p=0.004 and r=-0.14, p=0.002, respectively); patients with higher perceived pain thresholds took fewer opioid pills after surgery (Table 1). Correlation between high expectations of postoperative pain and pills taken was weakly negative (r=-0.28, p=<0.001) (Table 1). Patients who found surgery more painful than they expected took less pain medication. There was a small, positive correlation between pain tolerance and satisfaction with pain management (r=0.12, p=0.008), indicating that patients with a relatively high pain tolerance had more satisfaction (Table 1). Conclusion: Assessment of both subjective description and quantitative score of a patient’s pain threshold prior to surgery may assist the surgeon in tailoring postoperative pain control regimens. Unexpectedly, patients who found surgery less painful than expected actually took a greater number of opioid pills. This may highlight an educational opportunity regarding postoperative pain management in order to reduce narcotic requirement. Setting expectations on safe utilization of prescribed pain medications may also increase satisfaction. This study provides useful information for surgeons to customize pain management regimens and to perform effective preoperative education and counseling regarding postoperative pain management. Table 1. Correlation Between Pain Threshold Assessment, Expectation of Postoperative Pain and Satisfaction with Postoperative Pain Management and Opioid Medication Taken Spearman Correlation Coefficient p-value Agreement with statement “pain doesn’t bother me as much as it does most people” and opioid intake -0.13 0.004 Increasing quantitative pain threshold score and opioid intake -0.14 0.002 Assessment of postoperative pain as more painful than expected and opioid intake -0.28 <0.001 Increasing satisfaction with postoperative pain management and opioid intake 0.12 0.00