6,862 research outputs found
Lifting from the Deep: Convolutional 3D Pose Estimation from a Single Image
We propose a unified formulation for the problem of 3D human pose estimation
from a single raw RGB image that reasons jointly about 2D joint estimation and
3D pose reconstruction to improve both tasks. We take an integrated approach
that fuses probabilistic knowledge of 3D human pose with a multi-stage CNN
architecture and uses the knowledge of plausible 3D landmark locations to
refine the search for better 2D locations. The entire process is trained
end-to-end, is extremely efficient and obtains state- of-the-art results on
Human3.6M outperforming previous approaches both on 2D and 3D errors.Comment: Paper presented at CVPR 1
Explaining Classifiers using Adversarial Perturbations on the Perceptual Ball
We present a simple regularization of adversarial perturbations based upon
the perceptual loss. While the resulting perturbations remain imperceptible to
the human eye, they differ from existing adversarial perturbations in that they
are semi-sparse alterations that highlight objects and regions of interest
while leaving the background unaltered. As a semantically meaningful adverse
perturbations, it forms a bridge between counterfactual explanations and
adversarial perturbations in the space of images. We evaluate our approach on
several standard explainability benchmarks, namely, weak localization,
insertion deletion, and the pointing game demonstrating that perceptually
regularized counterfactuals are an effective explanation for image-based
classifiers.Comment: CVPR 202
Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR
There has been much discussion of the right to explanation in the EU General
Data Protection Regulation, and its existence, merits, and disadvantages.
Implementing a right to explanation that opens the black box of algorithmic
decision-making faces major legal and technical barriers. Explaining the
functionality of complex algorithmic decision-making systems and their
rationale in specific cases is a technically challenging problem. Some
explanations may offer little meaningful information to data subjects, raising
questions around their value. Explanations of automated decisions need not
hinge on the general public understanding how algorithmic systems function.
Even though such interpretability is of great importance and should be pursued,
explanations can, in principle, be offered without opening the black box.
Looking at explanations as a means to help a data subject act rather than
merely understand, one could gauge the scope and content of explanations
according to the specific goal or action they are intended to support. From the
perspective of individuals affected by automated decision-making, we propose
three aims for explanations: (1) to inform and help the individual understand
why a particular decision was reached, (2) to provide grounds to contest the
decision if the outcome is undesired, and (3) to understand what would need to
change in order to receive a desired result in the future, based on the current
decision-making model. We assess how each of these goals finds support in the
GDPR. We suggest data controllers should offer a particular type of
explanation, unconditional counterfactual explanations, to support these three
aims. These counterfactual explanations describe the smallest change to the
world that can be made to obtain a desirable outcome, or to arrive at the
closest possible world, without needing to explain the internal logic of the
system
Worst-case Optimal Submodular Extensions for Marginal Estimation
Submodular extensions of an energy function can be used to efficiently
compute approximate marginals via variational inference. The accuracy of the
marginals depends crucially on the quality of the submodular extension. To
identify the best possible extension, we show an equivalence between the
submodular extensions of the energy and the objective functions of linear
programming (LP) relaxations for the corresponding MAP estimation problem. This
allows us to (i) establish the worst-case optimality of the submodular
extension for Potts model used in the literature; (ii) identify the worst-case
optimal submodular extension for the more general class of metric labeling; and
(iii) efficiently compute the marginals for the widely used dense CRF model
with the help of a recently proposed Gaussian filtering method. Using synthetic
and real data, we show that our approach provides comparable upper bounds on
the log-partition function to those obtained using tree-reweighted message
passing (TRW) in cases where the latter is computationally feasible.
Importantly, unlike TRW, our approach provides the first practical algorithm to
compute an upper bound on the dense CRF model.Comment: Accepted to AISTATS 201
Restorative justice application to Western Alaska bootleggers
Master's Project (M.A.) University of Alaska Fairbanks, 201
- β¦