Time to Relapse and the Patterns of Relapse Are Prognostic for Post-Relapse Survival after CD34+-Selected Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT), defined by its underlying graft-versus-multiple myeloma (MM) effect, is a potentially curative approach for high-risk pts. However, relapse remains the main cause of treatment failure. Predictors for post-relapse survival after HCT are not well characterized, and we hypothesized that the time to relapse and the patterns of relapse are prognostic for post-relapse survival. Methods: All pts with MM who underwent a CD34+-selected alloHCT at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center on protocol (NCT 01131169/01119066) or off study from 01/2010 to 12/2017 and progressed after alloHCT were included. Pts were conditioned with busulfan (0.8 mg/kg x 10), melphalan (70 mg/m2 × 2), and fludarabine (25mg/m2 × 5). The K-M method was used to estimate OS post-HCT relapse. Significant predictors were considered in a Cox model. Results: Of the 115 transplanted pts, 60 (52%) relapsed and were analyzed. The median age was 56 yrs (35- 66), 62% male and 82% with high-risk cytogenetics (CG). KPS was ≥ 80 in 100% and ≥ 90 in 52%. Pts received a median of 4 lines of therapy pre-HCT (1-10), with 88% achieving at least a partial response (PR) prior to alloHCT. All pts had received at least one autoHCT. Of the 38% who received a planned or preemptive post-HCT therapy, 13 received DLI and 10 other strategies. Relapse was characterized as very early (24 mo, 22%). At relapse, 27% presented with extramedullary disease (EMD). Median post-relapse OS was significantly different for pts who relapsed very early, early, or late; 4 mo, 17 mo, and 72 mo, respectively (p = 0.002). Age ≥55, relapse with EMD, lower KPS, <PR prior to HCT, <PR by day 100, and no maintenance were also prognostic for worse post-relapse OS in univariate analysis. There was no significant difference for post-relapse OS for number of lines, high-risk CG, or era of alloHCT. In multivariate analysis adjusting for sex and age, risk factors for worse post-relapse OS included very early (HR 4.4, 95%CI 1.4-13.5) or early relapse (HR 2.5, 95%CI 1.4-13.5), relapse with EMD (HR 5.2, 95%CI 2.1-12.9), and lack of DLI as planned post-HCT therapy (HR for DLI compared with no DLI = 0.11, 95%CI 0.01-0.9). Conclusion: For this very high-risk group of MM pts, differences in time to relapse after alloHCT define very distinct post-relapse survival patterns. Very early relapses were associated with greater chemoresistance and dismal prognosis. In contrast, the median post-relapse OS for late relapses was 6 yrs, suggesting different underlying disease biology and/or host/donor characteristics. Similar to the post-auto setting, relapse with EMD conferred poor prognosis. Of note, post-relapse OS was superior for pts who received a DLI as planned post-HCT therapy prior to relapse. Efforts to characterize optimal post-relapse therapeutic strategies and mechanism(s) driving relapses are ongoing

Prognostic Factors for Postrelapse Survival after ex Vivo CD34+-Selected (T Cell-Depleted) Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

•Time to relapse after T cell-depleted hematopoietic cell transplantation defines distinct postrelapse outcomes.•Relapse with extramedullary disease is common and associated with dismal prognosis.•Donor lymphocyte infusion for relapse prevention improves postrelapse survival. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) for multiple myeloma (MM), with its underlying graft-versus-tumor capacity, is a potentially curative approach for high-risk patients. Relapse is the main cause of treatment failure, but predictors for postrelapse survival are not well characterized. We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate predictors for postrelapse overall survival (OS) in 60 MM patients who progressed after myeloablative T cell-depleted alloHCT. The median patient age was 56 years, and 82% had high-risk cytogenetics. Patients received a median of 4 lines of therapy pre-HCT, and 88% achieved at least a partial response (PR) before alloHCT. Of the 38% who received preemptive post-HCT therapy, 13 received donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) and 10 received other interventions. Relapse was defined as very early (24 months; 22%). At relapse, 27% presented with extramedullary disease (EMD). The median postrelapse overall survival (OS) by time to relapse was 4 months for the very early relapse group, 17 months for the early relapse group, and 72 months for the late relapse group (P = .002). Older age, relapse with EMD, <PR before alloHCT, <PR by day +100, and no maintenance were prognostic for inferior postrelapse OS on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis adjusted for age and sex, very early relapse (hazard ratio [HR], 4.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42 to 13.5), relapse with EMD (HR, 5.20; 95% CI, 2.10 to 12.9), and DLI for relapse prevention (HR, .11; 95% CI, 2.10 to 12.9) were significant predictors for postrelapse survival. Despite their shared inherent high-risk status, patients with MM have significantly disparate post-HCT relapse courses, with some demonstrating long-term survival despite relapse