Success of Endoscopic Pharyngoesophageal Dilation after Head and Neck Cancer Treatment

To assess clinical success and safety of endoscopic pharyngoesophageal dilation after chemoradiation or radiation for head and neck cancer and to identify variables associated with dilation failure

Everolimus in Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer: A Case Series

Background: Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is a very aggressive disease and accounts for over 50% of thyroid-cancer related deaths. mTOR inhibition has shown anti-tumor activity in ATC. We report our experience treating patients with ATC with everolimus off-protocol.Methods: Patients with confirmed ATC and treated with everolimus at DFCI were identified and reviewed retrospectively. NexGen sequencing was performed, and radiologic responses were correlated with mutational profile.Results: Five patients were treated from 2013 to 2016. Three patients had a response, which included one patient who achieved a partial response for 27.9 months, and two patients who had stable disease for 3.7 and 5.9 months, respectively. Genomic analysis was available in two patients and revealed that the partial responder had mutations involving the PI3K/mTOR pathway.Conclusion: Everolimus has anti-tumor activity in ATC, and responses may correlate with mutations involving the PI3K/mTOR pathway. Further studies are warranted

Experimental evaluation of the accuracy of skin dose calculation for a

commercial treatment planning syste

Clinical experience of the importance of daily portal imaging for head

and neck IMRT treatment

Effect of dental restorations and prostheses on radiotherapy dose distribution: a Monte Carlo study

Dental restorations, fixed prosthodontics, and implants affect dose distribution in head and neck radiation therapy due to the high atomic number of the materials utilized. The backscatter of electrons from metallic materials due to the impinging treatment x‐ray results in localized dose enhancements. These dose enhancements cause localized mucositis in patients who have dental work, a significant clinical complication. We investigated the backscatter effect of 23 configurations of dental work using the EGS4nrc Monte Carlo (MC) simulation system. We found that all‐metal fixed partial dentures caused the highest amount of dose enhancement – up to 33% – while amalgam restorations did not cause a significant amount. Restorations with a ceramic veneer caused up to 8% enhancement. Between 3 mm and 5 mm of water‐equivalent material almost completely absorbed the backscatter. MC simulations provide an accurate estimate of backscatter dose, and may provide patient‐specific estimates in future

Effects of definitive chemoradiation on circulating immunologic angiogenic cytokines in head and neck cancer patients

Background: Preclinical studies suggest a synergistic effect between radiation, immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy, although the mechanisms are unclear. Angiogenic cytokines are known to affect the immune system, and their levels may be associated with response to immunotherapy. Here, we assess changes in circulating VEGF, as well as angiogenic cytokines angiopoietin-1 and -2 (Ang1, Ang2), and placental growth factor (PLGF) that occur during definitive chemo-radiotherapy in HNSCC patients. Methods: We prospectively collected blood samples from patients receiving definitive radiation with or without chemotherapy. Serum Ang1, Ang2, VEGF, and PLGF were measured via cytokine assays. Results: The majority of patients had advanced stage, node positive HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer, and received radiation to a median dose of 70 Gy with concurrent cisplatin. Over the course of treatment, serum VEGF and Ang1 levels decreased in 20/24 (84 %, p < 0.0001) and 21/24 (88 %, p < 0.0001) patients, respectively, and Ang2 and PLGF levels increased in 20/24 (83 %, p < 0.0001) patients. Conclusions: We find significant changes in angiogenic cytokines in the majority of HNSCC patients over the course of chemoradiation. Decreases in VEGF caused by radiation may represent one mechanism of potential synergy with immunotherapy. Increases in Ang2 and PLGF are interesting given their link to tumor associated angiogenesis and poor prognosis. Additional studies are needed to explore synergies between anti-angiogenic treatments, immunotherapy, and chemoradiation in HNSCC. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40425-016-0138-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users

Head and Neck Cancer Clinical Research on ClinicalTrials.gov: An Opportunity for Radiation Oncologists

Purpose: Many improvements in head and neck cancer (HNC) outcomes are related to optimization of radiation therapy (RT) dose, fractionation, normal-tissue sparing, and technology. However, prior work has shown that the literature of randomized controlled trials is dominated by industry-sponsored trials that have lower rates of incorporating RT. We characterized HNC clinical trials, hypothesizing that RT-specific research questions may be relatively underrepresented among HNC randomized controlled trials. Methods and Materials: A web query of all open interventional trials on www.ClinicalTrials.gov was performed using search terms “head and neck cancer” and specific HNC subsites. Trial details were captured including the modality used, principal investigator (PI) specialty, funding, and whether the study tested a RT-modality specific hypothesis. Chi-square testing and logistic regression were used to compare groups. Results: There were 841 open HNC trials, including definitive (47.6%) and recurrent/metastatic (41.9%) populations. Most trials (71.7%) were phase I or nonrandomized phase II studies, rather than phase III or randomized phase II (28.3%). Among single-arm studies, most (79.6%) incorporated systemic therapy (ST), and fewer (25.2%) incorporated RT. Even fewer phase III and randomized phase II trials tested an RT-specific hypothesis (11.1%), compared with ST-related hypotheses (77.1%; P < .001); trials were more likely to test an RT-hypothesis if the study PI was a radiation oncologist (20.9% vs 6.0%; P < .001). Among RT trials, most early-phase studies tested novel modalities (eg, stereotactic body radiation therapy, proton therapy), whereas most later-phase studies tested dose and fractionation. RT-focused trials had low rates of federal (10.4%) or industry (2.6%) funding. Conclusions: RT-specific research hypotheses are a minority of phase II-III HNC trials, which mostly focus on incorporating ST in the definitive or recurrent/metastatic setting and have higher rates of industry funding. Radiation oncologist PI leadership and increased nonindustry funding access may ensure that RT-specific hypotheses are incorporated into trial design