Anemia management and chronic renal failure progression

Anemia management and chronic renal failure progression Analysis of the biologic effects of erythropoietin and pathophysiology of chronic kidney diseases (CKD) suggests that treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) could slow the progression of CKD. By decreasing hypoxia and oxidative stress, it could prevent the development of interstitial fibrosis and the destruction of tubular cells. It could have direct protective effects on tubular cells through its antiapoptotic properties. It could help maintain the integrity of the interstitial capillary network through its effects on endothelial cells. Thus, suggesting that correcting anemia with ESA could slow the progression of CKD is biologically plausible.In patients with CKD, three small prospective studies and a retrospective study have suggested that treatment with ESA may have protective effects. Post-hoc analysis of the Reduction in Endpoints in Noninsulin-dependent Diabetes Mellitus with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan study has also shown that anemia was an independent risk factor for progression of nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. In addition, a large clinical trial, which had to be stopped prematurely because of labeling change for subcutaneous administration of epoetin alfa, suggests that complete normalization of hemoglobin levels is safe in CKD patients not on dialysis and without severe cardiovascular disease. Thus, it seems reasonable to advocate starting a large randomized, prospective study to determine if normalization of hemoglobin concentration can effectively slow the progression of CKD

Development and Validation of a New Hierarchical Composite End Point for Clinical Trials of Kidney Disease Progression

BACKGROUND: The established composite kidney end point in clinical trials combines clinical events with sustained large changes in GFR. However, the statistical method does not weigh the relative clinical importance of the end point components. A HCE accounts for the clinical importance of the end point components and enables combining dichotomous outcomes with continuous measures. METHODS: We developed and validated a new HCE for kidney disease progression, performing post hoc analyses of seven major Phase 3 placebo-controlled trials that assessed the effects of canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, finerenone, atrasentan, losartan, irbesartan, and aliskiren in patients with CKD. We calculated the win odds (WOs) for treatment effects on a kidney HCE, defined as a hierarchical composite of all-cause mortality; kidney failure; sustained 57%, 50%, and 40% GFR declines from baseline; and GFR slope. The WO describes the odds of a more favorable outcome for receiving the active compared with the control. We compared the WO with the hazard ratio (HR) of the primary kidney outcome of the original trials. RESULTS: In all trials, treatment effects calculated with the WO reflected a similar direction and magnitude of the treatment effect compared with the HR. Clinical trials incorporating the HCE would achieve increased statistical power compared with the established composite end point at equivalent sample sizes. CONCLUSIONS: In seven major kidney clinical trials, the WO and HR provided similar direction of treatment effect estimates with smaller HRs associated with larger WOs. The prioritization of clinical outcomes and inclusion of broader composite end points makes the HCE an attractive alternative to the established kidney end point

LA TUBERCULOSE CHEZ LE PATIENT INSUFFISANT RENAL CHRONIQUE (ETUDE DE 39 CAS)

ST QUENTIN EN YVELINES-BU (782972101) / SudocPARIS-BIUM (751062103) / SudocSudocFranceF

Validity and Utility of a Hierarchical Composite End Point for Clinical Trials of Kidney Disease Progression:A Review

Clinical trials in nephrology often use composite end points comprising clinical events, such as onset of ESKD and initiation of kidney function replacement therapy, along with a sustained large (e.g., $50$50%. By contrast, hierarchical composite end points (HCEs) combine multiple outcomes and prioritize each patient’s most clinically relevant outcome for inclusion in analysis. In this review, we consider the use of HCEs in clinical trials of CKD progression, emphasizing the potential to combine dichotomous clinical events such as those typically used in CKD progression trials, with the continuous variable of GFR over time, while ranking all components according to clinical significance. We consider maraca plots to visualize overall treatment effects and the contributions of individual components, discuss the application of win odds in kidney HCE trials, and review general design considerations for clinical trials for CKD progression with kidney HCE as an efficacy end point.</p

Validity and Utility of a Hierarchical Composite End Point for Clinical Trials of Kidney Disease Progression:A Review

Clinical trials in nephrology often use composite end points comprising clinical events, such as onset of ESKD and initiation of kidney function replacement therapy, along with a sustained large (e.g., $50$50%. By contrast, hierarchical composite end points (HCEs) combine multiple outcomes and prioritize each patient’s most clinically relevant outcome for inclusion in analysis. In this review, we consider the use of HCEs in clinical trials of CKD progression, emphasizing the potential to combine dichotomous clinical events such as those typically used in CKD progression trials, with the continuous variable of GFR over time, while ranking all components according to clinical significance. We consider maraca plots to visualize overall treatment effects and the contributions of individual components, discuss the application of win odds in kidney HCE trials, and review general design considerations for clinical trials for CKD progression with kidney HCE as an efficacy end point.</p

Development and Validation of a New Hierarchical Composite End Point for Clinical Trials of Kidney Disease Progression

Background The established composite kidney end point in clinical trials combines clinical events with sustained large changes in GFR. However, the statistical method does not weigh the relative clinical importance of the end point components. A HCE accounts for the clinical importance of the end point components and enables combining dichotomous outcomes with continuous measures. Methods We developed and validated a new HCE for kidney disease progression, performing post hoc analyses of seven major Phase 3 placebo-controlled trials that assessed the effects of canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, finerenone, atrasentan, losartan, irbesartan, and aliskiren in patients with CKD. We calculated the win odds (WOs) for treatment effects on a kidney HCE, defined as a hierarchical composite of all-cause mortality; kidney failure; sustained 57%, 50%, and 40% GFR declines from baseline; and GFR slope. The WO describes the odds of a more favorable outcome for receiving the active compared with the control. We compared the WO with the hazard ratio (HR) of the primary kidney outcome of the original trials. Results In all trials, treatment effects calculated with the WO reflected a similar direction and magnitude of the treatment effect compared with the HR. Clinical trials incorporating the HCE would achieve increased statistical power compared with the established composite end point at equivalent sample sizes. Conclusions In seven major kidney clinical trials, the WO and HR provided similar direction of treatment effect estimates with smaller HRs associated with larger WOs. The prioritization of clinical outcomes and inclusion of broader composite end points makes the HCE an attractive alternative to the established kidney end point.</p