Endoscopic characterization of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps with and without dysplasia

Sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/Ps) are precursors of colorectal cancer (CRC), but their endoscopic detection can be difficult. We therefore examined the endoscopic characteristics of SSA/Ps with and without dysplasia in a cross-sectional study. We reviewed clinical, endoscopic, and histopathologic data from patients undergoing colonoscopy between February 2008 and February 2012. We categorized colorectal polyps according to anatomic site, size, and shape, and classified serrated polyps using the World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Multiple logistic regression analyses examined potential differences regarding site, size, and shape between SSA/Ps and colorectal adenomas (overall and advanced only). We examined 7433 patients (mean age 59 years, 45.9 % men) with 5968 colorectal polyps. In total, we found 170 SSA/Ps (170/5968, 2.9 %), including 63 SSA/Ps with dysplasia (1.1 %) and 107 SSA/Ps without dysplasia (1.8 %). Compared with SSA/Ps with dysplasia, SSA/Ps without dysplasia were more often proximally located (odds ratio [OR] 3.3, 95 % confidence interval [95 %CI] 1.7 - 6.4), but less often  < 6 mm in size (OR 0.6, 95 %CI 0.3 - 1.1). No significant differences were found regarding location between SSA/Ps with dysplasia and advanced adenomas (proximal colon, 47.6 % vs. 40.1 %). However, SSA/Ps with dysplasia were more often  < 6 mm in size than advanced adenomas (OR 0.3, 95 %CI 0.2 - 0.5). Of the 63 dysplastic SSA/Ps, 6 (9.5 %) contained high grade dysplasia, but none invasive carcinoma. SSA/Ps with dysplasia are frequently  < 6 mm in size, located throughout the colon and 9.5 % of them contain high grade dysplasia. These findings underscore the importance of high quality colonoscopic examination to maximize protection against CR

Metachronous neoplasms in patients with laterally spreading tumours during surveillance

BACKGROUND: Laterally spreading tumours represent a major challenge for endoscopic detection and resection. OBJECTIVE: To examine synchronous and metachronous neoplasms in patients with laterally spreading tumours. METHODS: We prospectively collected colonoscopy and histopathology data from patients who underwent colonoscopy in our centre at up to 6 years' follow‐up. Post‐resection surveillance outcomes between laterally spreading tumours, flat colorectal neoplasms 10 mm or greater, and large polypoid colorectal neoplasms, polypoid colorectal neoplasms 10 mm or greater, were compared. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2012, 8120 patients underwent colonoscopy for symptoms (84.6%), screening (6.7%) or surveillance (8.7%). At baseline, 151 patients had adenomatous laterally spreading tumours and 566 patients had adenomatous large polypoid colorectal neoplasms. Laterally spreading tumour patients had more synchronous colorectal neoplasms than large polypoid colorectal neoplasm patients (mean 3.34 vs. 2.34, p < 0.001). Laterally spreading tumour patients significantly more often developed metachronous colorectal neoplasms (71.6% vs. 54.2%, p = 0.0498) and colorectal neoplasms with high grade dysplasia/submucosal invasion than large polypoid colorectal neoplasm patients (36.4% vs. 15.8%, p < 0.001). After correction for age and gender, laterally spreading tumour patients were more likely than large polypoid colorectal neoplasm patients to develop a colorectal neoplasm with high grade dysplasia or submucosal invasion (hazard ratio 2.9, 95% confidence interval 1.8–4.6). The risk of metachronous colorectal cancer was not significantly different in laterally spreading tumours compared to large polypoid colorectal neoplasm patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with laterally spreading tumours developed more metachronous colorectal neoplasms with high grade dysplasia/submucosal invasion than large polypoid colorectal neoplasm patients. Based on these findings endoscopic treatment and surveillance recommendations for patients with laterally spreading tumours should be optimised