2 research outputs found
A regulatory overview of biosimilars across selected countries
Background: Biosimilars are biological medicines highly similar to a
reference biotherapeutic product. The marketing approval of biosimilars is expected to reduce health care spending and improve access to biological products. Although most of the regulatory authorities follows the World Health Organization guidelines for the approval of
biosimilars, regulatory pathways and evidence to achieve marketing
authorization may differ between countries.
Objectives: The study aimed to perform a cross-national comparison
of the regulatory approval of biosimilars.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving
researchers from Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia,
Guatemala, Italy, Mexico and the United States. The data collection
form was developed to investigate publicly available information on
the national regulatory processes for biosimilars approval and included
the names of biosimilars/reference products, manufacturing company,
year of approval, therapeutic indications, extrapolation of indications,
available clinical trials compared to the reference product and use of
real-world evidence (RWE) in the approval process. The collected
information was analyzed through descriptive statistics
Results: Two hundred and fifty-six biosimilars were identified, with
the highest number reported by Italy (67) and Brazil (41). From 2017
to 2019, the biosimilars approvals peaked in most of the countries.
The immunosuppressants and the antineoplastic agents were the only
therapeutic classes approved in all the studied countries. Adalimumab
and trastuzumab and were the most frequently approved products
with up to nine and six brands names authorized in the same country,
respectively. The assessment reports were not publicly available in all
countries. Most biosimilars authorizations accepted extrapolation of
therapeutic indications. Once marketed, line extensions were uncommon. National regulatory authorities did not report use of RWE in the
biosimilars approval process.
Conclusions: Despite the increase in the number of approvals in the
last years, the study revealed differences in the quantity and therapeutic classes of biosimilars approved across different countries. Generally, biosimilars were approved with extrapolation of indications and, as a consequence, further line extensions were not neede
Data sources for drug utilization research in Latin American countries - a cross-national study : DASDUR-LATAM study
PURPOSE: Drug utilization research (DUR) contributes to inform policymaking and to strengthen health systems. The availability of data sources is the first step for conducting DUR. However, documents that systematize these data sources in Latin American (LatAm) countries are not known. We compiled the potential data sources for DUR in the LatAm region. METHODS: A network of DUR experts from nine LatAm countries was assembled and experts conducted: (i) a website search of the government, academic, and private health institutions; (ii) screening of eligible data sources, and (iii) liaising with national experts in pharmacoepidemiology (via an online survey). The data sources were characterized by accessibility, geographic granularity, setting, sector of the data, sources and type of the data. Descriptive analyses were performed. RESULTS: We identified 125 data sources for DUR in nine LatAm countries. Thirty-eight (30%) of them were publicly and conveniently available; 89 (71%) were accessible with limitations, and 18 (14%) were not accessible or lacked clear rules for data access. From the 125 data sources, 76 (61%) were from the public sector only; 46 (37%) were from pharmacy records; 43 (34%) came from ambulatory settings and; 85 (68%) gave access to individual patient-level data. CONCLUSIONS: Although multiple sources for DUR are available in LatAm countries, the accessibility is a major challenge. The procedures for accessing DUR data should be transparent, feasible, affordable, and protocol-driven. This inventory could permit a comparison of drug utilization between countries identifying potential medication-related problems that need further exploration