68 research outputs found

    Invited Commentary: Broadening the Evidence for Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Education in the United States

    Get PDF

    A Systematic Review of the Literature on Parenting of Young Children with Visual Impairments and the Adaptions for Video-Feedback Intervention to Promote Positive Parenting (VIPP)

    Full text link

    Learning to Look: Cognitive Aspects of Visual Attention

    No full text
    Early visual orienting responses can be prevented in infants with central nervous system damage. Children who have extensive damage in the visual system may ignore whatever visual stimuli they receive. Other children who have a viable visual system may receive the stimuli, but have difficulty with perceiving, interpreting or acting on incoming stimuli. If experience is lacking, visual behavior may never develop. The development of visual pathways seems to depend on experience as well as physiological factors. Intervention must be planned to help multihandicapped children integrate what they see with what they know. Where there is a deficit in the sensory mechanism, repeated stimula­tion is necessary in order for the brain to receive and process visual stimuli. Visually impaired multihan­dicapped children do learn to visually attend and process visual information

    Parent-reported problem behavior among children with sensory disabilities attending elementary regular schools

    No full text
    Parent-reported problem behaviors of 94 children with visual and auditory disabilities, attending elementary regular schools, were compared with problems reported in a general population sample of nondisabled children. Both samples were matched by means of a pairwise matching procedure, taking into account age and sex. Problem behavior was measured by Achenbach's (1991) CBCL (Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4-18 and 1991 Profile, University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, Burlington, VT). No significant main effects of type, degree, and nature of disability were found on the CBCL Total Problems scale, nor on the syndrome scales. In general, children with sensory disabilities attending elementary regular schools did not show more problems in comparison to nondisabled children. Merely on the Social Problems scale there was a significant difference between both samples, the children with sensory disabilities getting higher scores than their nondisabled peers. Further, children with sensory disabilities ran considerable risks of developing deviant scores on the Social Problems and the Thought Problems syndromes, the odds being respectively 3.2 and 5.2 times higher than in the general population sample. To optimize the benefits from placement in integrated classrooms for children with sensory disabilities, school counselors and teachers should not only focus on the academic achievements of these children, but also on their social skills and peer sociometric status
    • …
    corecore