Microarray evidence for off target effects in tick RNA interference experiments, and the lack of strong correlation between DSRNA and antibody phenotypes in tick In vitro treatments for vaccine candidate screening

No abstract availabl

Placing barrier-island transgression in a blue-carbon context

Backbarrier saltmarshes are considered carbon sinks; however, barrier island transgression and the associated processes of erosion and overwash are typically not included in coastal carbon budgets. Here, we present a carbon-budget model for transgressive barrier islands that includes a dynamic carbon-storage term, driven by backbarrier-marsh width, and a carbon-export term, driven by ocean and backbarrier shoreline erosion. To examine the impacts of storms, human disturbances and the backbarrier setting of a transgressive barrier island on carbon budgets and reservoirs, the model was applied to sites at Core Banks and Onslow Beach, NC, USA. Results show that shoreline erosion and burial of backbarrier marsh from washover deposition and dredge-spoil disposal temporarily transitioned each site into a net exporter (source) of carbon. The magnitude of the carbon reservoir was linked to the backbarrier setting of an island. Carbon reservoirs of study sites separated from the mainland by only backbarrier marsh (no lagoon) decreased for over a decade because carbon storage could not keep pace with erosion. With progressive narrowing of the backbarrier marsh, these barriers will begin to function more persistently as carbon sources until the reservoir is depleted at the point where the barrier welds with the mainland. Undeveloped barrier islands with wide lagoons are carbon sources briefly during erosive periods; however, at century time scales are net carbon importers (sinks) because new marsh habitat can form during barrier rollover. Human development on backbarrier saltmarsh serves to reduce the carbon storage capacity and can hasten the transition of an island from a sink to a source

Where do coastlines stabilize following rapid retreat?

We present a numerical model that shows that the transgressing upper shoreline of wave-dominated estuaries (bayhead deltas), which commonly contain populous urban and industrial centers, stabilizes, and their rate of retreat decreases at tributary junctions. The decreased rate of retreat across a tributary junction is caused by a decrease in the total accommodation, while sediment supply remains conserved. Our model predicts that bayhead deltas from smaller systems will be located closer to tributary confluences than their larger counterparts. An examination of the modern bayhead deltas in Albemarle Sound, U.S. Atlantic Coast, reveals that bayhead deltas from smaller tributaries are located closer to tributary confluences than bayhead deltas associated with larger tributaries, supporting our model prediction. Our results highlight the importance of antecedent topography created during falling sea-levels on shaping the nature of transgression during the ensuing sea-level rise. In particular, tributary junctions act as pinning points during transgression. Key Points Bayhead deltas stabilize at tributary junctions during transgression Inherited topography impacts the nature of subsequent transgressions Smaller deltas retreat at slower rates within flooded valley networks

Bayhead deltas and shorelines: Insights from modern and ancient examples

Bayhead deltas are important components of the rock record as well as modern estuaries, hosting important hydrocarbon reservoirs and many coastal cities, ports and large expanses of wetlands. Despite their significance, few studies have summarized their occurrence and sedimentary characteristics. In this paper we review the stratigraphic, sedimentary, and geomorphic characteristics of 68 modern and ancient bayhead deltas. Bayhead deltas are found in incised valleys, structural basins, fjords, interdistributary bays of larger open-ocean deltas, and other backbarrier environments. Except for within fjords, they generally prograde into shallower and more brackish waters than their open-ocean equivalents. As a result, 80% of modern, 68% of Quaternary, and 67% of ancient bayhead deltas have clinoform thicknesses of 10 m or less with 73% of modern bayhead deltas having clinoform thicknesses of 5 m or less. Additionally, 89% of modern, 81% of Quaternary, and 77% of ancient bayhead deltas examined are fluvial dominated. We distinguish true bayhead deltas from their genetically similar bayhead shorelines, which are not constructional features but sites of enhanced marsh or estuarine sedimentation near river mouths with inadequate rates of sediment delivery to form distributary channels and prograde into the estuary or lagoon. We also distinguish confined bayhead deltas found in incised valleys, structural basins, and fjords from unconfined bayhead deltas found as incipient lobes of larger delta complexes and other back-barrier lagoons. The architecture of confined bayhead deltas is largely influenced by the limited accommodation brought about by the walls of the flooded valleys in which they are located. As such, confined bayhead-delta ontogeny is controlled by many autogenic interactions within these valley walls. Both confined and unconfined bayhead deltas are sensitive to sea-level rise, climate-controlled changes in sediment flux, and tectonics. Their relatively small size, connection with the terrestrial system, and protected nature make them the ideal depositional system to record Earth history including sea-level and climate changes

Tracing the sources, fate, and recycling of fine sediments across a river-delta interface

Deltaic floodplains are thought to be long-term depositional environments, however there remains a limited understanding regarding timescales of depositional and erosional events, sediment delivery pathways and sediment storage. This study uses sediment concentration and sediment fingerprinting to examine the contribution of surface and subsurface sources to suspended sediment transiting the Lower Roanoke River, North Carolina, United States. The Lower Roanoke is disconnected from its high-gradient uplands in the Piedmont and Appalachian Mountains by a series of dams, which effectively restricts suspended sediment delivery from the headwaters. Accordingly, sediments from the Lower Roanoke River basin are the primary source of suspended sediment downstream of the dams. The fingerprinting method utilized fallout radionuclide tracers (210Pbxs and 137Cs) to examine the spatial variation of sediment-source contributions to suspended-sediment samples (n = 79). Three end-member sources were sampled: 1. surface sources (floodplains and topsoils; n = 60), 2. subsurface sources (channel bed and banks; n = 66), and 3. deltaic sources (delta front and prodelta; n = 11). The results demonstrate that with decreasing river slope and increasing influence of estuarine-driven flow dynamics, the relative contribution of surface sediments to the suspended-sediment load increases from 20% (± 2%) in the upper reach, to 67% (± 1%) in the Roanoke bayhead delta (BHD). At the river mouth, the surface-sediment contribution decreases, and the delta front and prodelta sediments contribute 74% (± 1%) to the suspended load. These results indicate, that during the delta transgression, erosion of the lower delta provides an additional source of sediment to the upper delta. At the same time, the lower deltaic plain, considered a sediment sink and long-term sediment-storage site, becomes erosional. The lower river and distributary network of the delta plain, which were thought to only disperse sediments in a seaward direction, may also have an important landward-directed sediment-dispersal component that provides nourishment and fortification to the upper BHD, at the cost of the eroding lower delta. Recognition of these contrasting sediment pathways in the Roanoke River highlights that these complex bidirectional processes may exist in other eroding deltas. Understanding these bidirectional processes will be necessary for the ongoing management of deltaic environments under increasing anthropogenic stress such as land use change and accelerating sea-level rise

Sea level anomalies exacerbate beach erosion

Sea level anomalies are intra-seasonal increases in water level forced by meteorological and oceanographic processes unrelated to storms. The effects of sea level anomalies on beach morphology are unknown but important to constrain because these events have been recognized over large stretches of continental margins. Here, we present beach erosion measurements along Onslow Beach, a barrier island on the U.S. East Coast, in response to a year with frequent sea level anomalies and no major storms. The anomalies enabled extensive erosion, which was similar and in most places greater than the erosion that occurred during a year with a hurricane. These results highlight the importance of sea level anomalies in facilitating coastal erosion and advocate for their inclusion in beach-erosion models and management plans. Sea level anomalies amplify the erosive effects of accelerated sea level rise and changes in storminess associated with global climate change

Coastal sedimentation across North America doubled in the 20th century despite river dams

The proliferation of dams since 1950 promoted sediment deposition in reservoirs, which is thought to be starving the coast of sediment and decreasing the resilience of communities to storms and sea-level rise. Diminished river loads measured upstream from the coast, however, should not be assumed to propagate seaward. Here, we show that century-long records of sediment mass accumulation rates (g cm−2 yr−1) and sediment accumulation rates (cm yr−1) more than doubled after 1950 in coastal depocenters around North America. Sediment sources downstream of dams compensate for the river-sediment lost to impoundments. Sediment is accumulating in coastal depocenters at a rate that matches or exceeds relative sea-level rise, apart from rapidly subsiding Texas and Louisiana where water depths are increasing and intertidal areas are disappearing. Assuming no feedbacks, accelerating global sea-level rise will eventually surpass current sediment accumulation rates, underscoring the need for including coastal-sediment management in habitat-restoration projects