16 research outputs found

    Dark Chocolate Intake Positively Modulates Redox Status and Markers of Muscular Damage in Elite Football Athletes: A Randomized Controlled Study

    Get PDF
    Intensive physical exercise may cause increase oxidative stress and muscular injury in elite football athletes. The aim of this study was to exploit the effect of cocoa polyphenols on oxidative stress and muscular injuries induced by intensive physical exercise in elite football players. Oxidant/antioxidant status and markers of muscle damage were evaluated in 24 elite football players and 15 controls. Furthermore, the 24 elite football players were randomly assigned to either a dark chocolate (>85% cocoa) intake (n = 12) or a control group (n = 12) for 30 days in a randomized controlled trial. Oxidative stress, antioxidant status, and muscle damage were assessed at baseline and after 30 days of chocolate intake. Compared to controls, elite football players showed lower antioxidant power and higher oxidative stress paralleled by an increase in muscle damage markers. After 30 days of dark chocolate intake, an increased antioxidant power was found in elite athletes assuming dark chocolate. Moreover, a significant reduction in muscle damage markers (CK and LDH, p < 0.001) was observed. In the control group, no changes were observed with the exception of an increase of sNox2-dp, H2O2, and myoglobin. A simple linear regression analysis showed that sNox2-dp was associated with a significant increase in muscle damage biomarker release (p = 0.001). An in vitro study also confirmed that polyphenol extracts significantly decreased oxidative stress in murine myoblast cell line C2C12-derived. These results indicate that polyphenol-rich nutrient supplementation by means of dark chocolate positively modulates redox status and reduced exercise-induced muscular injury biomarkers in elite football athletes. This trial is registered with NCT03288623

    The use of functional tests and planned coronary angiography after percutaneous coronary revascularization in clinical practice. Results from the AFTER multicenter study

    Get PDF
    Background: The follow-up strategies after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have relevant clinical and economic implications. The purpose of this prospective observational multicenter study was to evaluate the effect of clinical, procedural and organizational variables on the execution of functional testing (FT) and planned coronary angiography (CA) after PCI, and to assess the impact of American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines on clinical practice. Methods: Four hundred twenty consecutive patients undergoing PCI were categorized as class I, IIB and III indications for follow-up FT according to ACC/AHA guidelines recommendations. Furthermore, all patients were grouped according to the presence or absence of FT and/or planned CA over 12 months after PCI. Multivariable analysis was used to assess the potential predictors of test execution. Results: During the 12-month follow-up at least one test was performed in 72% of patients with class I indication, 63% of patients with class IIB indication and 75% of patients with class III indication (p=ns). A total of 283 patients (67%) underwent testing. The use of tests was associated with younger age (R. R. 0.94, C. I. 0.91 +/- 0.97, p<0.001), a lower number of diseased vessels (R.R. 0.60, C.I. 0.43 +/- 0.84, p=0.003), follow-up by the center performing PCI (R. R. 2.64, C. I. 1.43 +/- 4.86, p=0.002), and the specific center at which PCI was performed. Most asymptomatic patients completed their testing prematurely with respect to the risk period for restenosis. Conclusions: The use of FT and planned CA after PCI is unrelated to patient's symptom status, and depends on patient's age and logistics. ACC/AHA guidelines have no influence in clinical practice, and test timing is not tailored to the risk period for restenosis. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved

    Clinical SYNTAX score predicts outcomes of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

    No full text
    Background The SYNTAX score (SS) is a determinant of outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. In addition, it has been recently shown that the clinical SYNTAX score (cSS), obtained by adding clinical variables to the SS, improves the predictive power of the resulting risk model. We assessed the hypothesis that the use of the cSS may predict outcomes of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods We measured the SYNTAX score in 874 patients undergoing isolated first time on-pump CABG. The clinical SYNTAX score was calculated at the time of the study using age, creatinine clearance and ejection fraction, the modified ACEF score, and analyses performed for major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and all-cause mortality at 3-year follow-up. Results The mean age of the study population was 70.9 ± 8.1 years, and the median cSS 14.2 (range 2.1–286.5). The ROC curve analysis showed that a cSS >14.5 (81.4% sensitivity and 67.8% specificity) was a reliable tool in discrimination of patients for the occurrence of MACCE (AUC 0.78) and all-cause mortality (AUC 0.74). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis confirmed that patients belonging to higher cSS quartiles have poorer 3-year survival (P =.0001) and MACCE-free survival (P =.0001), with respect to those with lower cSS. Conclusions This observational study has shown that the clinical SYNTAX score, incorporating the lesion-based SS and clinical-based ACEF score, predicted mid-term adverse outcomes of patients undergoing CABG and may play an important role in the risk stratification of this population. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings

    Complexity of coronary artery disease affects outcome of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with impaired left ventricular function

    Get PDF
    Objective: To determine whether the SYNTAX score can predict the outcomes of patients with left ventricular dysfunction undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods: We studied a consecutive series of 191 patients (mean age, 67 +/- 10 years) with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less who were undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. All patients were stratified according to their SYNTAX score, indicating coronary artery disease complexity: low, 0 to 22; intermediate, 23 to 32; and high, 33 or more. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included the late occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, left ventricular function, and New York Heart Association functional class. Results: The mean SYNTAX score was 32 +/- 13, and the mean preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction was 35% +/- 6%. At a median follow-up of 43 months, the primary outcome had occurred in 46 of 191 patients (24%). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a survival of 81% +/- 15% for low, 77% +/- 7% for intermediate, and 53% +/- 7% for high coronary artery disease complexity (chi(2), 29.4; P=.001). The rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events was significantly greater in patients with a SYNTAX score of 33 or more (P=.002). Greater degrees of left ventricular ejection fraction improvement were found in patients with a SYNTAX score of 32 or less (+15% +/- 10% vs +4% +/- 11%; P=.17) and translated into a better New York Heart Association functional class among patients with a lower SYNTAX score (P=.01). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed the SYNTAX score (area under the curve, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.77) to have the best predictive power for late mortality with respect to the preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (area under the curve, 0.59; difference, P=.04) and incomplete revascularization (area under the curve, 0.55; difference, P=.02). Conclusions: The results of the present study have shown a direct relationship between coronary artery disease complexity and late outcomes of patients with left ventricular dysfunction who are undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Additional studies are needed to confirm these findings

    Complexity of coronary artery disease affects outcome of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with impaired left ventricular function

    Get PDF
    ObjectiveTo determine whether the SYNTAX score can predict the outcomes of patients with left ventricular dysfunction undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.MethodsWe studied a consecutive series of 191 patients (mean age, 67 ± 10 years) with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less who were undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. All patients were stratified according to their SYNTAX score, indicating coronary artery disease complexity: low, 0 to 22; intermediate, 23 to 32; and high, 33 or more. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included the late occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, left ventricular function, and New York Heart Association functional class.ResultsThe mean SYNTAX score was 32 ± 13, and the mean preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction was 35% ± 6%. At a median follow-up of 43 months, the primary outcome had occurred in 46 of 191 patients (24%). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a survival of 81% ± 15% for low, 77% ± 7% for intermediate, and 53% ± 7% for high coronary artery disease complexity (χ2, 29.4; P = .001). The rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events was significantly greater in patients with a SYNTAX score of 33 or more (P = .002). Greater degrees of left ventricular ejection fraction improvement were found in patients with a SYNTAX score of 32 or less (+15% ± 10% vs +4% ± 11%; P = .17) and translated into a better New York Heart Association functional class among patients with a lower SYNTAX score (P = .01). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed the SYNTAX score (area under the curve, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.77) to have the best predictive power for late mortality with respect to the preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (area under the curve, 0.59; difference, P = .04) and incomplete revascularization (area under the curve, 0.55; difference, P = .02).ConclusionsThe results of the present study have shown a direct relationship between coronary artery disease complexity and late outcomes of patients with left ventricular dysfunction who are undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Additional studies are needed to confirm these findings

    Residual SYNTAX score following coronary artery bypass grafting

    No full text
    Objectives: To quantify residual coronary artery disease measured using the SYNTAX score (SS) and its relation to outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis on a consecutive series of 1608 patients [mean age 68 years, standard deviation (SD): 7, F:M, 242:1366] undergoing first-time isolated CABG from 2004 to 2015. The baseline SS was retrospectively determined from preoperative angiograms, and the residual SS (rSS) was measured during assessment of the actual operative report for each patient after CABG. Patients were then stratified according to tercile cut points of low (rSSlow 0-11, N= 537), intermediate (rSSmid > 11-18.5, N= 539) and high residual SS (rSShigh > 18.5, N= 532). The Cox regression model was used to investigate the impact of rSS on major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 1 year. Results: The mean preoperative SS was 26.6 (SD: 9.4) (range 10.1-53), and the residual SS after CABG was 15.3 (SD: 8.4) (range 0-34) (P < 0.001 versus preoperative). At 1 year, cumulative incidence of MACCE in the low rSS was 1.5% (N= 8/537), 4.5% (N= 24/539) in the intermediate and 8.8% (N= 47/532) in the high rSS group. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a statistically significant difference of MACCEfree survival between the three groups (log-rank test, P < 0.001). The estimated MACCE-free survival rate at 1 year was 98.1% [standard error (SE): 1.6] for the rSSlow, 95.5% (SE: 1.9) for the rSSmid, and 90.5% (SE: 1.3) for the rSShigh group, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, the rSShigh group was independently associated with a higher incidence of MACCE at 1 year (hazard ratio 1.92, 95% confidence interval 1.21-3.23) compared to the rSSlow group. Conclusions: These unanticipated findings suggest that a residual SS may be a useful tool for risk stratification of patients undergoing isolated first-time CABG. Our study may set the stage for further investigations addressing this important clinical question

    Low prevalence of cardiac abnormalities in competitive athletes at return-to-play after COVID-19

    No full text
    Objective: to evaluate the prevalence of cardiac involvement after COVID-19 in competitive athletes at return-to-play (RTP) evaluation, following the recommended Italian protocol including cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and 24-Hour Holter monitoring. Design and methods: this is a single centre observational, cross-sectional study. Since October 2020, all competitive athletes (age ≥ 14 years) evaluated in our Institute after COVID-19, prior RTP were enrolled. The protocol dictated by the Italian governing bodies included: 12‑lead ECG, blood test, CPET, 24-h ECG monitoring, spirometry. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) was performed based on clinical indication. Results: 219 consecutive athletes were examined (59% male), age 23 years (IQR 19-27), 21% asymptomatic, 77% mildly symptomatic, 2% with previous pneumonia. The evaluation was performed after a median of 10 (6-17) days from negative SARS-CoV-2 swab. All athletes showed a good exercise capacity at CPET without cardiovascular and respiratory limitations. Uncommon premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) were found in 9.5% (n = 21) at CPET/Holter ECG monitoring. Two athletes (0.9%) were diagnosed with acute myocarditis (by CMR) and another one with new pericardial effusion. All the three athletes were temporally restricted from sport participation. Conclusions: Myocarditis in competitive athletes screened after COVID-19 resolution was detected in a low minority of the cases (0.9%). However, a non-negligible prevalence of uncommon PVCs (9%) was observed, either at CPET and/or Holter ECG monitoring, including all athletes with COVID-19 related cardiovascular abnormalities
    corecore