29 research outputs found

    Functional analysis.

    Full text link
    <p>Panel A. Mean b-wave fERG amplitude (μV) plotted against luminance (cd/m<sup>2</sup>). The mean ± SE is reported for each experimental group (n = 6 for each group). Dash dot-dot and continuous line represent the trend of LD Control group, respectively. Panel B: Representative fERG response in the three experimental conditions (CeO<sub>2</sub> NP, Saline, Vein) at 3 cd/m<sup>2</sup>. Statistical analysis was performed, for each group versus CeO<sub>2</sub> NP, using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test. *P< 0.05.</p

    Electronic and structural properties of CeO<sub>2</sub> Nanoparticles.

    Full text link
    <p>Decomposition of the XPS Ce 3<i>d</i> core level into Ce<sup>3+</sup> and Ce<sup>4+</sup> emission (left panel) and XRD pattern (right panel) for the as prepared CeO<sub><b>2</b></sub> nanoparticles.</p

    Microglia and TUNEL images in LD and intravenous injection.

    Full text link
    <p>Immunolabelling for microglia (anti-Iba1) in green and apoptotic nuclei in red. The figure shows two different parts of superior retina, in each experimental group, one week after BCL. The arrows indicate the presence of activated microglia in the ONL. Panels A-B: “hot spot” region in LD and Vein; panels A1-B1: “near hot spot” in LD and Vein; panel C: control. ONL: outer nuclear layer, INL: inner nuclear layer, GCL: ganglion cell layer.</p

    Thickness of ONL in all experimental conditions.

    Full text link
    <p>Representative sections from superior retina (1 mm from optic disc) of Control (A), CeO<sub>2</sub> NP: (B), Saline: (C), Vein: injected trough the tail vein (D) and LD (E). In all panels nuclei, labelled with propidium iodide, are reported in black and white. Panel F shows ONL thickness as a function of distance from the superior to the inferior edge crossing optic disc. Measurements are expressed as ratio ONL/total retina thickness. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test for each group versus CeO<sub>2</sub> NP group. Data are shown as mean ± SE; (n = 6 for each group). *P< 0.05, **P<0.01. ONL: outer nuclear layer, INL: inner nuclear layer, GCL: ganglion cell layer.</p

    FITC-CeO<sub>2</sub> nanoparticles in retinal sections labelled with bisbenzimide.

    Full text link
    <p>Panels A-B: intravitreal injection of FITC-CeO<sub>2</sub> NPs in rats euthanized after 24 h and after 3 weeks respectively. Panels C-D: injection trough the tail vein of FITC-CeO<sub>2</sub> NPs in rat euthanized after 24 h and after 3 weeks respectively. Images have been acquired with confocal microscopy. In panel B the white rectangle represents the bleaching of FITC-CeO<sub>2</sub> NPs. Scale bars: (A-B-C-D) 50μm. OS: outer segment, ONL: outer nuclear layer, INL: inner nuclear layer, GCL: ganglion cell layer.</p

    Microglia and TUNEL images in intravitreal injection.

    Full text link
    <p>Panels A-B: “hot spot” region in CeO<sub>2</sub> NP and Saline group; Panels A1-B1: “near hot spot” in CeO<sub>2</sub> NP and Saline; panel C: Control. Abbreviations and arrows as in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0140387#pone.0140387.g006" target="_blank">Fig 6</a>.</p

    FGF2 immunolabelling in “hot spot” region.

    Full text link
    <p>In panel A: Control, panel B: CeO<sub>2</sub> NP, panel C: Saline, panel D: Vein and panel E: LD, with a scale bar of 50 μm. Panels A1-B1-C1-D1-E1: High magnification with a scale bar of 10 μm. ONL: outer nuclear layer, INL: inner nuclear layer, GCL: ganglion cell layer.</p

    TNF-α immunolabelling in “hot spot” region.

    Full text link
    <p>Images show the double immunolabelling for microglia (green) and TNF-α (red) in: Control (A), LD (B) and CeO<sub>2</sub> NP (C). The arrow indicates the phagocitic activity of activated microglia in the ONL. Scale bar: 20 μm. ONL: outer nuclear layer, INL: inner nuclear layer, GCL: ganglion cell layer.</p

    Analysis of “hot spot” region.

    Full text link
    <p>The graph represents the ratio between “hot spot” and superior retina length in the four experimental conditions. Statistical analysis was performed, for each group versus CeO<sub>2</sub> NP group, using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test (n = 6 for each experimental group). *P<0.05.</p

    Mean fluorescence intensity analysis for FGF2.

    Full text link
    <p>The graph represents the mean fluorescence intensity of FGF2 in the ONL from superior to inferior edge through the optic nerve. Comparison between four experimental groups: LD, CeO<sub>2</sub> NP, Saline and Vein.</p
    corecore