8 research outputs found

    Null ideals of matrices over residue class rings of principal ideal domains

    Full text link
    Given a square matrix AA with entries in a commutative ring SS, the ideal of S[X]S[X] consisting of polynomials ff with f(A)=0f(A) =0 is called the null ideal of AA. Very little is known about null ideals of matrices over general commutative rings. We compute a generating set of the null ideal of a matrix in case S=D/dDS = D/dD is the residue class ring of a principal ideal domain DD modulo d∈Dd\in D. We discuss two applications. At first, we compute a decomposition of the SS-module S[A]S[A] into cyclic SS-modules and explain the strong relationship between this decomposition and the determined generating set of the null ideal of AA. And finally, we give a rather explicit description of the ring \IntA of all integer-valued polynomials on AA

    Bounds on the radius and status of graphs

    Full text link
    Two classical concepts of centrality in a graph are the median and the center. The connected notions of the status and the radius of a graph seem to be in no relation. In this paper, however, we show a clear connection of both concepts, as they obtain their minimum and maximum values at the same type of tree graphs. Trees with fixed maximum degree and extremum radius and status, resp., are characterized. The bounds on radius and status can be transferred to general connected graphs via spanning trees. A new method of proof allows not only to regain results of Lin et al. on graphs with extremum status, but it allows also to prove analogous results on graphs with extremum radius

    Fluctuations in depth and associated primes of powers of ideals

    Full text link
    We count the numbers of associated primes of powers of ideals as defined by Bandari, Hibi, and Herzog in 2014. We generalize those ideals to monomial ideals BHH⁑(m,r,s)\operatorname{BHH}(m,r,s) for rβ‰₯2r \ge 2, mm, sβ‰₯1s \ge 1; we establish partially the associated primes of powers of these ideals, and we establish completely the depth function of quotients by powers of these ideals: the depth function is periodic of period rr repeated mm times on the initial interval before settling to a constant value. The number of needed variables for these depth functions are lower than those from general constructions by H\`{a}, Nguyen, Trung, and Trung (2021)

    Characterizing absolutely irreducible integer-valued polynomials over discrete valuation domains

    Full text link
    Rings of integer-valued polynomials are known to be atomic, non-factorial rings furnishing examples for both irreducible elements for which all powers factor uniquely (\emph{absolutely irreducibles}) and irreducible elements where some power has a factorization different from the trivial one. In this paper, we study irreducible polynomials F∈Int⁑(R)F \in \operatorname{Int}(R) where RR is a discrete valuation domain with finite residue field and show that it is possible to explicitly determine a number S∈NS\in \mathbb{N} that reduces the absolute irreducibility of FF to the unique factorization of FSF^S. To this end, we establish a connection between the factors of powers of FF and the kernel of a certain linear map that we associate to FF. This connection yields a characterization of absolute irreducibility in terms of this so-called \emph{fixed divisor kernel}. Given a non-trivial element v\boldsymbol{v} of this kernel, we explicitly construct non-trivial factorizations of FkF^k, provided that kβ‰₯Lk\ge L, where LL depends on FF as well as the choice of v\boldsymbol{v}. We further show that this bound cannot be improved in general. Additionally, we provide other (larger) lower bounds for kk, one of which only depends on the valuation of the denominator of FF and the size of the residue class field of RR

    Irreducible polynomials in Int(β„€)

    No full text
    In order to fully understand the factorization behavior of the ring Int(β„€) = {f ∈ β„š[x] | f (β„€) βŠ† β„€} of integer-valued polynomials on β„€, it is crucial to identify the irreducible elements. Peruginelli [8] gives an algorithmic criterion to recognize whether an integer-valued polynomial g/d] Prad∝Psw1.2P_{\textrm{rad}} \propto P_{\textrm{sw}}^{1.2} gd is irreducible in the case where d is a square-free integer and g ∈ β„€[x] has fixed divisor d. For integer-valued polynomials with arbitrary composite denominators, so far there is no algorithmic criterion known to recognize whether they are irreducible. We describe a computational method which allows us to recognize all irreduciblexc polynomials in Int(β„€). We present some known facts, preliminary new results and open questions

    Irreducible polynomials in Int(β„€)

    No full text
    In order to fully understand the factorization behavior of the ring Int(β„€) = {f ∈ β„š[x] | f (β„€) βŠ† β„€} of integer-valued polynomials on β„€, it is crucial to identify the irreducible elements. Peruginelli [8] gives an algorithmic criterion to recognize whether an integer-valued polynomial Prad∝Psw1.2P_{\textrm{rad}} \propto P_{\textrm{sw}}^{1.2} is irreducible in the case where d is a square-free integer and g ∈ β„€[x] has fixed divisor d. For integer-valued polynomials with arbitrary composite denominators, so far there is no algorithmic criterion known to recognize whether they are irreducible. We describe a computational method which allows us to recognize all irreduciblexc polynomials in Int(β„€). We present some known facts, preliminary new results and open questions
    corecore