43 research outputs found
How good are your fits? Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests in high energy physics
Multivariate analyses play an important role in high energy physics. Such
analyses often involve performing an unbinned maximum likelihood fit of a
probability density function (p.d.f.) to the data. This paper explores a
variety of unbinned methods for determining the goodness of fit of the p.d.f.
to the data. The application and performance of each method is discussed in the
context of a real-life high energy physics analysis (a Dalitz-plot analysis).
Several of the methods presented in this paper can also be used for the
non-parametric determination of whether two samples originate from the same
parent p.d.f. This can be used, e.g., to determine the quality of a detector
Monte Carlo simulation without the need for a parametric expression of the
efficiency.Comment: 32 pages, 12 figure
Democracy and governance networks: compatible or not?
The relationship between representative democracy and governance networks is investigated
at a theoretical level. Four conjectures about the relationship are defined. The
incompatibility conjectures rests on the primacy of politics and sees governance networks as a
threat. The complementarity conjecture presents governance networks as a means of enabling
greater participation in the policy process and sensitivity in programme implementation. The
transitional conjecture posits a wider evolution of governance forms towards network
relationships. The instrumental conjecture views governance networks as a powerful means
through which dominant interests can achieve their goals. Illustrative implications for theory
and practice are identified, in relation to power in the policy process, the public interest, and
the role of public managers. The heuristic potential of the conjectures is demonstrated
through the identification of an outline research agenda
Factors Associated with Revision Surgery after Internal Fixation of Hip Fractures
Background: Femoral neck fractures are associated with high rates of revision surgery after management with internal fixation. Using data from the Fixation using Alternative Implants for the Treatment of Hip fractures (FAITH) trial evaluating methods of internal fixation in patients with femoral neck fractures, we investigated associations between baseline and surgical factors and the need for revision surgery to promote healing, relieve pain, treat infection or improve function over 24 months postsurgery. Additionally, we investigated factors associated with (1) hardware removal and (2) implant exchange from cancellous screws (CS) or sliding hip screw (SHS) to total hip arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty, or another internal fixation device. Methods: We identified 15 potential factors a priori that may be associated with revision surgery, 7 with hardware removal, and 14 with implant exchange. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses in our investigation. Results: Factors associated with increased risk of revision surgery included: female sex, [hazard ratio (HR) 1.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-2.50; P = 0.001], higher body mass index (fo